DoD Awards $60.3M Contract for Automated Info System Design & Integration Services to Multimax Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,535,389 ($20.5M)

Contractor: Peraton Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-09-18

End Date: 2011-06-24

Contract Duration: 1,740 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200612!067149!1700!N00039!SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !FA877104D0003 !A!N! !Y!NS02 ! !20060918!20070918!602938771!602938771!602938771!N!MULTIMAX INC !13665 DULLES TECHNOLOGY DR!HERNDON !VA!20171!45825!033!24!LARGO !PRINCE GEORGE S !MARYLAND !+000001565833!N!N!000000000000!D307!AUTOMATED INFO SYSTEM DESIGN & INTEGRATION SVCS !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541519!A!A!5!B!M! !E!B!20090930!B!A!Y!A! !A!U!J!2!001!F! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!C!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! !1739!N00039!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: STERLING, LOUDOUN County, VIRGINIA, 20166

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.5 million to PERATON INC. for work described as: 200612!067149!1700!N00039!SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !FA877104D0003 !A!N! !Y!NS02 ! !20060918!20070918!602938771!602938771!602938771!N!MULTIMAX INC !13665 DULLES TECHNOLOGY DR!HERNDON !VA!20171!45825!033!24!LARGO !PRIN… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $60.3 million, was awarded by the Department of Defense. 2. The primary service is Automated Information System Design & Integration Services. 3. The contract was awarded under Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources. 4. The period of performance spans from September 18, 2006, to September 18, 2007, with potential extensions. 5. The contractor, Multimax Inc., is located in Herndon, Virginia.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $60.3 million for automated information system design and integration services appears to be within a reasonable range for similar government contracts. However, without specific details on the scope of work and deliverables, a precise comparison is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a competitive process but with specific source exclusions. This method can impact price discovery by potentially limiting the pool of bidders, though it aims for overall fairness.

Taxpayer Impact: The $60.3 million awarded represents taxpayer funds allocated for critical defense information system support. The effectiveness of the competition method in securing optimal value for money is a key consideration for taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

Supports critical Department of Defense information systems, ensuring operational readiness. The contract's duration and value suggest a significant, long-term project impacting defense infrastructure. Award to a Virginia-based company may have local economic benefits. The specific nature of 'Automated Info System Design & Integration' implies advanced technological services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns if scope expands beyond initial estimates.
  • Risk of vendor lock-in if integration is highly specialized.
  • Dependence on a single vendor for critical system development.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting potential for good value.
  • Focus on essential defense IT infrastructure.
  • Contractor located in a region with a strong federal contracting presence.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically focusing on system design and integration services for defense applications. Spending benchmarks in this area can vary widely based on complexity, but large-scale integration projects often represent significant investments.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms for its procurements. The specific agency overseeing this contract is the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, suggesting a dedicated oversight structure.

Related Government Programs

  • Wired Telecommunications Carriers
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for scope creep leading to cost increases.
  • Reliance on a single vendor for critical system integration.
  • Complexity of integrating automated systems in a defense environment.
  • Ensuring long-term system maintainability and upgradeability.

Tags

wired-telecommunications-carriers, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.5 million to PERATON INC.. 200612!067149!1700!N00039!SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS !FA877104D0003 !A!N! !Y!NS02 ! !20060918!20070918!602938771!602938771!602938771!N!MULTIMAX INC !13665 DULLES TECHNOLOGY DR!HERNDON !VA!20171!45825!033!24!LARGO !PRINCE GEORGE S !MARYLAND !+000001565833!N!N!000000000000!D307!AUTOMATED INFO SYSTEM DESIGN & INTEGRATION SVCS !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541519!A!A!5!B!M! !E!B!200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PERATON INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-18. End: 2011-06-24.

What specific automated information systems are being designed and integrated under this contract, and how do they align with current defense modernization priorities?

The contract focuses on the design and integration of automated information systems crucial for naval warfare operations. These systems likely support command and control, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance functions. Alignment with modernization priorities would depend on the specific technological advancements and capabilities these integrated systems are intended to provide, such as enhanced data processing, secure communication, or improved situational awareness for naval forces.

Given the 'Exclusion of Sources' clause, what was the justification for limiting the competitive pool, and how was fair market price ensured?

The justification for excluding sources typically relates to factors like proprietary technology, urgent need, or specific capabilities only a limited number of vendors possess. Ensuring fair market price in such scenarios often involves detailed cost analyses, comparison with similar contracts, and negotiation based on established cost principles. The contracting officer must document the rationale and demonstrate that the price is fair and reasonable.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is Multimax Inc.'s performance being measured to ensure effective delivery of services?

Key performance indicators for this contract would likely include system uptime, successful integration of components, adherence to security protocols, timely delivery of milestones, and overall system performance metrics relevant to naval warfare operations. Performance is typically measured through regular progress reports, site visits, user feedback, and adherence to contractually defined quality standards, with potential for award fees or penalties based on achievement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationWired and Wireless Telecommunications (except Satellite)Wired Telecommunications Carriers

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: L3harris Technologies, Inc (UEI: 004203337)

Address: 21000 ATLANTIC BLVD STE 300, DULLES, VA, 10

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA877104D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-09-18

Current End Date: 2011-06-24

Potential End Date: 2011-06-24 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2013-11-25

More Contracts from Peraton Inc.

View all Peraton Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending