National Archives Awards $23M for Building Construction to Lee Kennedy Co., Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,098,084 ($23.1M)

Contractor: LEE Kennedy CO., Inc.

Awarding Agency: National Archives and Records Administration

Start Date: 2009-10-28

End Date: 2018-09-28

Contract Duration: 3,257 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: NLJFK ADDITION GC

Place of Performance

Location: DORCHESTER, SUFFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02125

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

National Archives and Records Administration obligated $23.1 million to LEE KENNEDY CO., INC. for work described as: NLJFK ADDITION GC Key points: 1. Spending over $23 million on building construction. 2. Contract awarded to Lee Kennedy Co., Inc. 3. Full and open competition was utilized. 4. Sector: Construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $23,098,084.03 for construction services appears to be within a reasonable range for a project of this duration and scope, though specific benchmarks are unavailable without more detailed project specifications.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing by allowing all eligible vendors to submit bids.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value.

Public Impact

Supports federal infrastructure development and maintenance. Provides employment opportunities within the construction sector. Ensures the preservation and accessibility of national archives through facility improvements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 70 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The construction sector is a significant area of federal spending, encompassing a wide range of projects from infrastructure to facility maintenance. Benchmarks vary widely based on project type and location.

Small Business Impact

While this contract was awarded to a single firm, federal construction projects often involve numerous subcontracts, which can provide opportunities for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The use of full and open competition suggests a degree of oversight in the procurement process. However, the long duration of the contract warrants monitoring for adherence to scope and budget.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, national-archives-and-records-administra, ma, purchase-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

National Archives and Records Administration awarded $23.1 million to LEE KENNEDY CO., INC.. NLJFK ADDITION GC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEE KENNEDY CO., INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: National Archives and Records Administration (National Archives and Records Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-10-28. End: 2018-09-28.

What specific construction services were rendered under this contract, and how do they align with the National Archives' mission?

The contract, awarded under NAICS code 236220 (Commercial and Institutional Building Construction), likely encompassed a range of services such as new construction, renovation, or repair of facilities managed by the National Archives and Records Administration. These services would directly support the agency's mission by ensuring the physical integrity, security, and accessibility of historical records and public spaces.

Given the contract's duration and value, what were the primary risk factors considered during its award and management?

Key risks likely included potential cost overruns due to the extended timeline, unforeseen site conditions, changes in material costs, and the contractor's ability to maintain performance standards over nearly a decade. Effective risk management would have involved robust contract oversight, clear change order procedures, and regular performance reviews to mitigate these potential issues.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for taxpayer dollars in this construction project?

The full and open competition process is designed to maximize value by encouraging multiple bids and fostering a competitive environment. While this method generally leads to favorable pricing, the ultimate effectiveness depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria used, and the actual cost savings realized compared to alternative procurement methods or market rates for similar projects.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 122 QUINCY SHORE DR STE 1, QUINCY, MA, 02171

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,098,084

Exercised Options: $23,098,084

Current Obligation: $23,098,084

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-10-28

Current End Date: 2018-09-28

Potential End Date: 2018-09-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-09-11

Other National Archives and Records Administration Contracts

View all National Archives and Records Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending