DoD Navy Contract for Equipment Rental Exceeds $53M, Awarded to Prime Projects International

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $37,260,568 ($37.3M)

Contractor: Prime Projects International General Trading LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-09-28

End Date: 2011-06-17

Contract Duration: 2,088 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200512!601883!1700!N62470!NAV FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMA!N6247005C4110 !A!N! !N! ! !20050928!20070530!535269690!535269690!535269690!N!PRIME PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL L!5TH FLOOR TWIN TOWERS !DUBAI !AE!* !00000! !UK!* !* !UNITED KIN!+000004059300!N!N!000007308130!N054!INSTALLATION OF EQ/PREFAB STRUCTURES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !532490!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!002!B! !Z!N!Z!B!UK!N!L!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! !1700!N62470!0001! !

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $37.3 million to PRIME PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL GENERAL TRADING LLC for work described as: 200512!601883!1700!N62470!NAV FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMA!N6247005C4110 !A!N! !N! ! !20050928!20070530!535269690!535269690!535269690!N!PRIME PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL L!5TH FLOOR TWIN TOWERS !DUBAI !AE!* !00000! !UK!* !* … Key points: 1. The contract, valued at over $53 million, was awarded to Prime Projects International. 2. This award falls under the 'Other Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing' category. 3. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The duration of the contract was 2088 days, indicating a long-term need for these services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $53,526,969 is substantial for equipment rental services. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more specific details on the equipment and duration.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Awarded under full and open competition, this method typically allows for the widest range of potential bidders, fostering price discovery and potentially leading to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The substantial value of this contract means a significant portion of taxpayer funds is allocated to equipment rental, with the effectiveness of competition influencing the overall value for money.

Public Impact

Taxpayers are funding a significant contract for equipment rental services for the Navy. The long contract duration suggests a sustained operational requirement for the rented equipment. The award to an international company (based in Dubai, UAE) highlights the global reach of some government contracting.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns given the long duration and international vendor.
  • Lack of specific details on the type of equipment rented.
  • Limited information on the performance of Prime Projects International.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition.
  • Clear contract start and end dates provided.
  • Contract type is Firm Fixed Price, offering cost certainty.

Sector Analysis

The 'Other Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing' sector encompasses a broad range of services. Benchmarking this contract's value requires understanding the specific types of equipment and their market rates.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Prime Projects International General Trading LLC, which is not identified as a small business. There is no indication of small business subcontracting goals or achievements within the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, part of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract management offices within the Navy to ensure compliance and performance.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • High contract value.
  • Long contract duration.
  • International vendor.
  • Lack of specific equipment details.
  • Potential for logistical complexities.

Tags

other-commercial-and-industrial-machiner, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $37.3 million to PRIME PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL GENERAL TRADING LLC. 200512!601883!1700!N62470!NAV FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMA!N6247005C4110 !A!N! !N! ! !20050928!20070530!535269690!535269690!535269690!N!PRIME PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL L!5TH FLOOR TWIN TOWERS !DUBAI !AE!* !00000! !UK!* !* !UNITED KIN!+000004059300!N!N!000007308130!N054!INSTALLATION OF EQ/PREFAB STRUCTURES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !532490!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PRIME PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL GENERAL TRADING LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $37.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-09-28. End: 2011-06-17.

What specific types of equipment were rented under this contract, and how does their rental cost compare to market rates for similar equipment?

The provided data does not specify the exact types of equipment rented. The contract falls under NAICS code 532490 (Other Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing). Without this detail, a precise comparison to market rates is not feasible. However, the total value of over $53 million for a nearly 6-year period suggests significant equipment or long-term rental needs.

What risks are associated with awarding a long-term, high-value contract to an international vendor for equipment rental?

Risks include potential logistical challenges, currency exchange rate fluctuations, differing legal and regulatory environments, and difficulties in ensuring timely maintenance or replacement of equipment. Ensuring compliance with US government standards and performance expectations from an international vendor requires robust oversight and clear contractual terms.

How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure the best value for the government in this instance?

While 'full and open competition' is designed to maximize value, its effectiveness depends on the number and quality of bids received. The data does not reveal the number of bidders or the specific pricing strategies employed. The substantial contract value suggests a significant need, and the competitive process aimed to secure favorable terms, but a definitive assessment of 'best value' requires further analysis of the bidding landscape.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Real Estate and Rental and LeasingCommercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Rental and LeasingOther Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing

Product/Service Code: INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENTINSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5TH FLOOR TWIN TOWERS, DUBAI

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-09-28

Current End Date: 2011-06-17

Potential End Date: 2011-06-17 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2014-02-01

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending