DoD Awards $37.7M for NSF-3 Phase I to CAE USA INC., No Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $37,694,646 ($37.7M)
Contractor: CAE USA Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2019-09-26
End Date: 2025-01-31
Contract Duration: 1,954 days
Daily Burn Rate: $19.3K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NSF-3 PHASE I
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, TARRANT County, TEXAS, 76011
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $37.7 million to CAE USA INC. for work described as: NSF-3 PHASE I Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $37.7 million awarded. 2. Sole-source award indicates potential lack of competitive pressure. 3. Long contract duration of 1954 days (over 5 years) raises concerns about flexibility and potential cost overruns. 4. The 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing' sector is broad, making specific benchmarks difficult without more detail.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can incentivize contractors to increase costs to maximize their fixed fee. Without a competitive bidding process, it's difficult to assess if the $37.7 million price is reasonable compared to similar services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, meaning only one source was solicited. This limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive process.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for a contract of this magnitude means taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible value for their investment.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the absence of competitive bidding. The long contract duration could lock the government into a potentially suboptimal solution. Lack of transparency in the sole-source award process can erode public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Contract awarded to a specific company for a defined period.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls under 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing,' a broad category. Without more specific details on the 'NSF-3' system or service, it's challenging to provide precise sector benchmarks. However, large sole-source contracts in specialized manufacturing can often be subject to higher costs.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct benefit to small businesses from this specific award.
Oversight & Accountability
The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny. Further oversight is needed to ensure the justification for not competing the contract was sound and that the pricing is fair and reasonable.
Related Government Programs
- Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks competitive pressure.
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can incentivize cost increases.
- Long contract duration (1954 days) increases risk of cost overruns and inflexibility.
- Lack of transparency in procurement process.
- Potential for taxpayer overpayment due to non-competitive award.
Tags
other-commercial-and-service-industry-ma, department-of-defense, tx, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $37.7 million to CAE USA INC.. NSF-3 PHASE I
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CAE USA INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $37.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-09-26. End: 2025-01-31.
What is the specific nature of the 'NSF-3' system or service being procured, and why was it deemed necessary to sole-source this requirement?
The specific nature of the 'NSF-3' system or service is not detailed in the provided data. The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or a lack of viable alternative sources. Without further information, it's impossible to assess the validity of these potential justifications and whether they truly preclude competition.
What are the potential risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type over a 1954-day period for this type of machinery manufacturing?
A Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract can incentivize the contractor to increase costs, as their fixed fee remains constant regardless of the total project cost. Over a long duration like 1954 days, this risk is amplified, potentially leading to significant cost overruns. Without robust government oversight and detailed cost tracking, the government might end up paying substantially more than necessary.
How does the lack of competition impact the government's ability to ensure the effectiveness and value of the procured machinery or service?
The absence of competition significantly hinders the government's ability to ensure effectiveness and value. Without competing bids, there's no market validation of the proposed solution's capabilities or pricing. The government relies solely on the contractor's representations and its own internal assessment, which may be less rigorous than a competitive evaluation process, potentially leading to suboptimal performance or inflated costs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing › Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: N6134018R0006
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: CAE Inc
Address: 2200 ARLINGTON DOWNS RD, ARLINGTON, TX, 76011
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $40,778,737
Exercised Options: $37,694,646
Current Obligation: $37,694,646
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 1
Total Subaward Amount: $34,530
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6134018D0004
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-09-26
Current End Date: 2025-01-31
Potential End Date: 2025-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-12-16
More Contracts from CAE USA Inc.
- F-16 Training Simulators — $741.0M (Department of Defense)
- F-16 MTC Follow-On — $624.9M (Department of Defense)
- Other Aircraft Part and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing — $545.3M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $486.1M (Department of Defense)
- C-130H Aircrew Training System — $330.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)