DoD's $30.3M JCCE Support Contract Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,298,888 ($30.3M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-08-01

End Date: 2022-03-04

Contract Duration: 2,041 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF JCCE SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: DAHLGREN, KING GEORGE County, VIRGINIA, 22448

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $30.3 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF JCCE SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, well-established firm, Booz Allen Hamilton. 2. The contract spans over 6 years, indicating a long-term need for JCCE support. 3. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 4. The Wired Telecommunications Carriers NAICS code suggests a focus on network infrastructure and services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award amount is $30.3 million over approximately 6 years. Without specific per-unit cost data or comparison points for similar JCCE support services, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the duration and scope suggest a significant investment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing. The existence of multiple bidders and the selection process would have influenced the final price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through market forces.

Public Impact

Ensures continued support for Joint Command and Control Element (JCCE) systems, crucial for military operations. Supports the Department of the Air Force's technological infrastructure and operational readiness. The long-term nature of the contract provides stability for both the government and the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics or outcome-based evaluations.
Potential for cost creep over the long contract duration if not closely monitored.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical JCCE support.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Long-term contract provides stability and predictability.
Contractor is a well-established firm with a track record.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT and telecommunications sector, specifically supporting wired telecommunications carriers. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining robust communication networks essential for defense operations. Benchmarks for similar long-term support contracts in this sector can vary widely based on complexity and specific services.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, small businesses were likely not primary awardees, though they may have participated as subcontractors to Booz Allen Hamilton.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, implying oversight from relevant Air Force contracting and program management offices. Further oversight details, such as specific reporting requirements or independent reviews, are not provided in the data.

Related Government Programs

Wired Telecommunications Carriers
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may lead to price escalation or obsolescence if not managed.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes objective evaluation difficult.
Potential for contractor lock-in due to specialized JCCE support.
No indication of small business subcontracting goals or achievements.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $30.3 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. IGF::OT::IGF JCCE SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-08-01. End: 2022-03-04.

What specific JCCE capabilities does this contract support, and how do these align with current and future Air Force operational needs?

This contract likely supports the maintenance, upgrade, and operation of wired telecommunications infrastructure critical for Joint Command and Control Element (JCCE) functions. These capabilities are essential for enabling seamless communication and data sharing among different military branches and agencies during joint operations. The alignment with future needs would depend on the contract's scope for modernization and adaptation to evolving threats and technological advancements.

How does the $30.3 million cost compare to industry benchmarks for similar long-term JCCE support contracts, considering the firm-fixed-price structure?

Assessing the $30.3 million cost against industry benchmarks is challenging without detailed service breakdowns and performance metrics. However, a firm-fixed-price contract generally shifts cost risk to the contractor, implying the price reflects anticipated costs and profit. The duration of over six years suggests a significant scope, and comparison would require data on contracts with similar complexity, duration, and technological requirements within the defense sector.

What mechanisms are in place to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of Booz Allen Hamilton's support over the contract's 6-year duration?

While the data indicates a firm-fixed-price contract awarded under full and open competition, specific effectiveness and efficiency mechanisms are not detailed. Typically, such contracts would include performance standards, delivery schedules, and potentially incentives or penalties tied to meeting defined objectives. Regular program reviews and oversight by the Department of the Air Force would also be crucial for ensuring contractor performance and value realization.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Information › Wired and Wireless Telecommunications (except Satellite) › Wired Telecommunications Carriers

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $37,772,075

Exercised Options: $34,569,083

Current Obligation: $30,298,888

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 5

Total Subaward Amount: $459,144

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA873215D0034

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline