DoD Awards $94M for Family Housing Facilities Construction at Whidbey Island NAS

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,271,417 ($11.3M)

Contractor: Landmark Construction Corporat

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2000-04-11

End Date: 2008-09-04

Contract Duration: 3,068 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200007!1700!025123!C4255 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING FIE!N4425597C5515 !A!*!* !20000411!20021023!942755372!942755372!942755372!N!1FDZ0!LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORAT!4360 MONTEBELLO DR S. !COLORADO SPRIN !CO!80918!78155!029!53!WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS !ISLAND !WASHINGTON!0001!+000009878026!N!N!000000000000!Y161!FAMILY HOUSING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !1521!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !U!J!2!005!K!* !D!W!Z!* !* !N!A!N!*!*!A!B!A!A!* !D!N!A!B!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Place of Performance

Location: OAK HARBOR, ISLAND County, WASHINGTON, 98278

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.3 million to LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORAT for work described as: 200007!1700!025123!C4255 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING FIE!N4425597C5515 !A!*!* !20000411!20021023!942755372!942755372!942755372!N!1FDZ0!LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORAT!4360 MONTEBELLO DR S. !COLORADO SPRIN !CO!80918!78155!029!53!WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS !ISL… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Landmark Construction Corporation for family housing facilities. 2. Significant duration of 3068 days suggests a large-scale, long-term project. 3. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources indicates a specific procurement strategy. 4. The $94M value represents a substantial investment in military infrastructure.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $94,275,537 is a significant amount for construction services. Without specific benchmarks for similar family housing projects at naval facilities, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the duration and scope suggest a complex undertaking.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This suggests that while competition was sought, certain sources may have been excluded based on specific criteria, potentially impacting the breadth of price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The $94M expenditure represents taxpayer funds allocated to improving military family housing, which can have long-term benefits for service members and their families.

Public Impact

Enhances quality of life for military families stationed at Whidbey Island Naval Air Station. Supports the Department of Defense's commitment to providing adequate housing for service members. Potential for job creation in the construction sector and related industries. Long-term infrastructure improvement for a key naval installation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns given the long contract duration.
Effectiveness of 'exclusion of sources' in ensuring optimal pricing.
Long-term maintenance and operational costs not detailed.

Positive Signals

Addresses critical need for family housing.
Awarded to a single contractor for streamlined execution.
Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically for family housing facilities. Construction spending for military infrastructure can vary significantly based on location, project scope, and prevailing market conditions. Benchmarks for similar projects would be needed for a precise comparison.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting opportunities were included or pursued.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Navy. Oversight would typically involve contract management teams ensuring adherence to terms, quality standards, and timely completion.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration increases risk of cost escalation.
Ambiguity in 'exclusion of sources' could limit competition.
Potential for performance issues over an extended period.
Lack of detailed information on long-term maintenance costs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.3 million to LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORAT. 200007!1700!025123!C4255 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING FIE!N4425597C5515 !A!*!* !20000411!20021023!942755372!942755372!942755372!N!1FDZ0!LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORAT!4360 MONTEBELLO DR S. !COLORADO SPRIN !CO!80918!78155!029!53!WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS !ISLAND !WASHINGTON!0001!+000009878026!N!N!000000000000!Y161!FAMILY HOUSING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !1521!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !U!J!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORAT.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-04-11. End: 2008-09-04.

What specific criteria led to the exclusion of certain sources in this 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' procurement, and how did this impact the final price?

The specific criteria for excluding sources are not detailed in the provided data. This procurement method suggests that while competition was intended, only a subset of potential offerors met predefined requirements. This could potentially limit price competition compared to unrestricted full and open competition, possibly leading to a higher price than could have been achieved otherwise.

Given the 3068-day duration, what are the potential risks associated with material cost escalation and contractor performance over such a long period?

A contract duration of over 3000 days presents significant risks of material cost escalation, especially in the volatile construction market. Contractor performance can also degrade over extended periods due to personnel turnover or shifting priorities. Robust contract clauses for price adjustments and performance monitoring are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How does the $94M investment in family housing facilities at Whidbey Island NAS align with broader DoD housing strategies and impact overall military readiness?

This investment likely aligns with the DoD's strategy to improve the quality of life for service members and their families, which is directly linked to retention and readiness. Adequate, modern housing can reduce stress on military personnel, allowing them to focus better on their duties, thereby indirectly boosting overall military effectiveness.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 4360 MONTEBELLO DR S., COLORADO SPRIN, CO, 80918

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline