Naval Air Station Contract for Physical Properties Testing Equipment Awarded to Honeywell International Inc. for $16.55M
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,551,015 ($16.6M)
Contractor: Honeywell International Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-11-23
End Date: 2013-10-31
Contract Duration: 2,899 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200602!118445!1700!N68335!NAVAL AIR ENGINEERING STATION !N6833506C0056 !A!N! !N! ! !20051123!20070430!001393073!001393073!139691877!N!HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC !699 ROUTE 46 EAST, ROUTE 4!TETERBORO !NJ!07608!72480!003!34!TETERBORO !BERGEN !NEW JERSEY!+000012212651!N!N!000022297334!6635!PHYSICAL PROPERTIES TESTING EQUIPMENT !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !334519!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !D!U!J!1!001!N!1G!A!Y!A! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y!1719!N68335!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: CLEARWATER, PINELLAS County, FLORIDA, 33764
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.6 million to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. for work described as: 200602!118445!1700!N68335!NAVAL AIR ENGINEERING STATION !N6833506C0056 !A!N! !N! ! !20051123!20070430!001393073!001393073!139691877!N!HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC !699 ROUTE 46 EAST, ROUTE 4!TETERBORO !NJ!07608!72480!003!34!TETERBORO !BERG… Key points: 1. The contract value of $16.55M for physical properties testing equipment is significant. 2. Honeywell International Inc. is a major defense contractor, indicating potential market concentration. 3. The 'NOT COMPETED' award type presents a risk of inflated pricing and limited innovation. 4. The sector is 'Other Measuring and Controlling Device Manufacturing', which is a niche but critical area for defense operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $16.55M for physical properties testing equipment appears high without competitive bidding. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized testing equipment is difficult due to the 'NOT COMPETED' status.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was awarded using a sole-source (NOT COMPETED) method. This significantly limits price discovery and may lead to a higher price than if multiple vendors had competed.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition raises concerns about taxpayer value, as the government may have paid a premium for this equipment.
Public Impact
Potential for overpayment due to lack of competition. Limited visibility into the specific capabilities and technological advancements of the testing equipment. Impact on readiness if the equipment is critical and the price paid was excessive.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 57 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for overpricing
Positive Signals
- Award to established contractor
- Specific equipment for naval air engineering
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under 'Other Measuring and Controlling Device Manufacturing'. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on technological advancements and defense needs. Without competitive data, it's hard to benchmark this specific award.
Small Business Impact
The award to Honeywell International Inc., a large corporation, suggests that small businesses were likely not involved in this specific procurement, potentially missing opportunities for set-asides.
Oversight & Accountability
The sole-source nature of this award warrants closer oversight to ensure the price paid was fair and reasonable, and that the equipment meets all necessary specifications.
Related Government Programs
- Other Measuring and Controlling Device Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks transparency.
- Potential for inflated pricing.
- Limited opportunity for innovation.
- No clear indication of small business participation.
- High contract value without competitive justification.
Tags
other-measuring-and-controlling-device-m, department-of-defense, fl, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.6 million to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.. 200602!118445!1700!N68335!NAVAL AIR ENGINEERING STATION !N6833506C0056 !A!N! !N! ! !20051123!20070430!001393073!001393073!139691877!N!HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC !699 ROUTE 46 EAST, ROUTE 4!TETERBORO !NJ!07608!72480!003!34!TETERBORO !BERGEN !NEW JERSEY!+000012212651!N!N!000022297334!6635!PHYSICAL PROPERTIES TESTING EQUIPMENT !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !334519!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-11-23. End: 2013-10-31.
What was the justification for the sole-source award, and was a market research conducted to confirm no other sources could provide the required equipment?
The justification for a sole-source award is crucial for understanding why competition was bypassed. A thorough market research report should have been conducted to identify potential sources and determine if any could meet the specialized requirements. Without this information, it's difficult to assess if the government truly exhausted all options for competitive procurement.
How does the $16.55M contract value compare to the estimated market price for similar physical properties testing equipment, considering the lack of competitive bids?
Without competitive bids, directly comparing the $16.55M contract value to a market price is challenging. However, an independent government estimate or a review of historical pricing for comparable, competitively procured systems could provide a benchmark. The absence of competition inherently introduces a risk of the price being higher than a market-driven rate.
What are the specific performance metrics and expected lifespan of the physical properties testing equipment procured under this contract, and how will their effectiveness be measured?
Understanding the specific performance metrics and expected lifespan is vital for assessing the long-term value of this equipment. Effectiveness should be measured against operational requirements and any established standards for physical properties testing. Post-delivery inspections and performance monitoring are key to ensuring the equipment fulfills its intended purpose.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments Manufacturing › Other Measuring and Controlling Device Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: INSTRUMENTS AND LABORATORY EQPT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Honeywell International Inc (UEI: 139691877)
Address: 699 ROUTE 46 EAST, ROUTE 4, TETERBORO, NJ, 09
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-11-23
Current End Date: 2013-10-31
Potential End Date: 2013-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-10-22
More Contracts from Honeywell International Inc.
- Federal Contract — $1.8B (Department of Defense)
- Tiger II Services and Hardware UCA — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- Aircraft Engines/Engine Parts — $934.2M (Department of Defense)
- Non-Personal Services - Secondary Power Logistics Solution (spls) — $798.7M (Department of Defense)
- 200607!000110!5700!fa8626!asc/Lpk !FA862606C2065 !A!N! !N! ! !20060425!20070122!195908637!195908637!139691877!n!honeywell Intl !13350 US Highway 19 North !clearwater !fl!33764!12875!103!12!clearwater !pinellas !florida !+000000398530!n!n!000121531465!5895!miscellaneous Communication Equipment !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !NOT Discernable !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !c!n!j!1!001!n!1a!a!y!a! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $451.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)