Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay Operations Contract Awarded to Amentum Technology for $37.8M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $37,777,271 ($37.8M)

Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-12-01

End Date: 2021-09-30

Contract Duration: 303 days

Daily Burn Rate: $124.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT (BOS) I SERVICES AT NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE (NSB) KINGS BAY, GA AND OUTLYING AREAS - TASK ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE BASE PERIOD RECURRING WORK.

Place of Performance

Location: KINGS BAY, CAMDEN County, GEORGIA, 31547

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $37.8 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT (BOS) I SERVICES AT NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE (NSB) KINGS BAY, GA AND OUTLYING AREAS - TASK ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE BASE PERIOD RECURRING WORK. Key points: 1. The contract focuses on essential base operations and facilities support, indicating a critical need for consistent service delivery. 2. Amentum Technology, Inc. secured this award, suggesting a competitive landscape for base support services within the Department of Defense. 3. The contract's duration of 303 days points to a defined scope of work for the base period. 4. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to provide cost certainty for the government. 5. The absence of small business set-asides suggests the primary competition was among larger, established service providers. 6. This award falls under facilities support services, a common and vital category for maintaining military installations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $37.8 million for a 303-day period represents a significant investment in base operations. Benchmarking against similar base operating support contracts is challenging without more granular data on the specific services included. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests an effort to control costs. The award amount appears reasonable for comprehensive facilities support at a major naval installation.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The use of full and open competition is standard for significant service contracts.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages a wider range of potential contractors to bid, driving down prices and improving the quality of services received.

Public Impact

Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay personnel and operations benefit from the continuity of essential support services. Services include facilities maintenance, logistics, and potentially other base operational functions critical to the base's mission. The primary geographic impact is localized to Kings Bay, Georgia, and surrounding areas supporting the base. The contract supports a workforce involved in facilities management and related support roles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, particularly within the Department of Defense, which relies heavily on contractors to manage its vast infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other Base Operations Support (BOS) contracts across different military branches and installations.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have explicit subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned. This suggests that the primary competition was likely among larger prime contractors. While not a direct set-aside, the prime contractor may still engage small businesses for specific services, but the overall impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular award is not explicitly detailed.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are embedded within the firm-fixed-price contract terms, performance standards, and payment schedules. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance metrics and oversight activities may not be publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, naval-submarine-base-kings-bay, amentum-technology-inc, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, base-operations-support, georgia, service-contract, large-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $37.8 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT (BOS) I SERVICES AT NAVAL SUBMARINE BASE (NSB) KINGS BAY, GA AND OUTLYING AREAS - TASK ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE BASE PERIOD RECURRING WORK.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $37.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-12-01. End: 2021-09-30.

What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with similar Base Operations Support (BOS) contracts?

Amentum Technology, Inc. has a significant history of performing Base Operations Support (BOS) and facilities services for the U.S. military. They have held numerous contracts across various branches, including the Army, Navy, and Air Force, often involving comprehensive facility maintenance, logistics, and operational support. Their experience typically includes managing large-scale contracts with complex requirements, similar to the services needed at Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay. Reviewing their past performance on similar contracts, including any reported issues or successes, would provide further insight into their capability to execute this specific task order effectively. Data on contract awards and performance evaluations from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) would be crucial for a detailed assessment.

How does the $37.8 million award for 303 days compare to similar BOS contracts?

The award of approximately $37.8 million for a 303-day base period for Base Operations Support (BOS) at Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay translates to a daily rate of roughly $124,677. Comparing this to similar BOS contracts requires careful consideration of the scope of services, geographic location, and specific installation needs. BOS contracts can vary widely in cost due to differences in facility size, complexity, personnel requirements, and the specific services included (e.g., housing, transportation, fire protection, utilities). While this daily rate appears substantial, it is not uncommon for comprehensive BOS contracts at major military installations. A more precise comparison would involve analyzing contracts with similar service inclusions and durations awarded to other large military bases.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract for the government?

The primary risks for the government associated with this contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., which could disrupt essential base operations. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, there's a risk of contractor underperformance if they prioritize cost savings over quality, potentially leading to increased long-term maintenance costs or safety issues. Another risk is contractor default or financial instability, although less likely with established firms. Scope creep, where the government requests additional services not covered by the original contract, could lead to cost increases if not managed properly through contract modifications. Finally, over-reliance on a single contractor for critical functions can create vulnerabilities if the contractor fails to meet obligations.

How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money in this context?

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for the government when the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly. For base operations support, where many services are recurring and predictable, FFP provides cost certainty and incentivizes the contractor to control costs efficiently. The contractor assumes most of the risk for cost overruns, which can lead to more competitive bidding. However, if the scope is not precisely defined or if unforeseen circumstances arise, an FFP contract might limit the government's flexibility to adapt, potentially leading to less-than-optimal outcomes if the contractor rigidly adheres to a poorly defined scope. In this case, for recurring base operations, FFP is likely a suitable choice for cost control.

What is the historical spending trend for Base Operations Support at NSB Kings Bay?

Analyzing the historical spending trend for Base Operations Support (BOS) at Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay (NSB KB) requires access to historical contract data. This specific award covers the base period from December 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021. To understand trends, one would need to examine previous BOS contracts awarded to NSB KB, including their values, durations, and the contractors involved. This would reveal whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing over time, and if there have been shifts in contracting strategies (e.g., from multiple smaller contracts to larger consolidated ones). Without access to that historical data, it's impossible to provide specific spending trends for NSB KB's BOS requirements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N6945019R1900

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc

Address: 604 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD., TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $37,802,810

Exercised Options: $37,802,810

Current Obligation: $37,777,271

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6945020D0045

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-12-01

Current End Date: 2021-09-30

Potential End Date: 2021-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2022-09-27

More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.

View all Amentum Technology, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending