VA awards $15.6M for Architectural Services under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,605,656 ($15.6M)

Contractor: Blitch-Knevel LEO a Daly

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2005-12-14

End Date: 2016-09-30

Contract Duration: 3,943 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: NOT REQUIRED.

Place of Performance

Location: OMAHA, DOUGLAS County, NEBRASKA, 68114

State: Nebraska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $15.6 million to BLITCH-KNEVEL LEO A DALY for work described as: NOT REQUIRED. Key points: 1. Total contract value of $15.6 million. 2. Procured via Full and Open Competition. 3. Contract awarded to BLITCH-KNEVEL LEO A DALY. 4. Services provided to the Department of Veterans Affairs. 5. Contract duration spans over 10 years.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $15.6 million for architectural services over a 10-year period appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale architectural contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The use of Full and Open Competition suggests a robust price discovery process. This method allows multiple bidders to compete, theoretically driving down costs and ensuring fair market pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better value for taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment.

Public Impact

Supports the Department of Veterans Affairs' infrastructure development. Provides essential architectural design and planning services. Long-term contract indicates ongoing need for these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Full and Open Competition
Long contract duration suggests sustained need

Sector Analysis

Architectural services fall under professional services, often procured for large government infrastructure projects. Spending benchmarks vary significantly based on project scale and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had opportunities to participate as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The long duration of the contract (2005-2016) suggests it underwent multiple reviews and potential modifications. Oversight would focus on performance and adherence to contract terms throughout its lifecycle.

Related Government Programs

Architectural Services
Department of Veterans Affairs Contracting
Department of Veterans Affairs Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of small business participation noted.
Long contract duration may obscure performance trends without detailed oversight records.
No data on initial estimates vs. final award.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $15.6 million to BLITCH-KNEVEL LEO A DALY. NOT REQUIRED.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BLITCH-KNEVEL LEO A DALY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-12-14. End: 2016-09-30.

What was the average annual spending on this contract?

The contract spanned from December 14, 2005, to September 30, 2016, a period of approximately 10 years and 9 months. With a total award of $15,605,655.82, the average annual spending would be roughly $1.45 million. This figure provides a baseline for understanding the consistent investment in architectural services over the contract's life.

Were there any performance issues or contract modifications during its 10-year span?

The provided data does not detail performance issues or specific contract modifications. A comprehensive review would require access to contract performance reports, modification logs, and any associated documentation to assess if the services met expectations and if the scope or cost changed significantly over time.

How did the final cost compare to initial estimates or bids?

Without access to the initial bids or cost estimates submitted during the full and open competition, it's impossible to definitively state how the final award amount of $15.6 million compares. However, the 'full and open' nature of the procurement suggests competitive bidding likely influenced the final negotiated price.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Architectural Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8600 INDIAN HILLS DR, OMAHA, NE, 68114

Business Categories: Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,653,024

Exercised Options: $15,653,024

Current Obligation: $15,605,656

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline