DoD Awards $15M for JIATF-S C2F NASKW Florida Design Package to Merrick-RS & H Joint Venture
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,011,181 ($15.0M)
Contractor: Merrick-Rs & H Joint Venture LLP
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-04-19
End Date: 2027-03-31
Contract Duration: 1,442 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 23E-FINALIZE DBB DESIGN PACKAGE FOR JIATF-S C2F NASKW FLORIDA
Place of Performance
Location: KEY WEST, MONROE County, FLORIDA, 33040
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $15.0 million to MERRICK-RS & H JOINT VENTURE LLP for work described as: 23E-FINALIZE DBB DESIGN PACKAGE FOR JIATF-S C2F NASKW FLORIDA Key points: 1. Contract awarded for critical facility design services. 2. Competition method was full and open, suggesting market availability. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs. 4. Project duration is substantial, indicating complexity. 5. No small business participation noted.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The award amount of $15,011,181 for a design package appears reasonable given the contract duration and the nature of engineering services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facility design contracts would provide further context.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple capable firms could bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: The firm fixed price contract type helps ensure cost certainty for taxpayers, as the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns.
Public Impact
Enhances operational capabilities for the Joint Interagency Task Force South. Supports critical infrastructure development at Naval Support Activity, Key West. Potential for follow-on construction contracts, impacting future spending. Ensures compliance with engineering and design standards.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation.
- Long contract duration could introduce scope creep risks.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract.
- Full and Open Competition.
- Awarded to a Joint Venture, potentially leveraging specialized expertise.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically for facility design. Spending in this area is often tied to military readiness and infrastructure modernization efforts. Benchmarks for similar design packages vary widely based on project scope and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates no small business participation. This could be due to the specialized nature of the work or the size of the contract, which may favor larger firms or joint ventures.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Navy, under the Department of Defense, is responsible for oversight. The firm fixed price contract and full and open competition provide some level of accountability and price discovery.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- No small business participation.
- Long contract duration.
- Potential for cost escalation if design is not well-defined.
- Dependency on subsequent construction funding.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, fl, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $15.0 million to MERRICK-RS & H JOINT VENTURE LLP. 23E-FINALIZE DBB DESIGN PACKAGE FOR JIATF-S C2F NASKW FLORIDA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MERRICK-RS & H JOINT VENTURE LLP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-04-19. End: 2027-03-31.
What is the estimated total project cost, including potential construction, and how does this design package cost compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities?
The provided data only details the design package award. To assess the full project cost, information on subsequent construction phases and their associated budgets would be required. Benchmarking the $15M design cost against similar large-scale military facility designs would necessitate access to detailed project specifications and market data for comparable contracts.
What are the specific risks associated with the long duration (1442 days) of this design contract, and how are they being mitigated?
A long design contract duration can increase risks such as inflation impacting future construction costs, potential obsolescence of design elements, and contractor performance degradation over time. Mitigation strategies may include phased delivery schedules, clear performance metrics, and robust contract management by the Navy to ensure timely progress and adherence to specifications.
How effectively does the firm fixed price contract ensure value for money, considering the extended timeline and potential for unforeseen design challenges?
The firm fixed price contract aims to ensure value by shifting cost overrun risk to the contractor. However, for long-duration design projects with potential for unforeseen challenges, the initial price might not fully reflect the final effort. Effective value is realized if the contractor successfully delivers the required design within the agreed price, and if the design itself is efficient and cost-effective for subsequent construction.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5970 GREENWOOD PLAZA BLVD, GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO, 80111
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,011,181
Exercised Options: $15,011,181
Current Obligation: $15,011,181
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6945021D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-04-19
Current End Date: 2027-03-31
Potential End Date: 2027-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-18
More Contracts from Merrick-Rs & H Joint Venture LLP
- Post Construction Award Services (pcas) for the P103 - Engineering Test Facility — $6.8M (Department of Defense)
View all Merrick-Rs & H Joint Venture LLP federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)