DoD's $13.5M TRAC2ES Contract Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,476,208 ($13.5M)
Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-04-10
End Date: 2011-08-31
Contract Duration: 873 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: TRAC2ES
Place of Performance
Location: MC LEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: TRAC2ES Key points: 1. Contract Value: $13.5 million over approximately 2.9 years. 2. Competition: Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Risk: Fixed-fee contract type can shift risk to the contractor, but requires careful scope management. 4. Sector: Falls under Wired Telecommunications Carriers, a critical IT infrastructure service.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure is common but can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. Benchmarking against similar telecommunications contracts is difficult without detailed scope.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of full and open competition is positive for price discovery. However, the CPFF structure still necessitates robust oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable and aligned with the fixed fee.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for telecommunications services. The competitive award aims for efficiency, but CPFF requires vigilance against potential cost creep.
Public Impact
Ensures critical wired telecommunications infrastructure for the Department of Defense. Supports USTRANSCOM operations through reliable communication networks. Awarded through a competitive process, potentially yielding better value for taxpayers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- CPFF contract type requires strong oversight to control costs.
- Contract duration of nearly 3 years may not reflect current market agility.
- No specific small business participation noted.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Supports a vital government agency (DoD/USTRANSCOM).
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT and telecommunications sector, specifically wired telecommunications carriers. Spending in this area is essential for government operations, with benchmarks varying widely based on service complexity and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had an opportunity to participate or subcontract.
Oversight & Accountability
The CPFF contract type necessitates strong government oversight to monitor costs, ensure performance, and prevent scope creep. The award process itself, being full and open, suggests a degree of accountability in the initial selection.
Related Government Programs
- Wired Telecommunications Carriers
- Department of Defense Contracting
- USTRANSCOM Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type.
- Lack of specific performance metrics provided.
- No indication of small business participation.
- Contract duration may not reflect current technological advancements.
- Potential for cost overruns without stringent oversight.
Tags
wired-telecommunications-carriers, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. TRAC2ES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (USTRANSCOM).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-04-10. End: 2011-08-31.
What was the specific scope of services provided under this contract, and how did it align with the fixed fee?
The provided data lacks specifics on the service scope. For a CPFF contract, understanding the defined services is crucial to assess if the fixed fee was appropriate and if the contractor's costs were reasonable and allowable within that framework. Without this, evaluating true value is challenging.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) and how was performance measured to ensure effectiveness?
Effectiveness hinges on meeting defined performance metrics. For telecommunications, this could include uptime, latency, and bandwidth. The data doesn't specify KPIs, making it difficult to assess if the contractor met expectations or if the service adequately supported USTRANSCOM's mission requirements.
How did the competitive bidding process ensure the best possible price and value for the government?
Full and open competition theoretically allows multiple bidders to offer proposals, driving down prices through market forces. However, the CPFF structure introduces complexity. The government must ensure the winning proposal's cost basis was scrutinized and that the fixed fee adequately compensated the contractor for the defined scope without excessive profit.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Information › Wired and Wireless Telecommunications (except Satellite) › Wired Telecommunications Carriers
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)
Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE, MCLEAN, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,976,208
Exercised Options: $13,476,208
Current Obligation: $13,476,208
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W91QUZ06D0019
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-04-10
Current End Date: 2011-08-31
Potential End Date: 2011-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-07-08
More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology Next Generation (T4NG) Task Order - Benefits Integrated Delivery — $1.4B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (General Services Administration)
- Product and Technology Ecosystem Management Services (ptems)which Includes Product Delivery and Lifecycle Management to Transform VA by Tapping Into Emerging Technologies, Connecting Developers With VA Data, and Making Human Centered Design (HCD) — $1.1B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)