DoD's $21.7M Presidential Aircraft Complex Design Contract Awarded to FSB-Pond JV Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,707,954 ($21.7M)

Contractor: FSB - Pond Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-11-14

End Date: 2027-01-31

Contract Duration: 3,730 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF A-E DESIGN SERVICES FOR PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT RECAPITALIZATION (PAR) COMPLEX AT JOINT BASE ANDREWS IN CAMP SPRINGS, MD

Place of Performance

Location: JB ANDREWS, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20762

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $21.7 million to FSB - POND JOINT VENTURE for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF A-E DESIGN SERVICES FOR PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT RECAPITALIZATION (PAR) COMPLEX AT JOINT BASE ANDREWS IN CAMP SPRINGS, MD Key points: 1. The contract is for engineering services related to the Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization (PAR) Complex. 2. Awarded to FSB-Pond Joint Venture, indicating a specific capability sought by the Department of the Navy. 3. The project spans over 10 years, suggesting a long-term, complex undertaking. 4. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for this significant infrastructure project.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $21.7 million for engineering design services appears reasonable for a project of this scale and duration, especially considering the specialized nature of presidential aircraft facilities.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process and a competitive bidding environment. This method likely resulted in a fair market price for the engineering services.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for taxpayer value, ensuring that the government receives competitive pricing for essential services.

Public Impact

Enhances critical infrastructure supporting presidential air transport. Ensures the long-term operational readiness of presidential aircraft. Supports national security by maintaining vital transportation assets. Potential for job creation in engineering and related fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 58 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Long contract duration (over 10 years) increases risk of cost overruns or scope creep.
  • Potential for unforeseen technical challenges in designing specialized aircraft facilities.

Positive Signals

  • Firm-fixed-price contract helps mitigate cost uncertainty.
  • Full and open competition suggests a competitive award process.
  • Awarded by the Department of the Navy, implying experienced oversight.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under engineering services within the broader construction and defense sectors. Spending benchmarks for similar large-scale, specialized government infrastructure projects can vary widely, but the value appears aligned with complex design requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the award went to a joint venture (FSB - POND JOINT VENTURE). Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation within this joint venture or as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the Department of the Navy, a component of the Department of Defense, which typically has established oversight mechanisms for major procurements. The long duration necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration increases potential for cost escalation and scope creep.
  • Complexity of specialized aircraft facilities may lead to unforeseen design challenges.
  • Dependence on a single joint venture for over a decade requires close monitoring.
  • Potential for changes in presidential requirements over the contract period.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, md, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $21.7 million to FSB - POND JOINT VENTURE. IGF::OT::IGF A-E DESIGN SERVICES FOR PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT RECAPITALIZATION (PAR) COMPLEX AT JOINT BASE ANDREWS IN CAMP SPRINGS, MD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FSB - POND JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-11-14. End: 2027-01-31.

What specific engineering challenges are anticipated for the Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization Complex, and how does the awarded firm's experience address these?

The Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization Complex likely involves intricate design requirements for specialized hangars, maintenance facilities, and security infrastructure to accommodate presidential aircraft. Anticipated challenges may include environmental controls, blast resistance, and integration of advanced technology. FSB-Pond Joint Venture's experience in large-scale federal projects and specialized engineering will be crucial in navigating these complexities and ensuring the facility meets stringent operational and security standards.

Given the 10+ year duration, what are the primary risks to cost and schedule, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

The primary risks to cost and schedule over a decade-long project include potential design changes, inflation, unforeseen site conditions, and evolving technological requirements. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract clauses for change management, regular performance reviews, contingency planning for unforeseen issues, and potentially phased funding approvals to allow for adjustments based on progress and changing needs.

How will the effectiveness of the design services be measured throughout the contract lifecycle to ensure the final complex meets its intended purpose?

Effectiveness will be measured through key performance indicators (KPIs) tied to design milestones, adherence to specifications, compliance with security and operational requirements, and successful integration of systems. Regular reviews by the Department of the Navy, independent quality assurance checks, and user feedback from the Presidential Airlift Wing will ensure the design ultimately supports the mission-critical functions of the PAR Complex.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICESARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Solicitation ID: N4008016R0152

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5801 BROADWAY EXT.FL 500, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK, 73118

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,135,000

Exercised Options: $21,707,954

Current Obligation: $21,707,954

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2016-11-14

Current End Date: 2027-01-31

Potential End Date: 2027-01-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-10

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending