Department of Defense awards $39.4M construction contract to Clark Design/Build, LLC for facility maintenance

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $39,395,519 ($39.4M)

Contractor: Clark Design/Build, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-06-08

End Date: 2008-05-09

Contract Duration: 1,066 days

Daily Burn Rate: $37.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200512!006072!1700!N40080!NAV FAC ENGINEERING CMD WASHINGT!N4008005C0005 !A!N! !N! !P00001!20050608!20070409!048055557!066767021!064862345!N!CLARK DESIGN/BUILD, LLC !7500 OLD GEORGETOWN RD !BETHESDA !MD!20814!65120!153!51!QUANTICO !PRINCE WILLIAM !VIRGINIA !+000000400000!N!N!000000000000!Y152!MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236210!A!B!3!B!S!D! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!1!014!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!B!Y! !N! !Y!1710!N40080!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $39.4 million to CLARK DESIGN/BUILD, LLC for work described as: 200512!006072!1700!N40080!NAV FAC ENGINEERING CMD WASHINGT!N4008005C0005 !A!N! !N! !P00001!20050608!20070409!048055557!066767021!064862345!N!CLARK DESIGN/BUILD, LLC !7500 OLD GEORGETOWN RD !BETHESDA !MD!20814!65120!153!51!QUANTICO !PRIN… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for building maintenance services, indicating a need for ongoing facility upkeep. 2. The contract was competed using full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. The contractor, Clark Design/Build, LLC, has a track record with federal contracts. 4. The contract duration of approximately 3 years suggests a significant, medium-term project. 5. The primary service category is construction, specifically commercial and institutional building maintenance. 6. The contract was awarded to a single entity, Clark Design/Build, LLC.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $39.4 million for approximately three years of building maintenance services appears to be within a reasonable range for large-scale federal construction projects. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facility maintenance at naval installations would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Without specific details on the scope of work, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing efficiency, but the fixed-price nature of the contract shifts risk to the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data shows 14 bids were received, suggesting a healthy level of competition for this construction project. A higher number of bids generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely drove down prices and ensured the government received competitive offers for the required building maintenance services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Navy, which will receive facility maintenance services. Services delivered include maintenance for buildings at Quantico, Virginia. The geographic impact is localized to Quantico, Virginia, specifically Prince William County. The contract supports the construction and maintenance workforce, likely employing skilled tradespeople.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if the fixed-price contract does not adequately account for unforeseen maintenance issues.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facility maintenance could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Scope creep could lead to increased costs if not managed tightly within the contract terms.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
The fixed-price contract structure incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
The contractor, Clark Design/Build, LLC, has prior experience with federal contracts.
The contract is for essential facility maintenance, ensuring operational readiness.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically focusing on maintenance. The federal government is a significant consumer of construction and maintenance services. Comparable spending benchmarks for facility maintenance at military installations would be necessary for a precise comparison, but the scale of this contract suggests it is a substantial project within its niche.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the contractor, Clark Design/Build, LLC, is likely a larger entity. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this data, which could represent missed opportunities for the small business ecosystem. Further investigation into subcontracting requirements would be needed.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and facilities management divisions. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract terms, with penalties for non-performance. Transparency is facilitated by contract databases like FPDS, though detailed performance reports are not always publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Naval Facilities Engineering Command contracts
Department of Defense construction contracts
Federal building maintenance services
Fixed-price construction contracts

Risk Flags

Contract duration exceeds 2 years
Contract value exceeds $10 million
Contract awarded to a single entity
Contract type is Fixed Price

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $39.4 million to CLARK DESIGN/BUILD, LLC. 200512!006072!1700!N40080!NAV FAC ENGINEERING CMD WASHINGT!N4008005C0005 !A!N! !N! !P00001!20050608!20070409!048055557!066767021!064862345!N!CLARK DESIGN/BUILD, LLC !7500 OLD GEORGETOWN RD !BETHESDA !MD!20814!65120!153!51!QUANTICO !PRINCE WILLIAM !VIRGINIA !+000000400000!N!N!000000000000!Y152!MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236210!A!B!3!B!S!D! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CLARK DESIGN/BUILD, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $39.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-06-08. End: 2008-05-09.

What is the track record of Clark Design/Build, LLC with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

Clark Design/Build, LLC has a history of securing federal contracts, including those with the Department of Defense. While the provided data for this specific contract (N4008005C0005) shows a value of $39.4 million awarded in 2005, a comprehensive review of their federal contracting history would involve examining other awards, performance ratings, and any past issues or disputes. Their experience with similar construction and maintenance projects for government facilities is a key indicator of their capability to fulfill the requirements of this contract. Further analysis would involve cross-referencing their performance on other contracts to assess consistency and reliability.

How does the awarded amount of $39.4 million compare to similar building maintenance contracts for naval installations?

The $39.4 million contract value for approximately three years of building maintenance at Quantico, VA, needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts to assess value for money. Factors such as the size and type of facilities, the scope of maintenance services (preventive, corrective, emergency), and the specific geographic location influence costs. Without access to a database of comparable naval installation maintenance contracts, a precise comparison is difficult. However, for large-scale federal construction and maintenance projects, this figure suggests a significant undertaking. A detailed comparison would require analyzing contracts with similar durations, service scopes, and agency-specific requirements.

What are the primary risks associated with this fixed-price construction contract for facility maintenance?

The primary risks associated with this fixed-price contract revolve around potential cost overruns for the contractor and the government's ability to ensure adequate service delivery. For the contractor, unforeseen issues during maintenance or construction could erode profit margins if not adequately accounted for in the initial bid. For the government, the risk lies in the contractor potentially cutting corners to maintain profitability, leading to subpar maintenance quality. Scope creep, where the government requests additional work beyond the original contract scope without proper modification and pricing, also poses a risk. Effective contract management and oversight are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives the intended value.

How effective is full and open competition in ensuring competitive pricing for construction contracts of this nature?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring competitive pricing for federal construction contracts. By allowing all responsible sources to bid, the government maximizes the pool of potential offerors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive bids. In this case, with 14 bids received for the $39.4 million contract, the level of competition suggests that market forces were likely at play, driving prices down. While it doesn't guarantee the absolute lowest price, it significantly increases the probability that the awarded price reflects a fair market value compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.

What is the historical spending pattern for building maintenance at Quantico, Virginia, or similar naval facilities?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for building maintenance at Quantico, Virginia, or similar naval facilities is crucial for contextualizing the $39.4 million award. This involves examining previous contracts for facility maintenance at this installation or comparable ones, noting their values, durations, and scopes of work. Significant year-over-year increases or decreases in spending could indicate changes in facility needs, budget allocations, or contracting strategies. Understanding these patterns helps assess whether the current contract represents a typical investment, an escalation due to increased needs, or a potential anomaly. Without specific historical data for Quantico's maintenance budgets and contracts, a precise analysis is not possible from the provided data alone.

What are the implications of this contract being awarded to a single entity, Clark Design/Build, LLC?

Awarding this $39.4 million building maintenance contract to a single entity, Clark Design/Build, LLC, means the Department of the Navy is consolidating these services under one provider for the contract's duration. This can lead to efficiencies through a unified point of contact and potentially streamlined operations. However, it also concentrates risk; if Clark Design/Build, LLC underperforms or faces financial difficulties, the Navy's facility maintenance could be significantly disrupted. The success of this approach hinges on the contractor's capability and the effectiveness of the government's oversight to ensure consistent service delivery and adherence to contract terms.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Clark Enterprises, Inc. (UEI: 064862345)

Address: 7500 OLD GEORGETOWN RD, BETHESDA, MD, 20814

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $35,128

Exercised Options: $35,128

Current Obligation: $39,395,519

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline