DoD Awards $79M for Underwater Sound Equipment to Harris Acoustic Products Corp
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,391,893 ($14.4M)
Contractor: Harris Acoustic Products Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 1999-12-06
End Date: 2011-09-01
Contract Duration: 4,287 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200006!1700!000977!BW24A !NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER, N!N6660400C0977 !A!*!* !19991206!20001001!791678337!791678337!791678337!N!02131!HARRIS ACOUSTIC PRODUCTS CORP.!141 WASHINGTON ST !EAST WALPOLE !MA!02032!20730!021!25!EAST WALPOLE !NORFOLK !MASS !0001!+000003431522!N!N!000000000000!5845!UNDERWATER SOUND EQUIPMENT !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !3669!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!J!2!004!B!* !A!N!A!* !* !N!B!N!C!*!A!A!A!A!* !*!N!A!B!N!*!*!*!*!*!
Place of Performance
Location: BRAINTREE, NORFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02184
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.4 million to HARRIS ACOUSTIC PRODUCTS CORPORATION for work described as: 200006!1700!000977!BW24A !NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER, N!N6660400C0977 !A!*!* !19991206!20001001!791678337!791678337!791678337!N!02131!HARRIS ACOUSTIC PRODUCTS CORP.!141 WASHINGTON ST !EAST WALPOLE !MA!02032!20730!021!25!EAST WALPOLE !NOR… Key points: 1. Significant contract value for specialized defense equipment. 2. Competition method indicates a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Risk associated with sole-source or limited competition awards needs monitoring. 4. Sector focus on Defense highlights critical national security spending.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $79,167,833.70 appears substantial for specialized underwater sound equipment. Benchmarking against similar contracts would be necessary for a definitive pricing assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally maximizes taxpayer value by encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best prices.
Public Impact
Supports naval operations and undersea warfare capabilities. Ensures availability of critical sound equipment for defense missions. Potential for technological advancements in acoustic systems. Impacts companies within the defense manufacturing supply chain.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope changes.
- Dependence on a single supplier for critical components.
- Long-term sustainment and maintenance costs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Clear definition of product/service (underwater sound equipment).
- Fixed-price contract type can limit cost uncertainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically related to naval warfare and specialized equipment. Spending in this area is driven by national security priorities and technological advancements in military capabilities.
Small Business Impact
Analysis of small business participation is not directly available from the provided data. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), indicating established oversight mechanisms. However, the duration and value warrant ongoing monitoring for performance and cost adherence.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for long-term sustainment costs.
- Dependence on specific supplier capabilities.
- Risk of technological obsolescence.
- Complexity of specialized equipment integration.
Tags
department-of-defense, ma, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.4 million to HARRIS ACOUSTIC PRODUCTS CORPORATION. 200006!1700!000977!BW24A !NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER, N!N6660400C0977 !A!*!* !19991206!20001001!791678337!791678337!791678337!N!02131!HARRIS ACOUSTIC PRODUCTS CORP.!141 WASHINGTON ST !EAST WALPOLE !MA!02032!20730!021!25!EAST WALPOLE !NORFOLK !MASS !0001!+000003431522!N!N!000000000000!5845!UNDERWATER SOUND EQUIPMENT !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !3669!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!J!
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HARRIS ACOUSTIC PRODUCTS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 1999-12-06. End: 2011-09-01.
What is the specific type and capability of the 'Underwater Sound Equipment' being procured, and how does it align with current naval requirements?
The data specifies 'UNDERWATER SOUND EQUIPMENT' under PSC 5845. This typically refers to sonar systems, hydrophones, acoustic projectors, and related components used for detection, communication, and navigation underwater. Its alignment with current naval requirements would depend on the specific technical specifications and operational needs outlined in the contract's Statement of Work, which are not detailed here.
Given the contract's duration and value, what are the primary risks associated with the performance and delivery of this specialized equipment?
Key risks include potential delays in manufacturing complex acoustic systems, integration challenges with existing naval platforms, and the possibility of technological obsolescence if the equipment's lifespan is shorter than anticipated. Ensuring consistent quality control for sensitive acoustic components is also critical to mitigate performance risks and ensure mission effectiveness.
How does the awarded price compare to industry benchmarks for similar underwater sound equipment, and what factors might justify any deviations?
Without specific technical details and market data, a direct price comparison is difficult. However, factors justifying deviations could include unique performance specifications, advanced technological features, stringent quality assurance requirements, or limited supplier availability for highly specialized components. A thorough cost analysis by the procuring agency would have assessed these factors.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 141 WASHINGTON ST, EAST WALPOLE, MA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 1999-12-06
Current End Date: 2011-09-01
Potential End Date: 2011-09-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-09-01
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)