DoD Awards $110M for C-17 LAIRCM Kits to Boeing, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $109,843,294 ($109.8M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-02-07

End Date: 2017-12-31

Contract Duration: 2,154 days

Daily Burn Rate: $51.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ACAT II C-17 LAIRCM KITS

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTINGTON BEACH, ORANGE County, CALIFORNIA, 92647

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $109.8 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: ACAT II C-17 LAIRCM KITS Key points: 1. Significant spending on critical aircraft defense systems. 2. Sole-source award to Boeing raises competition concerns. 3. High value contract with potential for price escalation. 4. Focus on aircraft manufacturing sector, specifically defense. 5. Long contract duration of over 2000 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $109.8 million for C-17 LAIRCM kits is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price represents fair market value compared to similar systems or potential alternatives.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to The Boeing Company. This lack of competition limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for this significant defense contract means taxpayers may be paying a premium for the LAIRCM kits, as there was no market pressure to drive down prices.

Public Impact

Enhances survivability of C-17 aircraft against missile threats. Supports ongoing military operations and readiness. Potential impact on future defense procurement strategies. Long-term sustainment and upgrade implications.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Sole-source award
  • High contract value
  • Long duration

Positive Signals

  • Critical defense system
  • Supports military readiness

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically Aircraft Manufacturing. Spending benchmarks for similar advanced defense systems can vary widely, but sole-source awards often exceed competitive pricing.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor. There is no indication of small business participation in this specific award, suggesting limited opportunities for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). Oversight effectiveness is difficult to gauge without further information on the justification for the sole-source award and price negotiation.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competitive bidding
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Limited transparency in award justification
  • Risk of contractor dependency
  • Long-term contract duration may not reflect evolving needs

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ca, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $109.8 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. ACAT II C-17 LAIRCM KITS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $109.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-02-07. End: 2017-12-31.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative solutions considered?

The justification for a sole-source award is crucial for understanding the necessity of bypassing competition. Without this information, it's impossible to determine if the government adequately explored options that could have fostered competition or secured better pricing. This lack of transparency raises concerns about potential inefficiencies and the optimal use of taxpayer funds.

How does the per-unit cost of these LAIRCM kits compare to industry benchmarks or previous procurements, especially given the sole-source nature?

Assessing the per-unit cost against benchmarks is challenging without competitive data. Sole-source contracts often lack the downward price pressure inherent in competitive bidding. If this contract's unit cost is significantly higher than comparable systems or historical data, it could indicate a lack of cost-effectiveness and potential overspending by the government.

What measures are in place to ensure the effectiveness and timely delivery of these critical defense systems under a sole-source arrangement?

Ensuring effectiveness and timely delivery under a sole-source contract relies heavily on robust government oversight and contract management. Clear performance metrics, regular progress reviews, and strong communication channels with the sole contractor are essential. Without these, there's an increased risk of delays, quality issues, or cost overruns that could impact military readiness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5301 BOLSA AVE, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA, 92647

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $109,843,294

Exercised Options: $109,843,294

Current Obligation: $109,843,294

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA852612D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-02-07

Current End Date: 2017-12-31

Potential End Date: 2017-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-06-01

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending