DoD awards Boeing $30M for Aircraft Manufacturing, raising concerns over competition and value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,091,422 ($30.1M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-09-18

End Date: 2017-03-27

Contract Duration: 1,286 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF 1760 EMD

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73135

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $30.1 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF 1760 EMD Key points: 1. Significant contract awarded to a single, large vendor. 2. Limited transparency on pricing due to 'Cost Plus Incentive Fee' structure. 3. Long duration and high value warrant close scrutiny. 4. Potential for cost overruns exists with incentive fee contracts.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The 'Cost Plus Incentive Fee' contract type makes direct value assessment difficult without detailed cost breakdowns. The benchmark for similar aircraft manufacturing contracts is not readily available, but the lack of competition suggests potential for inflated pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This significantly limits price discovery and negotiation leverage for the government, potentially leading to higher costs than if multiple vendors had bid.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition and potentially less efficient pricing mechanisms could result in higher taxpayer expenditure than necessary for these aircraft manufacturing services.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the absence of competitive bidding. The long contract duration could tie up significant defense resources. Reliance on a single large contractor raises concerns about supply chain resilience.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Lack of competition
  • High contract value

Positive Signals

  • Awarded to established vendor
  • Contract completed

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Aircraft Manufacturing sector, a critical area for defense spending. Benchmarks for similar sole-source, cost-plus contracts in this sector often show higher costs compared to competed ones.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'Cost Plus Incentive Fee' structure requires robust oversight to ensure contractor performance and cost control. The lack of competition necessitates increased vigilance from the Department of Defense to prevent potential waste.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Limited transparency on pricing
  • High contract value

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ok, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $30.1 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. IGF::OT::IGF 1760 EMD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-09-18. End: 2017-03-27.

What specific performance metrics were used to justify the incentive fee structure, and how were they monitored?

The provided data does not detail the specific performance metrics tied to the incentive fee. Effective oversight would require the agency to have clearly defined, measurable objectives for Boeing, along with a rigorous system for tracking progress against these goals to ensure fair incentive payouts and taxpayer value.

What was the rationale for not competing this significant contract, and were alternatives explored?

The data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED,' suggesting a sole-source justification. Without further information, it's unclear if this was due to unique capabilities, urgent need, or other factors. A thorough review would be needed to confirm if competitive alternatives were genuinely unavailable or if the sole-source path was chosen for expediency.

How does the final cost compare to initial estimates, considering the incentive fee structure?

The data does not provide initial estimates or final cost comparisons. A 'Cost Plus Incentive Fee' contract aims to align contractor and government interests, but without post-award financial reporting, it's impossible to assess if the incentives effectively controlled costs or if the final price was reasonable relative to performance achieved.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6001 S AIR DEPOT BLVD, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK, 73135

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $38,004,218

Exercised Options: $37,144,234

Current Obligation: $30,091,422

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 17

Total Subaward Amount: $1,641,669

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA862810D1000

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2013-09-18

Current End Date: 2017-03-27

Potential End Date: 2017-03-27 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-07-22

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending