DoD's $18.8M Hurricane Sally Recovery Engineering Contract Awarded to Schmidt-Prime Group, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,821,095 ($18.8M)
Contractor: Schmidt-Prime Group, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2020-09-29
End Date: 2028-03-31
Contract Duration: 2,740 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 20E - DB RFP DEVELOPMENT - HURRICANE SALLY RECOVERY
Place of Performance
Location: PENSACOLA, ESCAMBIA County, FLORIDA, 32501
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $18.8 million to SCHMIDT-PRIME GROUP, LLC for work described as: 20E - DB RFP DEVELOPMENT - HURRICANE SALLY RECOVERY Key points: 1. Contract awarded for critical hurricane recovery engineering services, indicating a significant need for specialized expertise. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests a clear scope and predictable costs for the government. 3. A long performance period of nearly 5.5 years allows for comprehensive project execution and potential follow-on work. 4. The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, implying a robust bidding process. 5. The engineering services NAICS code (541330) points to a specialized market with established players. 6. The contract's value is substantial, reflecting the scale and complexity of hurricane recovery efforts. 7. The award to a single contractor, Schmidt-Prime Group, LLC, suggests they were the best value offeror. 8. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, indicating the scale of services required.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $18.8 million for engineering services related to hurricane recovery appears reasonable given the extensive performance period and the specialized nature of the work. Benchmarking against similar large-scale disaster recovery engineering contracts would provide further insight, but the firm-fixed-price structure suggests cost control. The award to Schmidt-Prime Group, LLC, implies they offered competitive pricing and technical capabilities.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the initial solicitation might have had some exclusions, the final award was made after a competitive process where all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific details of the exclusion are not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a broad competition was ultimately pursued.
Taxpayer Impact: This competitive approach is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions, driving down costs and improving service quality.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are residents and infrastructure in areas impacted by Hurricane Sally, particularly in Florida. The services delivered will focus on engineering assessments, planning, and potentially design for recovery and rebuilding efforts. The geographic impact is concentrated in Florida, specifically areas affected by Hurricane Sally. The contract supports the federal government's role in disaster response and recovery, ensuring essential services are restored. The contract may indirectly support the local workforce through the prime contractor and any subcontractors involved in the engineering services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep given the long performance period and the nature of disaster recovery.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical recovery engineering services could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
- The specific reasons for 'exclusion of sources' in the initial stages of competition are not detailed, warranting further review.
- The long duration could lead to potential challenges in adapting to evolving recovery needs or technological advancements.
Positive Signals
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- The extensive performance period allows for thorough execution of complex recovery tasks.
- Awarding under full and open competition generally leads to better value and quality.
- The contract addresses a critical need for post-disaster engineering support.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically related to disaster recovery. The market for engineering services is diverse, encompassing firms that specialize in civil, structural, environmental, and other engineering disciplines. Large-scale disaster recovery projects often require a combination of these expertise areas. Federal spending in this sector is cyclical, often spiking after major natural disasters. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific type and scale of engineering services required for recovery.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, as indicated by 'ss: false' and 'sb: false'. The substantial value and the nature of specialized engineering services for disaster recovery likely favored larger, established firms with the capacity and expertise to handle such a significant undertaking. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses, though it is common practice for prime contractors to engage small businesses for specific tasks.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Navy contracting officers and program managers. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected during the contract's performance.
Related Government Programs
- Hurricane Recovery Programs
- Engineering and Technical Services
- Disaster Response Contracts
- Department of Defense Procurement
- Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Support
Risk Flags
- Long performance period may lead to evolving requirements.
- Potential for cost increases over the contract duration.
- Need for sustained government oversight.
- Specificity of 'exclusion of sources' not detailed.
Tags
engineering-services, disaster-recovery, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, florida, hurricane-sally, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $18.8 million to SCHMIDT-PRIME GROUP, LLC. 20E - DB RFP DEVELOPMENT - HURRICANE SALLY RECOVERY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SCHMIDT-PRIME GROUP, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-09-29. End: 2028-03-31.
What is the specific nature of the engineering services required for Hurricane Sally recovery under this contract?
The contract specifies 'DB RFP DEVELOPMENT - HURRICANE SALLY RECOVERY' and falls under the NAICS code for Engineering Services (541330). This suggests the services likely involve technical assessments, planning, design, and potentially project management related to the repair, restoration, and rebuilding of infrastructure and facilities damaged by Hurricane Sally. The 'RFP Development' aspect indicates a focus on preparing requirements and solicitations for subsequent recovery actions, which could include detailed site surveys, damage assessments, cost estimations, and the development of technical specifications for construction or repair contracts.
How does the $18.8 million contract value compare to similar disaster recovery engineering contracts awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies?
Comparing the $18.8 million value requires context on the scale of Hurricane Sally's impact and the specific services procured. Large-scale disaster recovery efforts, especially those involving significant infrastructure damage, can command multi-million dollar engineering contracts. For instance, contracts for major hurricane responses like Katrina or Maria often involved hundreds of millions in engineering and construction services. This $18.8 million award appears to be for a specific phase or set of services within the broader recovery effort, potentially focused on planning and procurement preparation rather than direct construction oversight. Benchmarking against contracts for similar-sized events or specific engineering tasks (e.g., structural assessments, environmental remediation planning) would provide a more precise comparison.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate Schmidt-Prime Group, LLC's performance on this contract?
Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are not detailed in the provided data. However, for an engineering services contract focused on RFP development for disaster recovery, typical performance metrics would likely include timeliness of deliverables (e.g., submission of RFPs by deadlines), quality of technical documentation (accuracy of assessments, clarity of specifications), adherence to budget (if applicable to specific task orders), and compliance with all contractual requirements and federal regulations. The government would monitor the contractor's ability to produce comprehensive and actionable documentation that facilitates efficient and effective subsequent procurement actions for the actual recovery work.
What is the historical spending pattern for engineering services related to disaster recovery by the Department of the Navy?
Historical spending patterns for disaster recovery engineering services by the Department of the Navy are highly event-driven and can fluctuate significantly year to year. Major hurricanes, floods, or other natural disasters necessitate rapid procurement of specialized engineering expertise for assessment, planning, and recovery. While the Navy maintains standing contracts and capabilities for base maintenance and repair, large-scale disaster response contracts are often awarded on an as-needed basis. Analyzing past spending would require examining contract awards following significant weather events impacting Navy installations or areas under its purview, looking at both direct procurements and support roles in broader federal recovery efforts.
What are the potential risks associated with a long contract duration (nearly 5.5 years) for disaster recovery engineering services?
A long contract duration of nearly 5.5 years for disaster recovery engineering services presents several potential risks. Firstly, the needs and priorities of the recovery effort may evolve over time, and a fixed contract scope might not adapt efficiently. Secondly, the cost of services could increase due to inflation or changes in market rates, potentially impacting the overall value if not managed carefully. Thirdly, maintaining consistent oversight and ensuring the contractor remains engaged and effective over such an extended period can be challenging. Lastly, there's a risk that the initial technical solutions or approaches may become outdated if the project timeline is significantly protracted, requiring potential modifications or re-work.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 901 W GARDEN ST, PENSACOLA, FL, 32502
Business Categories: Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $18,821,095
Exercised Options: $18,821,095
Current Obligation: $18,821,095
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6945020D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-09-29
Current End Date: 2028-03-31
Potential End Date: 2028-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-16
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)