DoD awards $49.3M to Northrop Grumman for Global Hawk interim repair, raising concerns about competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $49,329,916 ($49.3M)
Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-03-26
End Date: 2013-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,376 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.9K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: GLOBAL HAWK INTERIM REPAIR CAPABILITY
Place of Performance
Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92127, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $49.3 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: GLOBAL HAWK INTERIM REPAIR CAPABILITY Key points: 1. Significant contract value for specialized aircraft repair. 2. Sole-source award limits competitive pricing. 3. Potential for cost overruns due to lack of competition. 4. Aircraft manufacturing sector with high technical barriers.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $49.3M for interim repair services is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to potential market rates for similar specialized aircraft maintenance.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This approach bypasses the competitive process, potentially leading to higher prices and reduced innovation as the contractor faces no market pressure.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding, as the government did not explore alternative, potentially lower-cost solutions.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operational readiness for critical Global Hawk surveillance aircraft. Supports specialized jobs within the aerospace and defense industry. Highlights reliance on a single contractor for essential maintenance.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for cost creep
- Limited vendor options
Positive Signals
- Maintains critical asset readiness
- Supports specialized workforce
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Aircraft Manufacturing sector, characterized by high R&D costs and specialized technical expertise. Spending benchmarks in this area are often high due to the complexity of military aircraft maintenance.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, a large prime contractor. There is no indication of small business participation in this specific award, suggesting limited opportunities for smaller firms in this specialized repair work.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency. Oversight would focus on ensuring the contractor meets performance requirements and manages costs effectively, though the lack of competition limits price oversight.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Potential for inflated pricing
- Lack of competitive pressure
- Limited transparency on cost justification
Tags
aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ca, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $49.3 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. GLOBAL HAWK INTERIM REPAIR CAPABILITY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $49.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-03-26. End: 2013-12-31.
What is the justification for the sole-source award, and were alternative solutions considered?
The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of viable alternatives. Without further documentation, it's unclear if other qualified contractors were assessed or if specific circumstances necessitated awarding to Northrop Grumman without competition.
How will the government ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent overruns in the absence of competition?
In sole-source situations, cost-effectiveness is often managed through detailed cost analysis, negotiation, and robust contract surveillance. The government would likely scrutinize the contractor's cost proposals, labor rates, and material costs to identify potential areas for savings and prevent unwarranted price increases.
What is the long-term strategy for Global Hawk repair capabilities to ensure future competition and value?
The long-term strategy should involve market research to identify potential competitors, fostering competition through phased contract awards, or developing organic government capabilities. This ensures that future repair needs are met with competitive pricing and diverse vendor options, maximizing value for taxpayers.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ELECTRICAL/ELECTRONIC EQPT COMPNTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation (UEI: 967356127)
Address: 17066 GOLDENTOP RD., SAN DIEGO, CA, 92127
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $49,994,289
Exercised Options: $49,994,289
Current Obligation: $49,329,916
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA862008G3005
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-03-26
Current End Date: 2013-12-31
Potential End Date: 2013-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-08-17
More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
- 200506!000026!5700!fa8214!oo-Alc/Pkme/Lmke !F4261098C0001 !A!N! !Y! !p01502!20041213!20050701!001563738!004179453!016435559!n!northrop Grumman Space & Missi!888 S 2000 E !clearfield !ut!84015!13850!011!49!clearfield !davis !utah !-000001960000!n!n!000000000000!l014!tech REP Svcs/Guided Missiles !A2 !missile and Space Systems !302 !minuteman III GRP !541330!E! !3! ! !C! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!l!2!002!b! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $10.0B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-7) — $8.5B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-2) — $5.4B (Department of Defense)
- First DDT and E, Ares I-X, and Flight Tests. First Stage Will BE a Five Segment, Solid Rocket Booster Derived From the Space Shuttle Program (SSP) Solid Rocket Booster (srb)/Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (rsrm). the Contractor Shall Furnish the Necessary Management, Engineering, Labor, Facilities, Tools, Equipment, and Materials Required for First Stage Development, Qualification, Certification and Acceptance Program. Activities Include: Redesign and Testing of the Motor to Incorporate the Fifth Segment and Production of Five Full Scale Ground Static Test Motors: TWO Development Motors (dms)-And Three Qualification Motors (QMS); Structural Test Article (STA), Ground Vibration Test Motors (gvtms) and Other Development Testing; Redesign of the Avionics, Deceleration, Separation, and Flight Termination System (FTS) Subsystems; Ares I-X: Simulated Ares I Outer Mold Line/Mass Properties Using Modified Srb/Rsrm; and Three Flight Test Vehicles. TAS::80 0124::TAS — $4.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Federal Contract — $4.4B (Department of Defense)
View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)