DoD Awards $2.15M for EAPS XL Vault & Imaging Upgrade to Marietta Nondestructive Testing LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,147,916 ($2.1M)
Contractor: Marietta Nondestructive Testing LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-09-18
End Date: 2026-08-31
Contract Duration: 712 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.0K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NEW EAPS XL VAULT AND IMAGING UPGRADE
Place of Performance
Location: CHERRY POINT, CRAVEN County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28533
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $2.1 million to MARIETTA NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING LLC for work described as: NEW EAPS XL VAULT AND IMAGING UPGRADE Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single vendor, raising questions about competition. 2. The $2.15M value for laboratory instrument manufacturing appears high for the scope. 3. Limited competition could lead to suboptimal pricing and taxpayer inefficiency. 4. The sector is analytical laboratory instrument manufacturing, a niche area.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $2.15M for an "EAPS XL Vault and Imaging Upgrade" seems high for analytical laboratory instrument manufacturing. Benchmarking against similar specialized equipment upgrades is difficult without more detail, but the price warrants scrutiny.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a potential limitation in the competitive process. This lack of broad competition may have prevented the government from obtaining the best possible price.
Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition raises concerns about potential overspending, impacting taxpayer value. Without a competitive bidding process, it's difficult to ascertain if the price reflects fair market value.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying due to a lack of competitive bidding. The upgrade's necessity and scope should be clearly justified to ensure efficient use of funds. Future procurements in this niche sector should explore broader competition to drive down costs.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potentially high price
- Limited transparency on scope
Positive Signals
- Specific upgrade for critical equipment
- Firm fixed price contract limits cost overrun risk
Sector Analysis
The contract falls within the Analytical Laboratory Instrument Manufacturing sector. Spending in this area can vary widely based on technological complexity and specialization. Benchmarks are difficult without specific equipment details, but significant investments often require robust justification.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to Marietta Nondestructive Testing LLC, and there is no indication that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business set-asides were considered.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was made via a Purchase Order under the Department of the Navy. Oversight should focus on ensuring the necessity of the upgrade, the justification for limited competition, and the final delivery and performance of the contracted services.
Related Government Programs
- Analytical Laboratory Instrument Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Potential for inflated pricing
- Limited transparency on technical scope
- No clear small business participation noted
Tags
analytical-laboratory-instrument-manufac, department-of-defense, nc, purchase-order, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $2.1 million to MARIETTA NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING LLC. NEW EAPS XL VAULT AND IMAGING UPGRADE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MARIETTA NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-09-18. End: 2026-08-31.
What specific capabilities does the EAPS XL Vault and Imaging Upgrade provide, and how do these directly enhance the Department of the Navy's operational effectiveness to justify the $2.15M cost?
The EAPS XL Vault and Imaging Upgrade likely pertains to enhancing the security and diagnostic capabilities of a specific system, possibly related to environmental or analytical processes. Without detailed specifications, it's challenging to quantify the direct operational enhancements. However, such upgrades are typically justified by improved data accuracy, faster analysis, enhanced safety, or extended equipment lifespan, all contributing to mission readiness and efficiency.
Given the 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' status, what was the specific justification for limiting competition, and were alternative competitive strategies explored to ensure the best value for taxpayers?
The justification for not competing under SAP typically involves factors like urgency, unique capabilities of a single source, or specific technical requirements that only one vendor can meet. The government should have documented this justification thoroughly. Exploring alternative competitive strategies, such as requesting quotes from multiple pre-qualified vendors or considering a broader solicitation if feasible, is crucial to ensure fair pricing and taxpayer value.
How does the $2.15M contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar analytical laboratory instrument upgrades, and what is the potential risk of overpayment due to the limited competition?
Benchmarking this specific upgrade is difficult without detailed technical specifications. However, $2.15M for what appears to be a specialized vault and imaging system upgrade within analytical instruments seems substantial. The risk of overpayment is elevated due to the limited competition; without a competitive environment, the awarded price may not reflect the lowest achievable cost, potentially leading to inefficient use of taxpayer funds.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments Manufacturing › Analytical Laboratory Instrument Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: INSTRUMENTS AND LABORATORY EQPT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Solicitation ID: N6852024Q0015
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 530 COMMERCE PARK DR SE, MARIETTA, GA, 30060
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,147,916
Exercised Options: $2,147,916
Current Obligation: $2,147,916
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-09-18
Current End Date: 2026-08-31
Potential End Date: 2026-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-13
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)