DoD Awards $188.8M for Naval Air Warfare Center Training Services to BMH Associates Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,200,946 ($18.2M)

Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2002-12-18

End Date: 2018-12-31

Contract Duration: 5,857 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200303!000106!1700!A8301 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CNETER TRAININ!N6133903C0013 !A!N! !N! !20021218!20071218!188814206!188814206!188814206!N!BMH ASSOCIATES INC !5365 ROBIN HOOD RD !NORFOLK !VA!23513!57000!710!51!NORFOLK !NORFOLK (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000000409475!N!N!000017951291!AD93!RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-ADV TECH DEV !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!U!2!001!E! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !C! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: NORFOLK, NORFOLK CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23513

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.2 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: 200303!000106!1700!A8301 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CNETER TRAININ!N6133903C0013 !A!N! !N! !20021218!20071218!188814206!188814206!188814206!N!BMH ASSOCIATES INC !5365 ROBIN HOOD RD !NORFOLK !VA!23513!57000!710!51!NORFOLK !NORFO… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for essential training services to the Naval Air Warfare Center. 2. BMH Associates Inc. secured the contract, indicating a specific capability in defense training. 3. The contract's duration of over 15 years suggests a long-term need for these services. 4. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, implying a structured procurement process.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total contract value is $188.8 million over approximately 15 years. Without specific per-unit cost data or benchmarks for similar training services, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the extended duration suggests a significant investment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources. This method suggests that while competition was sought, certain sources were initially excluded, potentially impacting the breadth of price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The significant value of this contract represents a substantial allocation of taxpayer funds towards defense training infrastructure and services.

Public Impact

Ensures continued readiness and training for naval aviation personnel. Supports the operational capabilities of the Naval Air Warfare Center. Provides long-term employment and economic activity within the defense sector. Contributes to the technological advancement and maintenance of defense training systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Extended contract duration may lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
Potential for vendor lock-in due to the long-term nature of the services.
Lack of detailed cost breakdowns makes value assessment challenging.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting potential for fair pricing.
Long-term contract provides stability for service delivery.
Focus on critical defense training needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting defense technology development and training. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness and technological superiority.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division, indicating specific oversight for aviation training. The long duration necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Extended contract duration increases risk of cost escalation.
Potential for performance degradation over a long contract term.
Limited transparency on specific service details and cost breakdowns.
Competition method (exclusion of sources) warrants scrutiny for fairness.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.2 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 200303!000106!1700!A8301 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CNETER TRAININ!N6133903C0013 !A!N! !N! !20021218!20071218!188814206!188814206!188814206!N!BMH ASSOCIATES INC !5365 ROBIN HOOD RD !NORFOLK !VA!23513!57000!710!51!NORFOLK !NORFOLK (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000000409475!N!N!000017951291!AD93!RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-ADV TECH DEV !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-12-18. End: 2018-12-31.

What specific training services are being provided, and how do they align with current naval aviation needs?

The contract is for training services at the Naval Air Warfare Center. While the specific services are not detailed, they likely encompass a range of activities such as simulator training, curriculum development, and technical support for naval aviation systems. These services are critical for maintaining pilot proficiency, aircrew coordination, and the effective operation of advanced naval aircraft.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being measured?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or the methods used for measuring BMH Associates Inc.'s performance. Effective oversight would require clearly defined metrics related to training effectiveness, simulator availability, curriculum relevance, and adherence to schedules and budget. Regular performance reviews are essential to ensure the contractor meets these standards.

How does the cost of these training services compare to industry benchmarks for similar long-term defense contracts?

Benchmarking the cost of these training services is challenging without more granular data on the specific services provided and their associated costs. The total contract value of $188.8 million over approximately 15 years ($12.58 million annually) needs to be compared against similar long-term, specialized defense training contracts. Factors like the complexity of the training, technology involved, and geographic location influence pricing.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: BASIC RESEARCH

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Alion Science and Technology Corporation (UEI: 119162332)

Address: 1000 BURR RIDGE PKWY STE 202, BURR RIDGE, IL, 60527

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline