DoD Spends $152M on Aviation Spares from Boeing, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,277,835 ($15.3M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-05-27

End Date: 2020-12-31

Contract Duration: 4,236 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.6K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: AVIATION SPARES.

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.3 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: AVIATION SPARES. Key points: 1. Significant spending on aviation spares highlights critical supply chain needs. 2. Sole reliance on Boeing for these spares raises concerns about market competition. 3. Long contract duration and firm fixed price suggest potential for price escalation. 4. The 'Other Aircraft Parts' sector is vital for defense readiness.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The total award of $152.7M over 13 years for aviation spares is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this represents fair market value compared to similar contracts or industry benchmarks.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to The Boeing Company. This lack of competition limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition likely results in taxpayers paying a premium for these essential aviation spares.

Public Impact

Ensures continued availability of critical aircraft parts for military operations. Supports a major defense contractor, potentially impacting industry stability. Highlights the importance of robust supply chains for national security.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Long contract duration
  • Potential for price creep

Positive Signals

  • Ensures supply of critical parts
  • Supports established vendor relationship

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically for aircraft parts manufacturing. Spending benchmarks in this area are highly variable, depending on the specific aircraft and part complexity, but $152M over 13 years for a single vendor suggests a significant, potentially non-competitive, expenditure.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor. There is no indication of small business participation in this specific award, suggesting potential missed opportunities for SMBs in the supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's long duration and sole-source nature warrant scrutiny. Oversight should focus on ensuring fair pricing through regular reviews and exploring future competitive opportunities.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Logistics Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Long-term vendor dependency
  • Limited transparency in cost structure
  • Missed small business opportunities

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, mo, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.3 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. AVIATION SPARES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-05-27. End: 2020-12-31.

What is the justification for awarding this contract sole-source to Boeing, and were alternative sources considered?

The justification for a sole-source award is crucial for understanding the necessity of bypassing competition. Agencies typically cite reasons like unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of viable alternatives. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if the government received the best possible value and if taxpayer funds were used efficiently.

How does the unit cost of these aviation spares compare to industry benchmarks or previous contracts?

Benchmarking unit costs is essential for determining fair pricing. If the unit cost is significantly higher than comparable parts or previous acquisitions, it indicates potential overspending. This analysis is hampered by the sole-source nature of the award, making direct comparisons challenging without access to Boeing's cost data or alternative quotes.

What is the long-term strategy for ensuring competitive sourcing of these aviation spares to mitigate future risks?

A long-term strategy is vital to avoid sustained sole-source reliance. This could involve market research to identify new suppliers, investing in domestic production capabilities, or breaking down the requirement into smaller, more competitive lots. Proactive planning mitigates risks associated with vendor lock-in and price inflation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: J.S. MCDONNELL BLVD., SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63166

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,277,835

Exercised Options: $15,277,835

Current Obligation: $15,277,835

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0038306D004H

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-05-27

Current End Date: 2020-12-31

Potential End Date: 2020-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-08-27

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending