Naval Air Station Patuxent River Hangar 111 Renovation Awarded for $12.3M Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,292,587 ($12.3M)

Contractor: G-W Management Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-11-07

End Date: 2026-01-14

Contract Duration: 799 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: HANGAR 111 PHASE IV ROADSIDE LEAN-TO RENOVATION NAVAL AIR STATION PATUXENT RIVER MD

Place of Performance

Location: PATUXENT RIVER, SAINT MARYS County, MARYLAND, 20670

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.3 million to G-W MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC for work described as: HANGAR 111 PHASE IV ROADSIDE LEAN-TO RENOVATION NAVAL AIR STATION PATUXENT RIVER MD Key points: 1. The contract value of $12.3 million for Hangar 111 Phase IV Renovation appears reasonable for a commercial and institutional building construction project of this scope. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process that should drive favorable pricing. 3. The project duration of 799 days (approximately 2.2 years) indicates a substantial renovation effort. 4. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor, G-W Management Services, LLC. 5. This project falls under the broader category of facility maintenance and renovation within the Department of Defense. 6. The award was a delivery order, implying it is part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $12.3 million for the Hangar 111 Phase IV Renovation is within a typical range for significant building construction and renovation projects. Benchmarking against similar projects for facility upgrades at military installations would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor has assumed the risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government when the scope is well-defined. Without specific details on the scope of work, a direct per-square-foot cost comparison is difficult, but the overall investment seems aligned with substantial infrastructure improvements.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that the solicitation was made available to all responsible prospective contractors, but specific sources were excluded for reasons not detailed here. The presence of 5 bids suggests a healthy level of competition for this project. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of technical solutions, benefiting the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition, with multiple bids received, is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of securing the best value and competitive pricing for the renovation work.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Navy and Naval Air Station Patuxent River, which will receive upgraded hangar facilities. The project will deliver essential renovation and modernization services to a critical military aviation infrastructure asset. The geographic impact is localized to Naval Air Station Patuxent River in Maryland. The project will likely involve a workforce of construction professionals and tradespeople in the Maryland region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if renovation requirements are not precisely defined.
Risk of unforeseen site conditions impacting schedule and cost.
Dependence on contractor's ability to manage complex construction timelines.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract mitigates cost escalation risk for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
Award to G-W Management Services, LLC, implies they met technical and performance requirements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The Department of Defense is a significant investor in maintaining and upgrading its vast real property portfolio, including aviation facilities. Spending in this area is driven by the need for operational readiness, modernization of aging infrastructure, and compliance with safety and environmental standards. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale construction and renovation contracts awarded by the military for similar facility types.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While G-W Management Services, LLC is the prime contractor, there is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if the prime contractor intends to utilize small business subcontractors, which could impact the small business ecosystem in the region.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) at Patuxent River. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract means oversight will focus on schedule adherence, quality of work, and compliance with contract terms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Naval Air Station Infrastructure Modernization
Military Construction Projects
Department of Defense Facilities Management
Aviation Hangar Construction and Renovation

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep
Unforeseen site conditions
Contractor performance risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.3 million to G-W MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC. HANGAR 111 PHASE IV ROADSIDE LEAN-TO RENOVATION NAVAL AIR STATION PATUXENT RIVER MD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is G-W MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-11-07. End: 2026-01-14.

What is the specific scope of work included in the Hangar 111 Phase IV Renovation?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for the Hangar 111 Phase IV Renovation. However, given the project title and the nature of hangar renovations, it likely includes structural repairs, upgrades to electrical and mechanical systems, potential improvements to hangar doors, flooring, lighting, and possibly specialized equipment integration. The 'Phase IV' designation suggests this is part of a multi-stage renovation effort for the facility. A comprehensive understanding of the scope is crucial for a thorough value assessment and to identify potential risks associated with unforeseen conditions.

How does the awarded amount of $12.3 million compare to similar hangar renovation projects at other naval installations?

Directly comparing the $12.3 million award to similar projects requires access to a database of comparable federal construction contracts, including details on square footage, scope of work, and specific renovation types. However, for a significant renovation of a large aviation hangar, this figure appears to be within a reasonable range. Factors influencing cost include the age and condition of the existing structure, the complexity of required upgrades (e.g., specialized environmental controls, aircraft maintenance equipment integration), and local labor and material costs. Without more granular data on comparable projects, it's difficult to definitively benchmark the value, but it does not immediately appear excessive for a project of this nature.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) being used to monitor the contractor's progress and performance?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract. However, for a construction project of this type, typical KPIs would likely include adherence to the project schedule (milestones and overall completion date), quality of workmanship (meeting specifications and industry standards), safety compliance (incident rates), and budget management (though less critical for the government under a firm-fixed-price contract unless change orders arise). The contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring these aspects throughout the project lifecycle.

What is the track record of G-W Management Services, LLC on similar federal construction contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of G-W Management Services, LLC on similar federal construction contracts is not provided in the data. A comprehensive assessment would involve reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), the types and scale of previous projects they have completed for the government, and any history of disputes or contract terminations. Their selection as the awardee suggests they met the government's criteria for responsibility and capability, but a deeper dive into their performance history would offer further insight into their reliability for this project.

What are the potential risks associated with the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award type?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award type implies that while the competition was intended to be open, certain potential sources were deliberately excluded. The reasons for exclusion are not specified but could range from non-responsiveness in a prior phase, failure to meet specific pre-qualification criteria, or other factors deemed necessary by the agency. The primary risk is that excluding potential bidders, even if justified, might inadvertently limit the pool of highly competitive offers, potentially impacting the final price or solution. Transparency regarding the reasons for exclusion is important for ensuring fairness and maximizing competition.

How does the duration of 799 days (approx. 2.2 years) impact the overall cost-effectiveness and operational readiness of the facility?

A project duration of approximately 2.2 years for a hangar renovation is substantial and suggests a complex scope of work. While a longer duration can sometimes lead to higher indirect costs (e.g., project management, site security), it may be necessary to ensure thoroughness and minimize disruption to ongoing operations at the air station. From a cost-effectiveness standpoint, the key is whether the extended timeline allows for high-quality execution without unnecessary delays. Operationally, the extended renovation period means the facility will be out of full service for a significant time, potentially requiring the Navy to reallocate resources or utilize alternative facilities, impacting readiness during the construction phase.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N4008023R0029

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5010 NICHOLSON LN STE 200, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20852

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,292,587

Exercised Options: $12,292,587

Current Obligation: $12,292,587

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N4008021D0022

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline