DoD awards $115M to Boeing for performance-based support, raising questions on competition and value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $115,393,602 ($115.4M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2018-04-10

End Date: 2019-06-09

Contract Duration: 425 days

Daily Burn Rate: $271.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 8505323388!PERFORMANCE BASED SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63134

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $115.4 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: 8505323388!PERFORMANCE BASED SUPPORT Key points: 1. Significant contract value awarded to a single, large defense contractor. 2. Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and limited innovation. 3. Performance-based contract structure aims for efficiency, but oversight is crucial. 4. Sector context: Defense Logistics Agency relies on established prime contractors for critical aircraft parts.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $115M is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price reflects fair market value compared to similar performance-based support contracts for aircraft parts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to The Boeing Company. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition could lead to inflated prices, directly impacting taxpayer funds allocated to defense spending.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the lack of competitive bidding. Reliance on a single contractor could create vulnerabilities in the supply chain. The effectiveness of performance-based metrics in ensuring optimal value needs close monitoring.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Sole-source award
  • High contract value

Positive Signals

  • Performance-based contract structure

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically for aircraft parts. Spending benchmarks in this area are often high due to specialized requirements and R&D costs, but competition is key to controlling these expenses.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor, and there is no indication of small business participation. This award does not appear to support small business goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Given the sole-source nature of this award, robust oversight by the Defense Logistics Agency is essential to ensure performance standards are met and costs are justified. Tracking key performance indicators will be critical.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Logistics Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competitive bidding
  • Sole-source award
  • High contract value without clear justification
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Limited small business participation

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, mo, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $115.4 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. 8505323388!PERFORMANCE BASED SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $115.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-04-10. End: 2019-06-09.

What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps were taken to ensure fair pricing?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. A sole-source award typically requires a justification, such as the unique capabilities of the contractor or urgent need. Without this justification, it's impossible to assess the fairness of the pricing or the necessity of avoiding competition. Further investigation into the contract file is needed.

How does the performance of Boeing on this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar support services, and what are the risks if performance falters?

The contract is performance-based, suggesting metrics are in place. However, without access to those specific metrics and Boeing's historical performance data, a direct comparison is difficult. Risks if performance falters include potential mission delays, increased operational costs for the DoD, and the challenge of finding an alternative provider quickly due to the sole-source nature.

What is the long-term strategic impact of awarding such a significant contract without competition on the overall defense supply chain for aircraft parts?

Awarding a large contract like this without competition can stifle innovation and reduce market pressure on pricing for other potential suppliers. It reinforces the dominance of incumbent contractors, potentially leading to less resilient supply chains and higher costs over time. This could limit the DoD's flexibility in sourcing critical parts in the future.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6200 JS MCDONNELL BLVD, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63134

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $115,393,602

Exercised Options: $115,393,602

Current Obligation: $115,393,602

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 367

Total Subaward Amount: $92,372,188

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SPRPA114D002U

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2018-04-10

Current End Date: 2019-06-09

Potential End Date: 2019-06-09 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2020-02-12

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending