DoD awards $15.7M for critical power services to MIQUIN, L.L.C. over 3 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,700,000 ($15.7M)

Contractor: Miquin, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-09-21

End Date: 2026-09-19

Contract Duration: 1,094 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CRITICAL POWER SERVICES - 60 MOS.

Place of Performance

Location: KATY, HARRIS County, TEXAS, 77450

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.7 million to MIQUIN, L.L.C. for work described as: CRITICAL POWER SERVICES - 60 MOS. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and scope of critical power services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. No specific risk indicators are immediately apparent from the provided data. 4. Performance context is limited to the provision of critical power services. 5. This contract falls within the Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors sector. 6. The contract is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $15.7 million over approximately three years for critical power services seems within a reasonable range for a Department of Defense contract of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for electrical infrastructure and power maintenance for federal facilities would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor assumes the risk for cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator of value if the price is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the initial solicitation may have had some exclusions, the final award was made through a broad competitive process. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies a robust competition, which is beneficial for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through multiple bids, leading to a more favorable price for the government.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from reliable critical power infrastructure. Services delivered include the maintenance and installation of essential power systems. The geographic impact is primarily within Texas, where the contractor is based. Workforce implications include potential employment opportunities for electricians and technicians in Texas.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Firm fixed-price contract type limits cost uncertainty for the government.
Contractor MIQUIN, L.L.C. is based in Texas, potentially supporting local employment.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors industry (NAICS code 238210). This sector is crucial for maintaining and upgrading the electrical infrastructure of federal facilities, including critical power systems essential for operational continuity. The market size for federal electrical contracting is substantial, with significant spending allocated annually to ensure the reliable functioning of military bases, government buildings, and other sensitive installations. This contract represents a portion of that broader spending aimed at securing vital power services.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific benefits for the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside. The primary contractor, MIQUIN, L.L.C., is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data, so its size status would require further investigation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Navy program office. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, requiring MIQUIN, L.L.C. to deliver the specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
Naval Base Infrastructure Support
Federal Electrical Contracting
Critical Infrastructure Protection

Risk Flags

Contract awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' requires scrutiny of justification for exclusions.
Delivery Order nature means underlying contract terms and competition level need further investigation.
Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data hinders full value assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.7 million to MIQUIN, L.L.C.. CRITICAL POWER SERVICES - 60 MOS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MIQUIN, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-09-21. End: 2026-09-19.

What is the track record of MIQUIN, L.L.C. in performing similar critical power services for the federal government?

Information regarding MIQUIN, L.L.C.'s specific track record for critical power services is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on previous federal contracts. Understanding their experience with similar scopes of work, contract values, and agency requirements is crucial for evaluating their capability to successfully execute this current award. Further research into their contract awards and performance reviews would be necessary to establish a detailed track record.

How does the awarded price of $15.7 million compare to market rates for similar critical power services?

The awarded price of $15.7 million for approximately three years of critical power services needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts. Without specific details on the scope of services (e.g., installation, maintenance, generator types, uptime guarantees), a precise comparison is difficult. However, the firm fixed-price nature suggests a competitive bid process. To assess value, one would compare this contract's per-year cost and service level agreements to similar contracts awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies for facilities of comparable size and criticality in similar geographic regions. Industry benchmarks for electrical contracting services would also provide context.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract are likely related to service delivery, potential cost overruns (though mitigated by the firm fixed-price structure), and ensuring the reliability of critical power systems. Mitigation strategies would include robust contract oversight by the Department of the Navy, clear performance standards and deliverables outlined in the contract, and the contractor's own internal quality control processes. The firm fixed-price nature shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. Ensuring the contractor has adequate resources and expertise to maintain critical power systems without interruption is also a key consideration.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' process in ensuring competitive pricing for this contract?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' process aims to maximize competition while allowing for specific exclusions if justified. This approach generally leads to competitive pricing because it opens the bidding to a wide range of qualified vendors. The 'exclusion of sources' aspect suggests that certain potential bidders were not considered, which could theoretically limit competition. However, if the remaining pool of bidders is substantial and qualified, the process can still yield competitive prices. The effectiveness hinges on the justification for exclusions and the number of responsive bids received from the eligible pool.

What is the historical spending pattern for critical power services by the Department of the Navy in Texas?

Historical spending data for critical power services by the Department of the Navy in Texas is not provided in the current dataset. To analyze this, one would need to access federal procurement databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) and filter for contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy to vendors in Texas for services related to electrical contractors, power systems, and infrastructure maintenance over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the number of contractors utilized, providing context for the current $15.7 million award.

What are the implications of this contract being a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle?

This contract being a delivery order (aw: DELIVERY ORDER) signifies that it is a task order issued against a pre-existing indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) or other type of multiple-award contract. This implies that the foundational contract terms, conditions, and potentially pricing structures were established previously through a separate, likely competitive, procurement. Delivery orders allow agencies to procure specific goods or services as needed, offering flexibility. The implications include that the competition for this specific $15.7 million award might have been limited to pre-qualified vendors on the parent contract, and the overall value of the parent contract could be significantly larger than this single delivery order.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Building Equipment Contractors › Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors

Product/Service Code: INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT › INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N3943020R2230

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 21811 KATY FWY STE D105, KATY, TX, 77450

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,700,000

Exercised Options: $15,700,000

Current Obligation: $15,700,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N3943021D2204

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline