DoD Awards $37.8M for Rotary Wing Blade Parts to Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $37,827,731 ($37.8M)

Contractor: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-08-19

End Date: 2028-12-12

Contract Duration: 2,307 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: NOUN:BLADE, ROTARY WING NSN:1615-01-6918821 PN:70070-10052-041

Place of Performance

Location: STRATFORD, GREATER BRIDGEPORT County, CONNECTICUT, 06615

State: Connecticut Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $37.8 million to SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION for work described as: NOUN:BLADE, ROTARY WING NSN:1615-01-6918821 PN:70070-10052-041 Key points: 1. This award represents a significant investment in critical aircraft components. 2. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation is a major player in the aerospace and defense sector. 3. The contract's 'not competed' status raises questions about potential price efficiencies. 4. Spending is concentrated within the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $37.8M for rotary wing blade parts appears substantial. Without specific unit cost data or benchmarks for similar components, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing against industry standards or historical data for comparable parts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition scenario. This approach can limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs compared to a fully competitive environment.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in taxpayers paying a premium for these essential aircraft parts.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operational readiness for rotary wing aircraft. Supports a key defense contractor and its supply chain. Potential for increased costs due to non-competitive award. Highlights reliance on specific manufacturers for specialized parts.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical defense needs
  • Award to established manufacturer

Sector Analysis

This award falls under the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector, a critical segment supporting the aerospace industry. Spending benchmarks for specialized aircraft components can vary widely based on technological complexity and market dynamics.

Small Business Impact

The awardee, Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, is a large business. There is no indication in the provided data that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Defense, through the Defense Logistics Agency, is responsible for overseeing this contract. The 'not competed' nature warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and value for taxpayer dollars.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Logistics Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of transparency in price justification
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Long-term contract duration without re-competition

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ct, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $37.8 million to SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION. NOUN:BLADE, ROTARY WING NSN:1615-01-6918821 PN:70070-10052-041

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $37.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-08-19. End: 2028-12-12.

What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps were taken to ensure the best possible price was obtained?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves factors such as unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or the absence of adequate competition. The agency should have conducted a thorough market research and price analysis to validate the necessity of a sole-source approach and to establish a fair and reasonable price, potentially through negotiation or comparison with similar, albeit not identical, procurements.

How does the per-unit cost of these rotary wing blade parts compare to similar components procured competitively by other military branches or allied nations?

A comprehensive comparison of per-unit costs against competitively procured similar components is essential for assessing value. This would involve identifying comparable parts, analyzing their specifications, and factoring in differences in volume, technology, and supplier. Without such comparative data, it is challenging to determine if the current pricing reflects market competitiveness or potential overpayment.

What is the long-term strategy for ensuring competitive sourcing of these critical aircraft parts to mitigate future cost increases and supply chain risks?

The long-term strategy should focus on fostering competition where feasible. This could involve encouraging new entrants, developing alternative specifications, or breaking down large procurements into smaller, more competitive lots. Proactive market analysis and engagement with potential suppliers are crucial to avoid sole-source dependencies and ensure sustained availability and cost-effectiveness of critical components.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp

Address: 6900 MAIN ST, STRATFORD, CT, 06614

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $37,827,731

Exercised Options: $37,827,731

Current Obligation: $37,827,731

Actual Outlays: $105,077

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $3,531,391

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SPE4AX15D9423

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2022-08-19

Current End Date: 2028-12-12

Potential End Date: 2028-12-12 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-07-15

More Contracts from Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation

View all Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending