DoD's $44.2M Boeing Contract for QEC Kits: Aircraft Manufacturing Spending Under Scrutiny

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $44,214,572 ($44.2M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-08-06

End Date: 2015-03-13

Contract Duration: 949 days

Daily Burn Rate: $46.6K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: CV0634- FY10 QEC KITS

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTINGTON BEACH, ORANGE County, CALIFORNIA, 92647

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $44.2 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: CV0634- FY10 QEC KITS Key points: 1. High contract value ($44.2M) for aircraft manufacturing components. 2. Sole-source award to Boeing raises questions about competition. 3. Potential risk due to lack of competitive bidding and fixed-price structure. 4. Significant taxpayer investment in specialized aircraft parts.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $44.2M for QEC kits is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to potential market rates for similar aircraft manufacturing components.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis to The Boeing Company, indicating a lack of competition. This method may limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition in this sole-source award means taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible price for these critical aircraft components.

Public Impact

Taxpayers funded a significant sole-source contract for aircraft parts. The Department of the Air Force relied on a single vendor, Boeing. The contract duration of 949 days suggests a long-term need for these kits.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • Fixed-price contract

Positive Signals

  • Awarded to a major defense contractor
  • Specific need for QEC kits

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Aircraft Manufacturing sector, a critical area for defense spending. Benchmarks for similar sole-source contracts in this sector are hard to establish without competitive data, but large values warrant scrutiny.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor. There is no indication that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this specific delivery order.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award suggests limited oversight on price competitiveness. Further review would be needed to confirm if justification for sole-sourcing was adequately documented and approved.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award limits price competition.
  • Potential for overpayment due to lack of competitive bidding.
  • Fixed-price contract may not account for unforeseen cost efficiencies.
  • Lack of transparency regarding the justification for sole-sourcing.
  • Dependency on a single supplier for critical aircraft components.

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ca, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $44.2 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. CV0634- FY10 QEC KITS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $44.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-08-06. End: 2015-03-13.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis to Boeing, and were alternative sources considered?

The provided data indicates a sole-source award, meaning alternatives were likely not pursued or deemed unsuitable. A thorough review would require access to the contract file to understand the specific justification, such as unique capabilities, urgent need, or lack of other qualified sources, and to verify if the government adequately explored competition.

How does the $44.2M contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar QEC kits, especially considering the fixed-price nature?

Without competitive bids or access to detailed cost breakdowns, comparing this $44.2M fixed-price contract to industry benchmarks is challenging. The lack of competition inherently limits price discovery. A benchmark analysis would require data from similar sole-source or competitively awarded contracts for comparable QEC kits.

What is the long-term strategic value and potential obsolescence risk associated with these QEC kits purchased under this contract?

The long-term strategic value depends on the operational necessity and lifespan of the aircraft platforms these QEC kits support. Potential obsolescence risk is a concern for any specialized component, especially if technology evolves rapidly. Understanding the sustainment plan and upgrade path for the associated aircraft is crucial.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5301 BOLSA AVE, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA, 92647

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $44,214,572

Exercised Options: $44,214,572

Current Obligation: $44,214,572

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA852612D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-08-06

Current End Date: 2015-03-13

Potential End Date: 2015-03-13 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-06-01

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending