OPM awards $29M HR support contract to Team Carney, Inc. for professional development training

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,067,265 ($29.1M)

Contractor: Team Carney, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Office of Personnel Management

Start Date: 2012-06-04

End Date: 2013-09-30

Contract Duration: 483 days

Daily Burn Rate: $60.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: HR SUPPORT SERVICES (HC) IGF::CL::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20415, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Office of Personnel Management obligated $29.1 million to TEAM CARNEY, INC. for work described as: HR SUPPORT SERVICES (HC) IGF::CL::IGF Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating clear cost expectations. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a potentially competitive pricing environment. 3. Contract duration of 483 days implies a need for sustained support. 4. The contract falls under professional and management development training services. 5. Awarded by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), a key federal HR agency. 6. The contract value is approximately $29 million over its period of performance.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $29 million for a period of approximately 16 months appears to be within a reasonable range for comprehensive HR support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for professional development and management training is challenging without more granular data on the specific services provided. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the costs involved, which can be a positive indicator of value if the scope is well-defined and executed.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 3 bidders indicates a degree of competition, though the exact number of bids received is not specified. A full and open competition generally promotes price discovery and allows the government to select the best value offering, which could include a balance of price and technical merit.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple vendors to bid, potentially driving down prices and ensuring the government receives competitive offers.

Public Impact

Federal employees, particularly managers and professionals, are the primary beneficiaries through enhanced development and training opportunities. Services delivered include professional and management development training, aimed at improving workforce skills and leadership capabilities. The contract's geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia, where OPM is headquartered. Workforce implications include the potential for improved federal employee performance and career progression.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if training needs evolve significantly beyond the initial definition.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical HR development services could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
Award to a specific entity implies successful vetting of capabilities.

Sector Analysis

The federal HR support services sector is a significant market, encompassing a wide range of activities from recruitment to training and development. This contract fits within the professional and management development segment, which is crucial for maintaining a skilled and effective federal workforce. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar training initiatives can vary widely based on the scope, duration, and specific skill sets targeted.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears limited unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Office of Personnel Management's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and public reporting, though specific performance metrics may not always be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Federal Workforce Development Programs
Management and Leadership Training Initiatives
Human Capital Management Services

Risk Flags

Contract duration may indicate a need for ongoing services, requiring sustained funding.
Reliance on a single award for a significant training requirement could pose continuity risks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Office of Personnel Management awarded $29.1 million to TEAM CARNEY, INC.. HR SUPPORT SERVICES (HC) IGF::CL::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TEAM CARNEY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Office of Personnel Management (Office of Personnel Management).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-06-04. End: 2013-09-30.

What specific types of professional and management development training were included in this contract?

The provided data categorizes the contract under 'Professional and Management Development Training' (NAICS code 611430). However, it does not detail the specific curriculum, modalities (e.g., in-person, online, blended), or target audiences for the training. Typically, such contracts could encompass leadership development, supervisory skills, communication training, strategic planning workshops, and other areas aimed at enhancing the capabilities of federal managers and employees. A deeper dive into the contract's statement of work (SOW) would be necessary to ascertain the precise nature and scope of the training provided.

How does the $29 million contract value compare to historical OPM spending on similar HR support services?

Comparing the $29 million award to OPM's historical spending requires access to detailed historical contract data for similar HR support and training services. Without that granular data, it's difficult to establish a precise benchmark. However, OPM, as the central human resources agency for the federal government, consistently invests in workforce development. The value of this contract appears substantial, suggesting a significant scope or duration. Analyzing trends in OPM's training expenditures over several fiscal years would provide better context on whether this award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in such services.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Team Carney, Inc.'s performance under this contract?

The provided summary data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. In a firm-fixed-price contract for training services, KPIs often relate to the successful delivery of training sessions, participant satisfaction rates, achievement of learning objectives (measured through post-training assessments), adherence to schedules, and overall contractor responsiveness. The Office of Personnel Management would have established these metrics in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) to ensure the contractor met the required standards for professional and management development.

Were there any performance issues or contract modifications during the period of performance (June 2012 - September 2013)?

The provided data does not indicate any contract modifications or performance issues for this specific contract award. The contract was awarded on June 4, 2012, and had an end date of September 30, 2013, spanning approximately 16 months. Without access to the contract's official modification history or performance reports, it's impossible to determine if any changes were made to the scope, price, or schedule, or if any performance disputes arose during its execution.

What is the typical market rate for professional and management development training services of this scale?

Determining a precise 'typical market rate' for professional and management development training services of this scale ($29 million over ~16 months) is complex, as rates vary significantly based on the specific content, delivery method, number of participants, and contractor expertise. However, for large-scale federal training contracts, per-participant costs can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars, depending on the intensity and specialization of the training. The firm-fixed-price nature of this contract suggests OPM sought a defined package of services at a set cost, implying they had benchmarked or negotiated a price they deemed appropriate based on their requirements and market research.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Business Schools and Computer and Management Training › Professional and Management Development Training

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 N PITT ST STE 401, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,067,265

Exercised Options: $29,067,265

Current Obligation: $29,067,265

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: OPM020700045

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline