Treasury's $11.5M IT Services Contract with Booz Allen Hamilton Faced Limited Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,490,795 ($11.5M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2006-10-01

End Date: 2017-09-11

Contract Duration: 3,998 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.9K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 103

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: TIPSS 3 CONTRACT - TTS #2124

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20006

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $11.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. for work described as: TIPSS 3 CONTRACT - TTS #2124 Key points: 1. The contract awarded $11.5 million for Computer Systems Design Services. 2. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. was the primary contractor. 3. The contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, but the specific competition details are unclear. 4. The sector is Information Technology, specifically Computer Systems Design. 5. The contract duration was nearly 10 years, indicating a long-term need.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. Without specific performance metrics or comparison data, assessing the value for money is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

Awarded as a competitive delivery order, the limited competition suggests that only a few vendors were considered or able to bid. This could impact price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs than a fully open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The impact on taxpayers is uncertain due to the limited competition and the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, which may not have driven the most cost-effective solution.

Public Impact

Taxpayers funded IT services for the IRS over a decade. The contract supported critical government functions through computer systems design. The long duration suggests a sustained need for these services within the Treasury. The specific impact of these services on IRS operations is not detailed.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited competition for a significant contract.
  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure can incentivize higher spending.
  • Long contract duration without clear performance benchmarks.
  • Lack of transparency on the competitive process.

Positive Signals

  • Contract supported essential government IT functions.
  • Awarded through a delivery order mechanism, implying a specific need.
  • The contractor is a well-established firm in the federal space.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT sector, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. Federal spending in this area is substantial, with agencies relying on contractors for complex system development and maintenance. Benchmarks for similar services vary widely based on complexity and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or achieved through subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded as a delivery order under a larger contract (TIPSS 3), suggesting some level of pre-existing oversight. However, the limited competition and contract type warrant scrutiny regarding cost control and performance.

Related Government Programs

  • Computer Systems Design Services
  • Department of the Treasury Contracting
  • Internal Revenue Service Programs

Risk Flags

  • Limited competition raises concerns about price fairness.
  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts can lead to uncontrolled spending.
  • Lack of detailed performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
  • Long contract duration without clear end-of-life planning.
  • Unclear small business participation.

Tags

computer-systems-design-services, department-of-the-treasury, dc, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $11.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.. TIPSS 3 CONTRACT - TTS #2124

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-10-01. End: 2017-09-11.

What was the specific scope of 'Computer Systems Design Services' under this contract, and how did it align with the IRS's evolving technological needs over its nearly 10-year lifespan?

The scope likely encompassed the design, development, and integration of various computer systems and software solutions for the IRS. Given the long duration, it could have included everything from initial system architecture to ongoing modifications and upgrades. Alignment with evolving needs would depend on the contract's flexibility and the IRS's project management, but without specific deliverables, it's hard to confirm.

How did the 'limited' competition for this delivery order impact the final pricing and overall value achieved for the taxpayer compared to a fully open and competitive process?

Limited competition typically results in fewer bids, potentially reducing the downward pressure on prices. While the delivery order was 'competitive,' the constraints on bidders may have led to higher costs than if a broader range of vendors had been invited. Assessing the true value requires comparing the final price and service quality against market rates for similar services procured through more open means.

What mechanisms were in place to ensure effective oversight and accountability for a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract of this magnitude and duration, particularly concerning cost containment?

Oversight for such contracts usually involves detailed reporting requirements, regular audits, and defined milestones. For a CPFF contract, the government's contracting officer representatives (CORs) play a crucial role in monitoring expenditures and ensuring work aligns with the contract's objectives. However, the inherent nature of CPFF contracts requires diligent management to prevent cost overruns and ensure efficiency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 103

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 1953 GALLOWS RD STE 600, VIENNA, VA, 22182

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,954,840

Exercised Options: $12,350,377

Current Obligation: $11,490,795

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: TIRNO06D00026

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-10-01

Current End Date: 2017-09-11

Potential End Date: 2017-09-11 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-09-11

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of the Treasury Contracts

View all Department of the Treasury contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending