DoD Awards Boeing $34.7M for Aircraft Parts, Raising Concerns Over Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $34,700,000 ($34.7M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-12-28

End Date: 2016-02-28

Contract Duration: 1,157 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 5 EACH 01-472-2553 AND 6 EACH 01-472-2558

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $34.7 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: 5 EACH 01-472-2553 AND 6 EACH 01-472-2558 Key points: 1. Significant award to a single large contractor, Boeing. 2. Lack of competition raises questions about price discovery. 3. Potential for taxpayer overpayment due to sole-source nature. 4. Contract spans multiple years, indicating long-term need.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The total award of $34.7M for aircraft parts appears high given the lack of competitive bidding. Benchmarking against similar contracts for aircraft components is difficult without more data, but the absence of competition suggests potential for inflated pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to The Boeing Company. This method limits price discovery and may not yield the best value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition in this $34.7M award means taxpayers may have paid more than necessary for these aircraft parts.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for essential aircraft parts. Limited visibility into the justification for sole-source procurement. Potential impact on the broader aerospace parts market due to concentrated award.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • High dollar value

Positive Signals

  • Award to established contractor
  • Contract addresses critical defense needs

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector. Spending in this area is critical for defense readiness, but competitive procurement is essential to ensure cost-effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

The award went to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor, with no indication of small business subcontracting. This suggests a missed opportunity to support small businesses in the aerospace supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants further oversight to ensure the pricing is justified and that future procurements are competed where possible.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for overpricing
  • Limited small business participation
  • Long contract duration without competition

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, mo, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $34.7 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. 5 EACH 01-472-2553 AND 6 EACH 01-472-2558

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $34.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-12-28. End: 2016-02-28.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis instead of competing it?

The provided data does not include the specific justification for the sole-source award. Typically, sole-source contracts are justified when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services, or in cases of urgent and compelling need. Further investigation would be required to determine the exact rationale in this instance.

How does the $34.7M price compare to market rates for similar aircraft parts procured competitively?

Without access to competitive benchmark data for these specific aircraft parts, it is impossible to definitively state how the $34.7M price compares to market rates. However, the absence of competition inherently raises concerns that the price may be higher than what could have been achieved through a competitive bidding process.

What is the potential risk to national security if these parts are not procured efficiently and cost-effectively?

Inefficient and non-cost-effective procurement of critical aircraft parts can lead to budget overruns, diverting funds from other essential defense programs. Furthermore, reliance on sole-source contracts can create supply chain vulnerabilities and potentially impact the readiness and operational capability of defense assets if parts are delayed or become prohibitively expensive.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: SPRPA112QX403

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6200 JS MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63134

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $34,700,000

Exercised Options: $34,700,000

Current Obligation: $34,700,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SPM4AX11D9414

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-12-28

Current End Date: 2016-02-28

Potential End Date: 2016-02-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-08-28

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending