DoD's $30.5M aviation turbine fuel contract awarded to QatarEnergy amid full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $30,492,770 ($30.5M)
Contractor: Qatarenergy
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-01-27
End Date: 2023-01-27
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT
Sector: Other
Official Description: 8509618264!TURBINE FUEL,AVIATION
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $30.5 million to QATARENERGY for work described as: 8509618264!TURBINE FUEL,AVIATION Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant portion of annual spending in this niche fuel market. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive pricing environment. 3. Fixed-price with economic price adjustment contract type introduces some cost volatility. 4. Awarded by the Defense Logistics Agency, indicating a critical supply chain role. 5. Contract duration is short, suggesting a need for frequent re-evaluation of market conditions. 6. Focus on aviation fuel highlights its importance for military readiness and operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $30.5 million for aviation turbine fuel is substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts is challenging without more specific details on fuel type, volume, and delivery locations. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment (FPEPA) structure means the final cost could fluctuate, making direct comparison difficult. However, the fact that it was awarded under full and open competition suggests that the pricing was deemed acceptable relative to market conditions at the time of award.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment. The presence of multiple bidders, if applicable, would typically drive prices down and encourage innovation, leading to better value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a wider range of offers and competitive pricing.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its aviation units, ensuring access to critical fuel for operations. Services delivered include the supply of aviation turbine fuel, essential for aircraft maintenance and flight readiness. Geographic impact is likely global, depending on where DoD aviation assets are deployed and require refueling. Workforce implications are minimal for the direct contract award, but it supports the broader defense logistics and aviation maintenance workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Economic price adjustment clause introduces potential for cost overruns if fuel prices rise significantly.
- Reliance on a single awardee for a critical commodity like aviation fuel could pose supply chain risks if not managed proactively.
- Short contract duration may lead to frequent re-competition and associated administrative overhead.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process and potential for competitive pricing.
- The Defense Logistics Agency's involvement indicates established procurement and oversight processes for fuel acquisition.
- Fixed-price component provides some cost certainty, with adjustments limited by the economic price adjustment clause.
Sector Analysis
The petroleum refining industry (NAICS 324110) is a critical sector supporting global energy needs, including significant demand from the defense sector. The market for aviation turbine fuel is specialized, with a limited number of large-scale producers and distributors capable of meeting stringent military specifications. Spending in this category is often driven by operational tempo and geopolitical factors. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within the broader DoD fuel procurement categories, which can run into billions annually.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. The awardee, QatarEnergy, is a large state-owned enterprise. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this specific award. The focus is on large-scale fuel supply, which typically involves major industry players.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), which is responsible for procuring and distributing fuel for the DoD. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and the fixed-price with economic price adjustment clauses. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Logistics Agency Fuel Procurement
- Department of Defense Aviation Operations
- Strategic Petroleum Reserve
- Global Fuel Markets
Risk Flags
- Potential for price volatility due to economic price adjustment clause.
- Concentration risk associated with a single awardee for a critical commodity.
- Geopolitical factors impacting supply from the Middle East region.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, aviation-fuel, turbine-fuel, fixed-price-economic-price-adjustment, full-and-open-competition, defense-logistics-agency, qatar, energy, commodity
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $30.5 million to QATARENERGY. 8509618264!TURBINE FUEL,AVIATION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is QATARENERGY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $30.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-01-27. End: 2023-01-27.
What is the historical spending pattern for aviation turbine fuel by the Department of Defense?
The Department of Defense is a massive consumer of aviation turbine fuel, with annual spending often reaching billions of dollars. Historical data indicates consistent and substantial procurement to support global operations, training, and readiness. Spending fluctuates based on geopolitical events, military deployments, and changes in fuel prices. The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) manages the majority of these procurements, often utilizing a mix of contract types and competition levels to ensure supply chain resilience and cost-effectiveness. Analyzing trends over the past decade reveals a steady demand, with significant spikes during periods of heightened military activity. The specific contract in question, valued at $30.5 million, represents a single award within this larger, ongoing procurement effort.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for aviation turbine fuel?
Determining the precise competitiveness of the awarded price is challenging without access to the specific bid data and detailed market analysis conducted by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) at the time of award. The contract uses a Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FPEPA) structure, meaning the final price paid can vary from the initial fixed component based on fluctuations in fuel market indices. While the award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a degree of market competitiveness, the economic price adjustment introduces a variable. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare the 'fixed' portion of the price against prevailing market rates for similar fuel grades (e.g., JP-8, Jet A-1) in the relevant delivery regions, adjusted for transportation and any specific military-grade requirements. Publicly available data often lacks this granular detail for specific contract awards.
What are the potential risks associated with relying on QatarEnergy for this fuel supply?
Potential risks associated with relying on QatarEnergy, a state-owned enterprise, for aviation turbine fuel include geopolitical considerations, supply chain disruptions, and potential shifts in national energy policies. While Qatar is a stable energy producer, international relations can impact trade agreements and supply routes. Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East could theoretically affect production or transit. Furthermore, as a single awardee for this specific contract, the DoD faces concentration risk; any disruption to QatarEnergy's operations or export capacity could impact fuel availability. The economic price adjustment clause, while intended to manage price volatility, also introduces a risk of higher-than-anticipated costs if global energy markets experience significant price surges.
What is the significance of the 'Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment' contract type for this fuel purchase?
The 'Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment' (FPEPA) contract type is commonly used for commodities like fuel where market prices are volatile. For this $30.5 million aviation turbine fuel contract, it means a portion of the price is fixed, providing some cost certainty for the government. However, the 'economic price adjustment' clause allows for modifications to the price based on fluctuations in specified economic indicators, typically related to the cost of raw materials (crude oil) and refining processes. This structure aims to protect both the contractor from unforeseen cost increases and the government from paying excessively high prices if market conditions stabilize or decrease. It balances cost control with the need to secure supply in a fluctuating market, but requires careful monitoring of the adjustment indices.
How does this contract contribute to the Department of Defense's overall fuel security and readiness?
This contract plays a direct role in ensuring the Department of Defense's (DoD) fuel security and readiness by securing a supply of critical aviation turbine fuel. Aviation fuel is indispensable for the operation of fighter jets, bombers, transport aircraft, and helicopters, which are vital for power projection, troop mobility, and logistical support. By awarding this contract, the DoD ensures that its aviation assets have the necessary fuel to conduct training exercises, respond to contingencies, and maintain operational readiness globally. The Defense Logistics Agency's (DLA) role in managing such procurements underscores the strategic importance of fuel supply chains for national defense. Consistent access to fuel directly impacts the DoD's ability to execute its missions effectively.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing › Petroleum Refineries
Product/Service Code: FUELS, LUBRICANTS, OILS, WAXES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: WORLD TRADE CENTER, AL DAFNA AREA, DOHA
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $30,492,770
Exercised Options: $30,492,770
Current Obligation: $30,492,770
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: SPE60222D0454
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-01-27
Current End Date: 2023-01-27
Potential End Date: 2023-01-27 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-10-13
More Contracts from Qatarenergy
- 8509426058!turbine Fuel,Aviation — $43.3M (Department of Defense)
- 8509426058!turbine Fuel,Aviation — $37.4M (Department of Defense)
- 8509575947!turbine Fuel,Aviation — $33.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)