DoD Navy awards $4.9M contract for engineering services to Raymond Pond JV for USSS PRO analysis
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,911,955 ($4.9M)
Contractor: Raymond Pond Full Service Solutions JV LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2021-09-08
End Date: 2027-01-28
Contract Duration: 1,968 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Engineering Services
Official Description: DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (AOA) AND CONCEPT STUDY FOR USSS PRO
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20374
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $4.9 million to RAYMOND POND FULL SERVICE SOLUTIONS JV LLC for work described as: DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (AOA) AND CONCEPT STUDY FOR USSS PRO Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a joint venture, indicating potential for specialized expertise. 2. The contract duration is substantial (1968 days), suggesting a complex and long-term project. 3. The procurement method, 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' warrants scrutiny regarding justification. 4. Engineering Services sector is critical for defense infrastructure development.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $4.9M for engineering services over nearly 5 years appears reasonable for a complex analysis of alternatives and concept study. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering studies would provide a more definitive assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The competition method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' suggests that while initially open, specific sources were later excluded. This method can impact price discovery if the exclusion was not fully justified or if it limited the pool of qualified bidders.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential defense engineering services. The effectiveness of the competition method in securing the best value will determine the ultimate taxpayer impact.
Public Impact
Supports the development and modernization of naval assets. Ensures thorough analysis and concept development before major program commitment. Contributes to the engineering services sector, supporting specialized technical expertise.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Justification for exclusion of sources needs review.
- Long contract duration may pose scope creep risks.
- Potential for sole-source justification if competition was limited.
Positive Signals
- Award to a joint venture can bring diverse expertise.
- Focus on analysis of alternatives is a prudent early-stage investment.
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is vital for government projects requiring specialized technical design and analysis. Spending in this sector is often driven by defense, infrastructure, and research initiatives.
Small Business Impact
The awardee is a joint venture, which may include small business participation. However, the data does not explicitly state the small business status of the prime contractor or any subcontracting plans.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Navy is responsible for oversight. The 'Exclusion of Sources' clause requires careful review to ensure fair competition and prevent potential abuses.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential lack of robust competition due to source exclusion.
- Long contract duration increases risk of cost escalation.
- Need for clear justification for excluding sources.
- Potential for scope creep over the extended performance period.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, dc, delivery-order, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $4.9 million to RAYMOND POND FULL SERVICE SOLUTIONS JV LLC. DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (AOA) AND CONCEPT STUDY FOR USSS PRO
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RAYMOND POND FULL SERVICE SOLUTIONS JV LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-09-08. End: 2027-01-28.
What was the specific justification for excluding sources in this 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' procurement?
The justification for excluding sources is critical for understanding the competitive landscape. Typically, such exclusions are based on specific technical capabilities, past performance, or unique requirements that only a limited number of entities can meet. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if the competition was truly maximized or if potential bidders were unfairly disadvantaged, impacting the final price and value.
How does the long contract duration (1968 days) impact the risk of cost overruns or scope creep for this engineering services contract?
A long contract duration increases the inherent risk of cost overruns and scope creep, especially in complex engineering projects. Unforeseen technical challenges, evolving requirements, or market fluctuations can necessitate contract modifications, potentially increasing the total cost. Robust contract management, clear milestones, and change control processes are essential to mitigate these risks and ensure the project stays within budget and on track.
What is the expected impact of this 'Analysis of Alternatives' (AOA) and concept study on future defense spending and program effectiveness?
A well-executed AOA and concept study are designed to identify the most effective and cost-efficient solutions, thereby optimizing future defense spending. By thoroughly evaluating options early on, this process aims to prevent investment in suboptimal or overly expensive programs. The effectiveness of this study will directly influence the success and value derived from subsequent development and procurement phases, ultimately impacting national security capabilities.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1224 ROYAL DR SW STE 100, CONYERS, GA, 30094
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,911,955
Exercised Options: $4,911,955
Current Obligation: $4,911,955
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N4008021D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-09-08
Current End Date: 2027-01-28
Potential End Date: 2027-01-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-05
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)