DoD Awards $35.3M for Aircraft Engines, Lockheed Martin Selected in Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $35,275,620 ($35.3M)

Contractor: Kelly Aviation Center, L.P.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2000-02-23

End Date: 2010-09-15

Contract Duration: 3,857 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200005!5700!000452!GF40 !SAN ANTONIO ALC/LPK !F3460199D0002 !A!*!SA01 !20000223!20000531!019603534!948604350!834951691!N!1FGL4!LOCKHEED MARTIN LOGISTICS MANA!7102 MOUNTAIN GRV !SAN ANTONIO !TX!78250!65000!029!48!SAN ANTONIO !BEXAR !TEXAS !0001!+000017692701!N!N!000000000000!2840!GAS TURBINES AND JET ENGINES, ACFT & COMPS !A1B!AIRCRAFT ENGINES AND SPARES !3BSJ!TF-39 !3724!5!A!S!*!B!A!*!A !N!J!2!006!B!* !A!N!Z!* !* !Y!C!*!A!A!A!A!A!A!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Place of Performance

Location: SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78226, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $35.3 million to KELLY AVIATION CENTER, L.P. for work described as: 200005!5700!000452!GF40 !SAN ANTONIO ALC/LPK !F3460199D0002 !A!*!SA01 !20000223!20000531!019603534!948604350!834951691!N!1FGL4!LOCKHEED MARTIN LOGISTICS MANA!7102 MOUNTAIN GRV !SAN ANTONIO !TX!78250!65000!029!48!SAN ANTONIO !BEX… Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $35.3 million for aircraft engines. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating market availability. 3. Potential risk associated with long contract duration (2000-2010). 4. Sector focus on Aircraft Engine Manufacturing, a critical defense component.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $35.3 million for aircraft engines appears reasonable given the 10-year duration. Benchmarking against similar, long-term engine contracts would provide a more precise assessment of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors were considered. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

Ensures continued availability of critical aircraft engine components for military operations. Supports the defense industrial base and associated manufacturing jobs. Long-term nature of the contract may indicate a stable demand for these specific engine parts.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Long contract duration (2000-2010) could lead to price escalation or obsolescence risks.
  • Reliance on a single awardee for a critical component over a decade.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
  • Contract supports a vital defense manufacturing sector.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing sector, a key area for defense readiness. Spending in this sector is often characterized by high R&D costs and long product lifecycles.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate specific participation or subcontracting by small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement in this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. However, the long duration warrants ongoing monitoring for performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

  • Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration (10 years)
  • Potential for price escalation over the contract term
  • Risk of technological obsolescence
  • Dependence on a single awardee for critical components

Tags

aircraft-engine-and-engine-parts-manufac, department-of-defense, tx, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $35.3 million to KELLY AVIATION CENTER, L.P.. 200005!5700!000452!GF40 !SAN ANTONIO ALC/LPK !F3460199D0002 !A!*!SA01 !20000223!20000531!019603534!948604350!834951691!N!1FGL4!LOCKHEED MARTIN LOGISTICS MANA!7102 MOUNTAIN GRV !SAN ANTONIO !TX!78250!65000!029!48!SAN ANTONIO !BEXAR !TEXAS !0001!+000017692701!N!N!000000000000!2840!GAS TURBINES AND JET ENGINES, ACFT & COMPS !A1B!AIRCRAFT ENGINES AND SPARES !3BSJ!TF-39 !3724!5!A!S!*!B!A!*!A !N!J!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KELLY AVIATION CENTER, L.P..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $35.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-02-23. End: 2010-09-15.

What was the specific type of aircraft engine or component procured, and how critical is it to current military aviation fleets?

The contract specifies 'GAS TURBINES AND JET ENGINES, ACFT & COMPS' and 'AIRCRAFT ENGINES AND SPARES' with a specific part number 'TF-39'. The TF-39 engine is known for its use in heavy-lift aircraft like the C-5 Galaxy. Its criticality lies in maintaining the operational readiness of these strategic airlift assets, which are essential for global power projection and logistical support.

Given the 2000-2010 contract period, what were the potential risks related to technological obsolescence or evolving military requirements?

A decade-long contract for complex aerospace components like jet engines carries inherent risks of technological obsolescence. Military requirements can also shift significantly over such a period due to geopolitical changes or new doctrine. The government would need robust contract clauses for managing upgrades, modifications, or potential early termination if requirements changed drastically or superior technology emerged.

How does the awarded price of $35.3 million compare to industry benchmarks for similar engine procurements over that timeframe?

Without specific details on the quantity, model, and exact specifications of the TF-39 engines or spares procured, a precise benchmark comparison is challenging. However, given the TF-39's role in large military aircraft, $35.3 million spread over ten years for potentially numerous components or overhauls suggests a moderate annual expenditure. Further analysis would require access to historical pricing data for similar defense aerospace contracts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3523 GENERAL HUDNELL DR STE 213, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78226

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F3460199D0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2000-02-23

Current End Date: 2010-09-15

Potential End Date: 2010-09-15 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-08-24

More Contracts from Kelly Aviation Center, L.P.

View all Kelly Aviation Center, L.P. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending