Treasury's IRS Spends $23M on Campus Guard Services with S&K Aerospace, Awarded via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,957,761 ($23.0M)

Contractor: S & K Aerospace, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2009-09-01

End Date: 2014-02-28

Contract Duration: 1,641 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 17

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TX2038ZZ CAMPUS GUARD SERVICE

Place of Performance

Location: AUSTIN, TRAVIS County, TEXAS, 78741

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $23.0 million to S & K AEROSPACE, LLC for work described as: TX2038ZZ CAMPUS GUARD SERVICE Key points: 1. Spending of $23M over 5 years for security guards. 2. Contract awarded to S & K Aerospace, LLC. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. 4. Sector is primarily services, specifically security. 5. No indication of small business participation.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $23M over 1641 days suggests an average annual spend of approximately $4.6M. Benchmarking against similar contracts for campus guard services is needed to assess if this pricing is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', indicating a competitive process. However, the 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants further investigation to understand its impact on price discovery and potential limitations.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, aiming to secure the best value. However, the specifics of the exclusion clause could potentially limit competition and impact overall cost-effectiveness.

Public Impact

Ensures security for IRS facilities in Texas. Supports a private sector company, S & K Aerospace, LLC. Represents a significant investment in physical security infrastructure. Potential impact on local employment in Texas. Transparency in government contracting is crucial for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The spending falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically security and investigation services. Benchmarks for similar government contracts for campus guard services would be useful for a more precise assessment.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). Further analysis is needed to determine if opportunities were missed for small business participation in providing these essential security services.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Treasury's Internal Revenue Service. Oversight would involve monitoring contract performance, adherence to terms, and financial accountability to ensure taxpayer funds are used effectively and efficiently.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

security-guards-and-patrol-services, department-of-the-treasury, tx, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $23.0 million to S & K AEROSPACE, LLC. TX2038ZZ CAMPUS GUARD SERVICE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is S & K AEROSPACE, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-09-01. End: 2014-02-28.

What was the rationale behind excluding specific sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award, and did this exclusion impact the final price?

The rationale for excluding sources needs to be thoroughly documented and justified. If specific capabilities or past performance were the basis, it should be clearly stated. Understanding this exclusion is critical to assess if it limited the competitive pool and potentially led to a higher price than could have been achieved in a truly unrestricted open competition.

How does the per-unit cost of these guard services compare to industry benchmarks for similar government contracts, considering the duration and scope?

A detailed cost-benefit analysis is required. Comparing the contract's total value and duration against industry standards for security guard services, adjusted for factors like geographic location, security clearance requirements, and service level agreements, will reveal if the government secured a competitive price. Deviations from benchmarks may indicate overspending or exceptional value.

What performance metrics were established for S & K Aerospace, and how effectively were these met throughout the contract period to ensure optimal security outcomes?

Effective oversight requires clearly defined Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and regular performance evaluations. Understanding the metrics used (e.g., response times, incident reporting accuracy, guard professionalism) and the contractor's performance against them is crucial to assess the effectiveness of the security services provided and the overall value for taxpayer money.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesInvestigation and Security ServicesSecurity Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 17

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 63066 OLD HIGHWAY 93, SAINT IGNATIUS, MT, 01

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Labor Surplus Area Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,957,761

Exercised Options: $22,957,761

Current Obligation: $22,957,761

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-09-01

Current End Date: 2014-02-28

Potential End Date: 2014-02-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2014-09-24

More Contracts from S & K Aerospace, LLC

View all S & K Aerospace, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of the Treasury Contracts

View all Department of the Treasury contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending