Navy Awards $19.4M Engineering Contract for Cherry Point Sustainment Center Support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,381,612 ($19.4M)

Contractor: HDR Engineering, Inc of the Carolinas

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-01-10

End Date: 2029-07-07

Contract Duration: 3,466 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUSTAINMENT CENTER CHERRY POINTAE SUPPORT TO PO

Place of Performance

Location: CHERRY POINT, CRAVEN County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28533

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.4 million to HDR ENGINEERING, INC OF THE CAROLINAS for work described as: SUSTAINMENT CENTER CHERRY POINTAE SUPPORT TO PO Key points: 1. Contract value of $19.4 million over its term. 2. Competition was full and open, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. Risk appears moderate given the long duration and fixed-price nature. 4. Sector is Engineering Services, supporting defense infrastructure.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $19.4 million over nearly 10 years suggests a reasonable annual spend. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering support contracts would provide a clearer picture of pricing efficiency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The fixed-price contract type further incentivizes cost control by the contractor.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it drives down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

Supports critical infrastructure maintenance and operations at a naval facility. Long-term contract provides stability for sustainment operations. Potential for follow-on work or expansion based on performance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Long contract duration (nearly 10 years) could lead to scope creep or price escalation if not managed effectively.
  • Reliance on a single firm for extended support may limit future innovation or cost-saving opportunities.
  • Fixed-price contracts can sometimes lead to contractors cutting corners if not closely monitored.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
  • Firm fixed-price contract type aligns incentives for cost control.
  • Long-term nature provides predictable support for essential operations.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting defense infrastructure. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on project scale and duration, but long-term sustainment contracts are common for maintaining critical government facilities.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to HDR ENGINEERING, INC OF THE CAROLINAS, a large business. There is no indication of specific set-asides for small businesses in this award, suggesting limited direct participation for SMBs in this prime contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The long duration of this contract necessitates robust oversight from the Department of the Navy to ensure performance standards are met and costs remain within expectations. Regular performance reviews and contract modifications will be crucial.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration may increase risk of cost overruns or scope creep.
  • Potential for contractor performance degradation over an extended period.
  • Lack of explicit small business participation noted.
  • Dependence on a single entity for critical sustainment functions.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, nc, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.4 million to HDR ENGINEERING, INC OF THE CAROLINAS. SUSTAINMENT CENTER CHERRY POINTAE SUPPORT TO PO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HDR ENGINEERING, INC OF THE CAROLINAS.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-01-10. End: 2029-07-07.

What is the estimated annual cost for this engineering support, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities?

The total contract value is $19.4 million over approximately 3466 days (about 9.5 years). This equates to an average annual cost of roughly $2.04 million. Benchmarking this against similar sustainment contracts for large military installations would be necessary to determine if it represents good value. Factors like the complexity of the facility and specific services required would influence this comparison.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will the government ensure the contractor meets them over the long term?

While specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided data, typical indicators for such contracts include response times, quality of work, adherence to safety standards, and successful completion of maintenance tasks. The Department of the Navy will likely employ a contract officer's representative (COR) and conduct regular performance reviews to monitor progress and ensure compliance. Contract clauses addressing performance failures would also be in place.

Are there any provisions for incorporating new technologies or more efficient engineering practices over the contract's nearly decade-long term?

The provided data does not explicitly mention provisions for incorporating new technologies or practices. However, a well-structured contract of this duration often includes mechanisms for contract modifications or change orders to allow for the integration of improved methods or technologies, especially if they offer cost savings or enhanced performance. The government's proactive management would be key to leveraging such opportunities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICESARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: HDR, Inc

Address: 440 S CHURCH ST STE 1000, CHARLOTTE, NC, 28202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,381,612

Exercised Options: $19,381,612

Current Obligation: $19,381,612

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 5

Total Subaward Amount: $1,068,257

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N4008518D0601

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-01-10

Current End Date: 2029-07-07

Potential End Date: 2029-07-07 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-19

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending