CACI INC - FEDERAL awarded $11.2M for IT products, with 4 bids received

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,256,640 ($11.3M)

Contractor: CACI Inc - Federal

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2001-07-02

End Date: 2006-06-30

Contract Duration: 1,824 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.2K/day

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: IT PRODUCTS

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTA, GEORGIA, 30330

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $11.3 million to CACI INC - FEDERAL for work described as: IT PRODUCTS Key points: 1. Analysis indicates a potentially competitive award given the number of bids. 2. The contract duration of 1824 days suggests a long-term need for these IT products. 3. Fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty but could limit flexibility. 4. The award was made under the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541512 points to Computer Systems Design Services. 6. The contract was awarded as 'Other' (AW: DO), which requires further clarification on its specific nature.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $11.2 million contract is challenging without specific details on the IT products procured and their unit costs. However, the duration of nearly five years suggests a significant investment. Comparing it to similar IT product procurements from the General Services Administration would provide better context for assessing value for money. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator of value if the price was competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract received 4 bids, indicating a degree of competition. However, the specific nature of the 'limited' competition is not detailed. It's unclear if this was a pre-qualified list, a specific solicitation type, or if other potential bidders were excluded. A higher number of bids generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: With 4 bids, taxpayers likely benefited from some level of price competition, preventing a sole-source situation. However, the extent of savings compared to a broader competition is unknown.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring IT products and computer systems design services are the primary beneficiaries. The contract supports the delivery of essential IT products and related design services. The contract was awarded to a firm based in Georgia (SN: GEORGIA), suggesting potential regional economic impact. The workforce implications are tied to the IT sector, potentially supporting jobs in computer systems design and related fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed product specifications makes it difficult to assess if the most cost-effective solutions were procured.
The 'Other' award type (AW: DO) requires further investigation to understand potential risks or limitations.
The duration of the contract could lead to technology obsolescence if not managed proactively.

Positive Signals

The firm fixed-price contract type shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor.
Receiving 4 bids suggests a competitive process was at least partially successful.
The contract is managed by the General Services Administration, a central procurement agency known for established processes.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. The IT market is vast and constantly evolving, with significant government spending. This contract likely supports a specific agency's IT infrastructure or operational needs. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other GSA schedules or direct IT procurements for similar services and product categories.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (SB: false) was not a primary focus for this specific award, nor was it a small business set-aside (SS: false). This suggests the contract was likely awarded to a larger prime contractor. There is no information provided on subcontracting plans, so the impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear but likely minimal unless CACI INC - FEDERAL actively engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA) and the contracting agency utilizing the services. The firm fixed-price nature provides some level of cost control. Transparency is dependent on public contract databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules
IT Products and Services Procurement
Computer Systems Design Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for technology obsolescence due to contract length.
Ambiguity in 'AW: DO' award type requires clarification.
Limited insight into specific IT products procured.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $11.3 million to CACI INC - FEDERAL. IT PRODUCTS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI INC - FEDERAL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2001-07-02. End: 2006-06-30.

What specific IT products were procured under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'IT PRODUCTS' and falls under NAICS code 541512 (Computer Systems Design Services). However, the specific types of IT products are not detailed. This could range from hardware (servers, workstations, networking equipment) to software licenses, or even integrated IT solutions. Without this granular detail, it's impossible to assess the appropriateness of the technology procured or benchmark pricing effectively. Further investigation into the contract's statement of work or line item details would be necessary.

How does the $11.2 million value compare to similar IT product procurements by the GSA?

Comparing the $11.2 million value requires context regarding the specific IT products and the contract's duration (1824 days, approximately 5 years). For a 5-year contract, this averages around $2.24 million per year. The GSA procures a vast array of IT products and services through various vehicles, including MAS schedules and other contract types. To assess value, one would need to identify comparable procurements for similar product categories (e.g., enterprise hardware, specific software suites) awarded over similar timeframes by the GSA or other agencies. Without such comparisons, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents good or poor value.

What are the potential risks associated with a 5-year firm fixed-price IT products contract?

A significant risk with a long-term (5-year) firm fixed-price IT contract is technology obsolescence. IT evolves rapidly, and products procured at the beginning of the contract may be outdated or unsupported by the end. The firm fixed-price nature means the government is locked into the agreed price, potentially overpaying if market prices decrease or if the initial pricing was not competitive. Conversely, the contractor bears the risk of cost increases, which they may have factored into the initial price, potentially inflating it. Effective contract management, including regular reviews and potential modification clauses for technology refreshes, is crucial to mitigate these risks.

What does the 'AW: DO' award type signify for this contract?

The 'AW: DO' designation typically signifies an award made under the 'Other' category within certain procurement systems or reporting frameworks. This is often used when a contract doesn't neatly fit into standard categories like 'Competitive Acquisition' or 'Sole Source.' It could imply a non-standard procurement method, a specific type of task order, or a classification used by the awarding agency (General Services Administration in this case) for internal tracking. Understanding the precise meaning of 'DO' requires consulting the GSA's procurement regulations or internal guidelines. It necessitates further inquiry to determine the implications for competition, pricing, and oversight.

What is CACI INC - FEDERAL's track record with GSA IT contracts?

CACI INC - FEDERAL is a large, established government contractor with a significant presence in the IT services and solutions space. They frequently hold contracts with various federal agencies, including those managed through the General Services Administration. Their track record typically involves a wide range of IT support, systems integration, cybersecurity, and software development services. While this specific contract is for IT products, CACI's broader experience suggests they possess the capability to manage such procurements. A deeper dive into their contract history, performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS), and past performance on similar GSA awards would provide a more precise assessment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc (UEI: 045534641)

Address: 1100 N. GLEBE RD, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $92,461,179

Exercised Options: $92,461,179

Current Obligation: $11,256,640

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS07T00BGD0058

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline