DoD Awards Booz Allen Hamilton $98.5M for Program Management/Support Services, Ending 2012

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $98,474,451 ($98.5M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-09-28

End Date: 2012-03-27

Contract Duration: 2,007 days

Daily Burn Rate: $49.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200612!SS6163!1700!N00039!SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !N0017804D4024 !A!N! !Y!NS18 ! !20060928!20070927!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN DIEGO !CALIFORNIA!+000003980000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !284 !JTRS WAVEFORM !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20090331!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!021!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! !1700!N00039!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $98.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: 200612!SS6163!1700!N00039!SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !N0017804D4024 !A!N! !Y!NS18 ! !20060928!20070927!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN … Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. for program management and support services. 2. The contract has a total value of $98,474,451.08 and spans from 2006 to 2012. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 4. The primary service category is Engineering Services (NAICS 541330).

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $98.5 million over several years appears reasonable for comprehensive program management and support services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale DoD contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing as multiple vendors are allowed to bid.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more favorable price for the services rendered.

Public Impact

Supports critical defense programs through essential management and support functions. Ensures continuity of operations for naval warfare systems. Contributes to the efficiency and effectiveness of defense procurement and execution.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Contract duration is long (2006-2012), potentially leading to scope creep or price escalation if not managed tightly.
  • Specific details on performance metrics and deliverables are not provided, making it hard to assess value for money.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
  • Booz Allen Hamilton is a well-established contractor with a track record in government services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically engineering services. Defense spending in this area is substantial, supporting complex military operations and technological development.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The award to a large, established contractor like Booz Allen Hamilton suggests that small business participation may have been limited in this specific contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Defense, through agencies like the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, is responsible for oversight. The contract's duration necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration
  • Lack of detailed performance metrics
  • Potential for scope creep
  • No explicit small business participation noted

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $98.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. 200612!SS6163!1700!N00039!SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !N0017804D4024 !A!N! !Y!NS18 ! !20060928!20070927!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!66000!073!06!SAN DIEGO !SAN DIEGO !CALIFORNIA!+000003980000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !284 !JTRS WAVEFORM !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $98.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-28. End: 2012-03-27.

What specific program management and support services were provided under this contract?

The contract focused on Program Management/Support Services for Space and Naval Warfare Systems. While the specific deliverables are not detailed here, such contracts typically involve planning, organizing, directing, and controlling resources to achieve program objectives, including technical support, logistics, and administrative functions.

What is the risk associated with the long contract duration and potential for cost overruns?

A contract spanning from 2006 to 2012 carries inherent risks of scope creep and cost escalation. Effective oversight, clear performance metrics, and robust change control processes are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives value for its investment.

How effectively did the full and open competition ensure optimal value for taxpayer dollars?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by fostering a competitive environment. The fact that this contract was awarded competitively suggests that multiple bidders likely submitted proposals, driving down prices and ensuring the government secured services at a reasonable cost relative to the market.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0002406R3502

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $104,249,395

Exercised Options: $83,042,951

Current Obligation: $98,474,451

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4024

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-09-28

Current End Date: 2012-03-27

Potential End Date: 2012-03-27 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-04-10

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending