Airfield repairs at NAS Corpus Christi awarded to HEAD INC/BALLEW for over $25.8 million
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $25,817,613 ($25.8M)
Contractor: Head Inc/Ballew, a Joint Venture
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-03-30
End Date: 2019-02-18
Contract Duration: 1,055 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF CON; DBB; AIRFIELD REPAIRS, NAS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
Place of Performance
Location: CORPUS CHRISTI, NUECES County, TEXAS, 78419
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $25.8 million to HEAD INC/BALLEW, A JOINT VENTURE for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF CON; DBB; AIRFIELD REPAIRS, NAS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the scope of airfield repairs. 2. Full and open competition suggests potential for competitive pricing. 3. Contract duration of nearly three years indicates a substantial project. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor. 5. Project falls under highway, street, and bridge construction NAICS code. 6. Awarded by the Department of the Navy, indicating defense sector focus.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $25.8 million for airfield repairs at NAS Corpus Christi seems aligned with the scale of such infrastructure projects. Benchmarking against similar airfield repair contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor bears the primary financial risk, which can incentivize cost control. However, without detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to industry standards for specific repair elements (e.g., pavement resurfacing, lighting systems), a definitive value assessment is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this project. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, three offers generally provide a reasonable basis for price discovery and selection. The agency's decision to use full and open competition is a positive indicator for achieving a fair market price.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to bid, potentially leading to lower prices and better value for the government's investment.
Public Impact
Naval Air Station Corpus Christi benefits from improved airfield infrastructure, enhancing operational capabilities. The project supports critical military aviation operations and readiness. Geographic impact is localized to Corpus Christi, Texas. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction labor in the region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during repairs, despite fixed-price contract.
- Contract duration could be impacted by weather delays or supply chain disruptions.
- Quality of repairs needs to be monitored to ensure long-term durability and safety.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process.
- Awarded by a major defense agency (Department of the Navy) indicating adherence to procurement standards.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically focusing on airfield infrastructure. The market for airfield construction and repair is significant, driven by both military and civilian aviation needs. Projects like this are crucial for maintaining the operational readiness and safety of air bases. Comparable spending benchmarks for airfield repairs can vary widely based on the specific scope of work, location, and complexity of the airfield.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded under full and open competition and there is no indication of a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, HEAD INC/BALLEW, is a joint venture, which may involve small businesses. However, without specific subcontracting plans or data, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were utilized as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract is subject to standard Department of Defense oversight mechanisms. As a firm fixed-price contract, oversight would likely focus on ensuring the work is completed according to specifications and on schedule. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Military Base Infrastructure Projects
- Airfield Pavement and Repair Contracts
- Department of Defense Construction Contracts
- Naval Facilities Engineering Command Projects
Risk Flags
- Contract Duration
- Potential for Unforeseen Conditions
- Quality Assurance Requirements
Tags
construction, defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, airfield-repairs, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, texas, large-contract, infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $25.8 million to HEAD INC/BALLEW, A JOINT VENTURE. IGF::OT::IGF CON; DBB; AIRFIELD REPAIRS, NAS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HEAD INC/BALLEW, A JOINT VENTURE.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $25.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-03-30. End: 2019-02-18.
What is the track record of HEAD INC/BALLEW on similar federal contracts?
Information regarding the specific track record of the joint venture HEAD INC/BALLEW on similar federal contracts is not directly available in the provided data. A comprehensive review would require accessing contract databases to examine past performance, past performance evaluations, and any history of disputes or contract terminations. Understanding their experience with airfield repairs and large-scale construction projects would be crucial for assessing their capability to successfully execute this contract. Without this data, it's difficult to gauge their reliability and past success in delivering similar projects on time and within budget.
How does the awarded price compare to the original estimated cost or budget?
The provided data does not include the original estimated cost or budget for this contract. Therefore, a direct comparison to assess if the awarded price was above, below, or in line with expectations is not possible. Typically, agencies establish an independent government cost estimate (IGCE) before soliciting bids. Analyzing the relationship between the IGCE and the final awarded price can offer insights into the effectiveness of the competition and the negotiation process. A significant difference could indicate issues with the initial estimate or the bidding environment.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract and how was performance measured?
Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this airfield repair contract are not detailed in the provided summary data. Generally, for construction contracts of this nature, KPIs would likely include adherence to schedule, quality of workmanship, safety compliance, and completion of specified repair tasks (e.g., pavement integrity, lighting functionality). Performance measurement would typically involve regular site inspections by government representatives, progress reports from the contractor, and potentially milestone-based reviews. The firm fixed-price nature implies that meeting the defined scope and quality standards within the agreed price is paramount.
What is the historical spending trend for airfield repairs at NAS Corpus Christi?
Historical spending trends for airfield repairs specifically at NAS Corpus Christi are not available within the provided data. To establish such a trend, one would need to analyze contract awards for similar services at this specific installation over several fiscal years. This would involve searching federal procurement databases for contracts related to airfield maintenance, repair, and construction at NAS Corpus Christi. Understanding past spending patterns can help contextualize the current contract's value and identify any significant fluctuations or recurring needs for infrastructure upgrades.
What is the potential impact of this contract on the local economy in Corpus Christi, Texas?
This contract, valued at over $25.8 million for airfield repairs, is likely to have a positive impact on the local economy in Corpus Christi, Texas. The project will create jobs for construction workers, engineers, and support staff. Additionally, the prime contractor and any subcontractors may procure materials and services from local suppliers, further stimulating economic activity. The duration of the contract (nearly three years) suggests a sustained period of employment and business opportunities. The presence of a joint venture as the prime contractor might also indicate a structure that could involve local small businesses as partners or subcontractors.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N6945016R0608
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4477 E 5TH AVE, COLUMBUS, OH, 43219
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $25,817,613
Exercised Options: $25,817,613
Current Obligation: $25,817,613
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-03-30
Current End Date: 2019-02-18
Potential End Date: 2019-02-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-07-30
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)