DoD Awards Boeing $5.5M for PBL Material, Raising Concerns Over Limited Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,531,202 ($5.5M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-12-15

End Date: 2026-12-28

Contract Duration: 1,109 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 8510327585!PBL MATERIAL BOEING

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $5.5 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: 8510327585!PBL MATERIAL BOEING Key points: 1. Significant award to a single, large defense contractor. 2. Lack of competition may lead to suboptimal pricing. 3. Potential for taxpayer funds to be used inefficiently. 4. Focus on aircraft parts manufacturing within the defense sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The award of $5.5M to Boeing for PBL material lacks a clear benchmark for comparison due to its specific nature and limited competition. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to assess if the pricing is optimal or reflects market value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was not competed, indicating a limited source selection. This approach bypasses the price discovery benefits of a competitive bidding process, potentially resulting in higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition limits the government's ability to secure the best possible price, potentially leading to a less efficient use of taxpayer dollars.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for essential aircraft parts due to a lack of competitive bidding. Reliance on a single large contractor can create vulnerabilities in the supply chain. The Department of Defense's procurement strategy warrants scrutiny for cost-effectiveness.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for overpricing
  • Sole-source award

Positive Signals

  • Award to established contractor
  • Clear contract duration

Sector Analysis

This award falls within the Defense sector, specifically for aircraft parts manufacturing. Spending in this area is critical for military readiness, but competitive procurement is essential to manage costs effectively.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded directly to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor, with no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' designation suggests a potential lapse in competitive oversight. Further review is needed to understand the justification for this limited source selection and ensure accountability.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Logistics Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for price inflation
  • Limited transparency in pricing
  • Reliance on a single supplier

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, mo, delivery-order, 1m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $5.5 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. 8510327585!PBL MATERIAL BOEING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-12-15. End: 2026-12-28.

What is the justification for not competing this award, and what is the process for determining if a sole-source or limited-source award is truly necessary?

Justification for non-competitive awards typically involves factors like unique capabilities, urgent needs, or the unavailability of alternatives. Agencies must follow strict Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) guidelines, often requiring detailed documentation and justification for limiting competition. This process aims to ensure that such awards are only used when genuinely unavoidable and in the best interest of the government.

How does the government ensure fair and reasonable pricing when a contract is not competed, especially with a large, established contractor like Boeing?

When competition is limited, the government relies on 'price analysis' techniques rather than 'cost analysis' from multiple bidders. This involves comparing the proposed price to historical prices for the same or similar items, catalog prices, or prices paid by other government agencies or commercial customers. Certified Cost or Pricing Data may be required for larger awards to ensure transparency and reasonableness.

What are the long-term implications for the defense supply chain and cost management if non-competitive awards to major contractors become a common practice?

A trend towards non-competitive awards can stifle innovation and reduce cost-consciousness among contractors, potentially leading to sustained higher prices for defense articles and services. It can also create dependencies on specific suppliers, increasing supply chain risks. Over time, this could negatively impact the overall efficiency and affordability of national defense.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6200 JAMES S MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63134

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,531,202

Exercised Options: $5,531,202

Current Obligation: $5,531,202

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 15

Total Subaward Amount: $2,175,291

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SPRPA121D9002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-12-15

Current End Date: 2026-12-28

Potential End Date: 2026-12-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-09

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending