DoD awards $3.5M for Andersen AFB design-build package, with Jacobs Government Services as prime

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,526,398 ($3.5M)

Contractor: Jacobs Government Services CO

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2019-05-13

End Date: 2026-10-31

Contract Duration: 2,728 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF X016 PREPARATION OF DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) PACKAGE CONSISTING OF FULL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, DETAILED COST ESTIMATE, AND OTHER SERVICES FOR FY21 MCAF P-3001 AJJY203001 APSI STANDOFF WEAPONS COMPLEX, MSA 2, ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, GUAM.

Place of Performance

Location: YIGO, GUAM County, GUAM, 96929

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $3.5 million to JACOBS GOVERNMENT SERVICES CO for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF X016 PREPARATION OF DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) PACKAGE CONSISTING OF FULL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, DETAILED COST ESTIMATE, AND OTHER SERVICES FOR FY21 MCAF P-3001 AJJY203001 APSI STANDOFF WEAPONS COMPLEX, MSA 2, ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, GUAM. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on preparing design-bid-build packages for critical infrastructure at Andersen AFB. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract aims to ensure cost certainty for the project. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a robust bidding process. 4. The contract duration extends over several fiscal years, indicating a phased approach. 5. This award falls under engineering services, a key support function for military installations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.5 million for preparing a design-bid-build package appears reasonable given the scope of work, which includes full plans, specifications, and detailed cost estimates for a significant military complex. Benchmarking against similar large-scale military infrastructure design contracts suggests that this pricing is competitive. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost predictability for the government, mitigating risk associated with cost overruns during the design phase.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a healthy level of market interest and engagement.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for obtaining the best value through a wide range of offers, leading to more efficient use of public funds.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the U.S. Air Force, ensuring the modernization and readiness of facilities at Andersen Air Force Base. The contract delivers essential engineering services for the preparation of construction documents for the Standoff Weapons Complex. The geographic impact is concentrated on Guam, supporting U.S. strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific region. This contract supports specialized engineering and construction management jobs within the engineering services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if initial design parameters are not clearly defined.
Reliance on a single prime contractor for a multi-year design package could pose risks if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
Long contract duration allows for phased development and potential for future construction phases.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry. The market for military infrastructure design and planning is substantial, driven by ongoing modernization efforts and strategic positioning of forces globally. Comparable spending benchmarks for large-scale military facility design projects often run into millions of dollars, depending on complexity and scale. This contract's value aligns with typical expenditures for comprehensive design packages for significant military installations.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. While the prime contractor, Jacobs Government Services Co., is a large entity, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors for specialized services within the design package, such as specific engineering disciplines or technical support. The extent of small business subcontracting will depend on the prime contractor's strategy and the specific requirements outlined in the contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and project management offices, responsible for ensuring adherence to design specifications, timelines, and budget. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified design documents. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases where award details are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction Program
Design and Engineering Services
Indo-Pacific Defense Infrastructure
Andersen Air Force Base Facilities Modernization

Risk Flags

Potential for design changes impacting cost and schedule.
Contractor performance risk for timely and quality delivery.
Dependency on accurate cost estimation for future construction funding.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $3.5 million to JACOBS GOVERNMENT SERVICES CO. IGF::OT::IGF X016 PREPARATION OF DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) PACKAGE CONSISTING OF FULL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, DETAILED COST ESTIMATE, AND OTHER SERVICES FOR FY21 MCAF P-3001 AJJY203001 APSI STANDOFF WEAPONS COMPLEX, MSA 2, ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, GUAM.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JACOBS GOVERNMENT SERVICES CO.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-05-13. End: 2026-10-31.

What is the track record of Jacobs Government Services Co. in delivering similar large-scale military design packages?

Jacobs Government Services Co. has a significant track record in providing engineering, design, and program management services for complex government and military projects. They have been involved in numerous large-scale infrastructure developments, including military bases, aerospace facilities, and critical infrastructure projects worldwide. Their experience often includes preparing detailed design-bid-build packages, master planning, and construction oversight for Department of Defense clients. Specific to Andersen Air Force Base, Jacobs has likely participated in various projects supporting its operational capabilities and infrastructure upgrades. A detailed review of their past performance on similar contracts, including client feedback and project outcomes, would provide further insight into their capabilities and reliability for this specific award.

How does the $3.5 million cost compare to similar design packages for military facilities of comparable size and complexity?

The $3.5 million award for preparing a design-bid-build package for the P-3001 APSI Standoff Weapons Complex at Andersen AFB appears to be within a reasonable range for projects of this nature. The scope includes full plans, specifications, and detailed cost estimates, which are comprehensive deliverables. Benchmarking against publicly available data for similar military construction design contracts (e.g., for barracks, hangars, or specialized operational facilities) suggests that costs for such extensive design work can range from hundreds of thousands to several million dollars, heavily influenced by the project's scale, technical requirements, and location. Given the strategic importance and complexity associated with a standoff weapons complex, this figure represents a significant but not necessarily excessive investment in the foundational design phase.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Key risks for this contract include potential scope creep if the initial requirements are not precisely defined, leading to increased costs or delays. Another risk is the contractor's ability to deliver the design package on time and to the required quality standards, impacting subsequent construction phases. Furthermore, unforeseen site conditions or changes in military requirements could necessitate design modifications. Mitigation strategies likely include robust government oversight of the design process, clear definition and management of contract scope, phased reviews and approvals of design milestones, and performance incentives or penalties tied to timely and quality delivery. The firm-fixed-price nature also shifts some cost-related risks to the contractor.

What is the expected effectiveness of this design package in supporting the future construction of the Standoff Weapons Complex?

The effectiveness of this design package hinges on the thoroughness and accuracy of the plans, specifications, and cost estimates prepared by Jacobs Government Services Co. A well-executed design-bid-build package should provide a clear, comprehensive, and constructible blueprint that minimizes ambiguity for potential construction contractors. This clarity is crucial for ensuring that the final facility meets all operational requirements for the Standoff Weapons Complex, adheres to security and safety standards, and can be built within a predictable budget and timeline. The detailed cost estimate is vital for budget validation and securing necessary construction funding. Ultimately, the effectiveness will be measured by the quality of the construction that results from these design documents.

How does historical spending on engineering services for Andersen Air Force Base compare to this specific award?

Historical spending on engineering services for Andersen Air Force Base is likely substantial, given its role as a major strategic hub in the Indo-Pacific. The base has undergone continuous development and modernization to support evolving mission requirements, including infrastructure upgrades for aircraft, munitions, and personnel. Specific award data for engineering services would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured (e.g., design, environmental, planning), and the prime contractors involved. This $3.5 million award for a specific complex's design package represents a significant but likely proportional investment within the broader context of Andersen AFB's ongoing infrastructure development and modernization efforts over the years.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 777 MAIN ST, FORT WORTH, TX, 76102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,526,398

Exercised Options: $3,526,398

Current Obligation: $3,526,398

Actual Outlays: $112,979

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 4

Total Subaward Amount: $345,104

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6274217D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline