DoD's $29.5M Facilities Support Services Task Order to Chugach Federal Solutions shows strong competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $29,478,741 ($29.5M)
Contractor: Chugach Federal Solutions LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-10-01
End Date: 2018-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $81.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF X789 FY18 RECURRING WORK TASK ORDER
Place of Performance
Location: SILVERDALE, KITSAP County, WASHINGTON, 98315
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $29.5 million to CHUGACH FEDERAL SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF X789 FY18 RECURRING WORK TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the scope of facilities support services. 2. Full and open competition indicates a healthy market for these services. 3. No immediate risk indicators are apparent from the contract data. 4. Performance context is a recurring work task order, suggesting ongoing needs. 5. This contract fits within the broader facilities management sector for government services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $29.5 million for a one-year period for facilities support services appears to be within a reasonable range for a large-scale government contract. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that cost risks are largely borne by the contractor, which can be favorable for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but the designation suggests a competitive process. A competitive award generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to bid, driving down prices and ensuring the government receives competitive offers for its facilities support needs.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense benefits from reliable facilities support services, ensuring operational readiness. Services delivered likely include maintenance, repair, and management of facilities. The geographic impact is centered in Washington (ST: WA), supporting military installations or government facilities in that region. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for individuals in facilities management and related trades.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust market.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Recurring work task order indicates a sustained need and potential for stable service delivery.
Sector Analysis
Facilities support services represent a significant segment of the government contracting market, encompassing a wide range of activities from routine maintenance to specialized technical support. This contract, valued at nearly $30 million, falls within the mid-to-large range for individual task orders in this sector. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 (Facilities Support Services) covers establishments primarily engaged in providing operating and maintaining facilities services. Spending in this sector is driven by the government's need to maintain its vast real estate portfolio and operational infrastructure.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that small business participation (SB: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific task order. While the prime contractor is Chugach Federal Solutions LLC, a large business, there may be subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the scope of facilities support services. Further analysis of subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the Department of the Navy contracting officers and program managers. The firm-fixed-price nature of the award provides a degree of cost control. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Any specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on the nature of any potential issues or audits related to performance or financial accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Base Operations Support (BOS)
- Government Property Management Services
- Department of Defense Facilities Management
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, facilities-management, recurring-work, washington, large-business
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $29.5 million to CHUGACH FEDERAL SOLUTIONS LLC. IGF::OT::IGF X789 FY18 RECURRING WORK TASK ORDER
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHUGACH FEDERAL SOLUTIONS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $29.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-10-01. End: 2018-09-30.
What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the Department of the Navy in Washington?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the Department of the Navy in Washington requires access to detailed historical contract databases. However, generally, federal agencies like the Navy maintain a consistent need for facilities support across their installations. Spending in this category can fluctuate based on infrastructure upgrades, new construction, or changes in operational requirements. The recurring nature of this task order suggests a stable, ongoing requirement. To provide a precise historical comparison, one would need to query databases like FPDS-NG or USASpending.gov for contracts awarded under NAICS code 561210 to the Department of the Navy within the specified geographic region over several fiscal years, looking at both prime contract awards and task orders against IDIQs.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar facilities support services?
Directly comparing the awarded price of $29.5 million to precise market rates for similar facilities support services is challenging without detailed service breakdowns and specific geographic market data. However, the fact that this contract was awarded under full and open competition suggests that the pricing was deemed competitive by multiple bidders. Federal agencies often use market research and cost realism analyses during the procurement process to ensure fair and reasonable pricing. The firm-fixed-price structure also implies that the contractor has factored in market conditions and their own cost structures to arrive at a bid that they believe is profitable and competitive. Further analysis would involve obtaining detailed service scopes and comparing them to commercial service agreements in the Washington region.
What is Chugach Federal Solutions LLC's track record with similar government contracts?
Chugach Federal Solutions LLC has a significant track record of performing government contracts, particularly in areas related to facilities management, logistics, and base operations support. As a large business, they have experience managing complex, high-value contracts across various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense. Their performance history, typically available through sources like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), would provide insights into their past delivery, quality of service, and adherence to contract terms. A review of CPARS data would reveal ratings from previous government customers, highlighting any areas of excellence or concern, which is crucial for assessing their capability to execute this specific task order effectively.
What are the potential risks associated with this type of facilities support contract?
Potential risks associated with this type of facilities support contract include scope creep, where the requirements expand beyond the original agreement, leading to cost overruns if not managed properly. Contractor performance issues, such as failure to meet service level agreements or quality standards, are also a risk. Furthermore, unforeseen facility issues, like major structural problems or environmental hazards, could arise, impacting both cost and schedule. For a firm-fixed-price contract, the primary risk to the government is ensuring the contractor adequately resourced the contract to meet all obligations. Robust oversight, clear communication, and a well-defined performance management plan are essential to mitigate these risks.
How effective are facilities support services in ensuring the operational readiness of DoD installations?
Facilities support services are critical to ensuring the operational readiness of Department of Defense installations. These services encompass a wide range of activities, including maintenance, repair, custodial services, groundskeeping, and utility management, all of which directly impact the functionality and safety of military bases and facilities. Well-maintained infrastructure and reliable utility services are fundamental for troop housing, training, equipment storage, and command and control operations. Ineffective facilities support can lead to disruptions, safety hazards, and decreased morale, thereby hindering the ability of installations to support their primary missions. Therefore, robust and efficient facilities support is a cornerstone of military readiness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N4425510R5016
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Chugach Alaska Corporation
Address: 3800 CENTERPOINT DR STE 700, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $29,478,741
Exercised Options: $29,478,741
Current Obligation: $29,478,741
Actual Outlays: $11,212
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 7
Total Subaward Amount: $6,920,888
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N4425514D9000
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-10-01
Current End Date: 2018-09-30
Potential End Date: 2018-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-09-12
More Contracts from Chugach Federal Solutions LLC
- Phase-In Wake Island (WI) — $268.8M (Department of Defense)
- Installation Support Services (ISS) Throughout Redstone Arsenal for the US Army Garrison-Redstone, Directorate of Public Works. This Effort Consists of Mail Pickup and Delivery, Logistics Support Warehousing, Receive/Store/Move/Issue Supply Classes I-X (except V), Petroleum Issue Point, Vehicle Maintenance, Motor Pool Operations, Asset Management, Retail Supply Services; Public Works Facility Maintenance, Heating and Cooling Services, Landfill Operations, Snow/Ice Removal/Street Sweeping, Miscellaneous Engineering Activities, and Water Services for the Entire Post for the Period of 01 April 2011 Through 31 March 2012 — $147.0M (Department of Defense)
- Critical Functions: the Contractor Shall Provide Facility Operation and Maintenance Services (foms) for the Goddard Space Flight Center (gsfc), Greenbelt, Maryland. for the Purpose of This Contract, "gsfc" Herein Refers to the Gsfc Facility in Greenbelt, Maryland Only. ALL Requirements Listed in This Statement of Work ARE Baseline Except for Those Specifically Designated AS Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (idiq) Which Will BE Procured Through Issuance of Task Orders (TO) — $140.9M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Recurring Work, FY15, OP 1 — $34.9M (Department of Defense)
- Purchase Recurring Work Clin and Selected Non-Recurring Work Slins for Fiscal Year 2016 — $32.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)