DoD's $10.1M ATFP Program Support Contract Awarded to CRA, Inc. Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,146,615 ($10.1M)

Contractor: CRA, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-07-20

End Date: 2010-07-14

Contract Duration: 1,090 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: HQMC ATFP PROGRAM SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20380

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.1 million to CRA, INC. for work described as: HQMC ATFP PROGRAM SUPPORT Key points: 1. The contract awarded to CRA, Inc. for HQMC ATFP Program Support totals $10.1 million. 2. Competition was full and open, indicating a broad market search. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns. 4. The duration of the contract was 1090 days. 5. The award was made by the Department of the Navy.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type, while allowing flexibility, carries inherent risks of cost escalation. Benchmarking against similar engineering services contracts is difficult without detailed scope and performance data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure may not incentivize the most cost-effective solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for program support services. The effectiveness of the competition and contract type in achieving value for money will determine the ultimate taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

Ensures critical Anti-Terrorism Force Protection program support for the Headquarters Marine Corps. Supports engineering services vital for national security infrastructure. The contract's duration and cost impact the allocation of defense resources. Transparency in spending is maintained through the full and open competition process.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type may lead to higher costs.
  • Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment challenging.
  • Limited information on the specific engineering services provided.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Supports a critical national security program.
  • Contract awarded by a major federal agency.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330), a sector crucial for defense infrastructure and program management. Spending in this sector is often project-specific and can vary significantly based on national security needs and technological advancements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as the 'sb' field is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were provided to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Navy, as part of the Department of Defense, is responsible for oversight. The contract's full and open competition suggests a degree of accountability in the procurement process.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type.
  • Lack of detailed scope of work.
  • No specific performance metrics provided.
  • Potential for cost overruns.
  • No indication of small business subcontracting.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, dc, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.1 million to CRA, INC.. HQMC ATFP PROGRAM SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CRA, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-07-20. End: 2010-07-14.

What specific engineering services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the ATFP program's objectives?

The provided data lacks specifics on the engineering services rendered. To assess value, details on the scope of work, deliverables, and their direct contribution to enhancing the Anti-Terrorism Force Protection program's effectiveness are necessary. Understanding these specifics would allow for a more precise evaluation of the $10.1 million investment.

What were the key factors that led to the selection of a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type for this engineering service requirement?

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type is often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined or when there is a high degree of uncertainty in the cost of performance. For engineering services, this might be due to evolving requirements or the need for flexibility in research and development. However, CPFF contracts can incentivize contractors to increase costs to maximize their fee, necessitating robust government oversight.

How does the awarded amount of $10.1 million compare to benchmarks for similar ATFP program support contracts within the Department of Defense?

Without access to a database of comparable ATFP program support contracts, a direct benchmark comparison is not feasible. Factors such as contract duration, specific services, geographic location, and the complexity of the ATFP requirements significantly influence pricing. A comprehensive analysis would require comparing this contract's cost per unit of service or per year against similar, recently awarded contracts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0002407R3334

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4401 FORD STE 600, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,992,378

Exercised Options: $18,503,114

Current Obligation: $10,146,615

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017806D4727

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-07-20

Current End Date: 2010-07-14

Potential End Date: 2010-07-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-11-19

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending