Naval Facilities Engineering Command awarded $18.2M contract for industrial building construction, with Anthony Construction Company as the prime

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,266,233 ($10.3M)

Contractor: Anthony Construction Company, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-08-18

End Date: 2005-11-30

Contract Duration: 835 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200311!187439!1700!C4255 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING FIE!N4425503C1007 !A!N! !N! !20030818!20051130!181852617!181852617!181852617!N!ANTHONY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, !8110 7TH AVE S !SEATTLE !WA!98108!07695!035!53!BREMERTON !KITSAP !WASHINGTON!+000008549967!N!N!000000000000!Y159!OTHER INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !236210!A!B!3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!003!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! !B!D! !A!A!000!A!B!Y!S!Y! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: BREMERTON, KITSAP County, WASHINGTON, 98314

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.3 million to ANTHONY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. for work described as: 200311!187439!1700!C4255 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING FIE!N4425503C1007 !A!N! !N! !20030818!20051130!181852617!181852617!181852617!N!ANTHONY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, !8110 7TH AVE S !SEATTLE !WA!98108!07695!035!53!BREMERTON !KITSA… Key points: 1. The contract value of $18.2 million for industrial building construction represents a significant investment in naval infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract are not detailed, but the award suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. The fixed-price contract type indicates a defined scope and cost, potentially mitigating cost overrun risks. 4. The contract duration of 835 days suggests a substantial project requiring sustained effort and oversight. 5. The geographic location in Bremerton, Washington, points to a specific regional need for facility upgrades or construction. 6. The primary contractor, Anthony Construction Company, Inc., is responsible for delivering the specified construction services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $18.2 million for industrial building construction is a substantial amount. Benchmarking this against similar projects would require detailed cost breakdowns and scope comparisons. Without specific details on the scope of work and the prevailing market rates for industrial building construction in the Bremerton, Washington area during the contract period (2003-2005), a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests an attempt to control costs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified in the provided data, but the designation implies a competitive environment. This level of competition is generally expected to drive down prices and encourage efficiency from contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining the best possible price for the required services through market forces.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Department of the Navy, which will receive upgraded or new industrial building facilities. The services delivered include the construction of industrial buildings, essential for supporting naval operations and maintenance. The geographic impact is concentrated in Bremerton, Washington, likely supporting the Naval Base Kitsap. The contract has implications for the construction workforce in the Seattle-Tacoma metropolitan area, providing employment opportunities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the number of bidders limits the assessment of competitive intensity.
The provided data does not include performance metrics or quality assessments for Anthony Construction Company on this contract.
The contract duration of over two years could present challenges in managing scope changes or unforeseen issues.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
Fixed-price contract type can provide cost certainty for the government.
The contract is for essential industrial building construction, supporting critical naval infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically focusing on Industrial Building Construction (NAICS code 236210). The market for industrial construction is driven by demand for manufacturing, logistics, and specialized facilities. Federal spending in this area often supports military bases, research facilities, and critical infrastructure projects. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific type and scale of industrial buildings required.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (SS=false, SB=false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications specifically mandated for small businesses through a set-aside program. However, the prime contractor, Anthony Construction Company, Inc., may still engage small businesses as subcontractors based on their own procurement practices.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), which is responsible for planning, designing, and constructing facilities for the Navy and Marine Corps. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Naval Base Construction
Military Infrastructure Projects
Industrial Facility Development
Department of Defense Construction Contracts
Federal Building and Infrastructure Spending

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Limited Performance Data
Scope Specificity

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.3 million to ANTHONY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.. 200311!187439!1700!C4255 !NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING FIE!N4425503C1007 !A!N! !N! !20030818!20051130!181852617!181852617!181852617!N!ANTHONY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, !8110 7TH AVE S !SEATTLE !WA!98108!07695!035!53!BREMERTON !KITSAP !WASHINGTON!+000008549967!N!N!000000000000!Y159!OTHER INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !236210!A!B!3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ANTHONY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-08-18. End: 2005-11-30.

What was the specific scope of work for the industrial building construction under this contract?

The provided data identifies the contract under NAICS code 236210, 'Industrial Building Construction,' and the Product Service Code (PSC) as C4255, 'Other Industrial Buildings.' This suggests the contract was for the construction or renovation of facilities intended for industrial purposes, which could include manufacturing plants, warehouses, maintenance facilities, or other specialized industrial structures. However, the precise details of the scope of work, such as square footage, specific functionalities, or materials, are not elaborated in the summary data. A more detailed review of the contract's statement of work would be necessary to understand the full scope.

How does the contract value of $18.2 million compare to similar industrial building construction projects awarded by the Navy or DoD?

Comparing the $18.2 million contract value requires access to a broader dataset of similar projects awarded by the Department of the Navy or the Department of Defense during the same period (2003-2005) for industrial building construction. Without such comparative data, it is difficult to definitively state whether this contract represents a high, low, or average value. Factors influencing cost include project size, complexity, location, and specific requirements. The fixed-price nature suggests a defined scope, which aids in cost control, but the overall value benchmark requires more extensive market analysis.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or quality standards expected for this construction project?

The provided data does not explicitly list the key performance indicators (KPIs) or quality standards for this specific contract. However, federal construction contracts typically include detailed specifications regarding materials, workmanship, safety protocols, and adherence to building codes and standards (e.g., by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or specific Navy standards). Performance would likely be monitored by government representatives on-site, with potential penalties for non-compliance or delays. Final acceptance would depend on meeting all contractual quality requirements.

What is the track record of Anthony Construction Company, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of the Navy?

The provided data indicates that Anthony Construction Company, Inc. was the prime contractor for this $18.2 million industrial building construction contract awarded by the Department of the Navy. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their history of federal contract awards, including the number of contracts, their values, performance ratings, and any past issues or disputes. Information from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) would be crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of their past performance and reliability with federal agencies.

Were there any significant cost changes or contract modifications throughout the life of this contract?

The provided summary data does not detail any contract modifications or significant cost changes that may have occurred during the life of this contract (August 18, 2003, to November 30, 2005). Federal contracts, especially those spanning over two years, can sometimes undergo modifications due to unforeseen circumstances, changes in requirements, or scope adjustments. A thorough review of the contract's official modification history, if available through procurement databases, would be necessary to determine if any such changes occurred and their impact on the final cost.

What is the significance of the PSC code C4255 (Other Industrial Buildings) in understanding the project's purpose?

The Product Service Code (PSC) C4255, 'Other Industrial Buildings,' signifies that the contract was for the construction or provision of buildings that serve an industrial purpose but do not fit into more specific categories like manufacturing plants or specialized workshops. This could encompass a wide range of structures, such as large storage facilities, maintenance depots, assembly areas, or support buildings for industrial operations. Understanding this code helps categorize the federal spending and allows for comparison with other contracts for similar types of industrial infrastructure.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Industrial Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 8110 7TH AVE S, SEATTLE, WA, 98108

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline