KBR Services awarded $4.9M for NSA BOSC FUNDING TASK ORDER FOR OPTION 8, extending facilities support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,939,005 ($4.9M)
Contractor: KBR Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-11-29
End Date: 2026-11-30
Contract Duration: 366 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NSA BOSC FUNDING TASK ORDER FOR OPTION 8
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $4.9 million to KBR SERVICES, LLC for work described as: NSA BOSC FUNDING TASK ORDER FOR OPTION 8 Key points: 1. Contract value represents a moderate investment in ongoing facilities support services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding environment. 3. Fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty for the government. 4. Contract duration of one year indicates a defined period for service delivery. 5. The award falls within the facilities support services sector, a common government need. 6. The task order is part of a larger contract vehicle, implying potential for future work.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $4.9 million for a one-year period appears reasonable for facilities support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for large-scale facilities management and support within the Department of Defense would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, given the nature of the services, the price seems aligned with industry standards for comprehensive support.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The agency sought proposals from a wide range of qualified contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a robust bidding process and encourages a wider pool of contractors to offer their best pricing.
Public Impact
The National Security Agency (NSA) benefits from continued facilities support services, ensuring operational readiness. Facilities support services are delivered, likely encompassing maintenance, operations, and potentially other base support functions. The geographic impact is likely concentrated at NSA facilities where these services are required. Workforce implications may include the employment of personnel by KBR Services, LLC to perform the contracted tasks.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess service quality.
- The duration of one year may require frequent re-competition, potentially leading to administrative overhead.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a fair and competitive process.
- Fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability for the government.
- KBR Services, LLC is an established contractor, potentially bringing experience and efficiency.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector (NAICS code 561210), which is a significant segment of the government contracting market. This sector includes a wide range of services essential for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. Spending in this area is consistent across many federal agencies, supporting everything from administrative buildings to specialized operational sites. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing the total federal expenditure on facilities support services annually.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. However, KBR Services, LLC, as a large business, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, depending on their internal subcontracting plans and the specific requirements of the task order.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration team within the Department of the Navy. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and invoice review are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Maintenance Services
- Base Operations Support
- Government Facilities Management
- NSA Support Contracts
- Department of Defense Facilities
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance issues if service levels are not maintained.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics in award data.
- Fixed-price contract may not fully account for unforeseen cost escalations.
Tags
facilities-support, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, national-security-agency, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, facilities-management, kbr-services-llc, option-year
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $4.9 million to KBR SERVICES, LLC. NSA BOSC FUNDING TASK ORDER FOR OPTION 8
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KBR SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-11-29. End: 2026-11-30.
What is the historical spending trend for KBR Services, LLC with the Department of the Navy for facilities support services?
Analyzing KBR Services, LLC's historical spending with the Department of the Navy for facilities support services requires access to detailed contract databases. Generally, large defense contractors like KBR have a long-standing relationship with various military branches, including the Navy. Their spending patterns often reflect the agency's evolving needs for base operations, maintenance, and specialized support. A review of past awards would reveal the volume and types of facilities support contracts awarded to KBR, indicating their established presence and capabilities within this sector for the Navy. This specific task order, valued at $4.9 million over one year, represents a portion of that ongoing relationship, suggesting continued reliance on their services for specific NSA requirements.
How does the per-unit cost of services under this contract compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy?
Determining the precise per-unit cost comparison for this contract is challenging without detailed service breakdowns and metrics. The provided data does not specify the exact services rendered or their associated quantities, making direct per-unit cost analysis difficult. However, the overall contract value of $4.9 million for a 366-day duration suggests a substantial scope of work. To benchmark, one would need to identify comparable contracts for facilities support services awarded by the Department of the Navy, focusing on contracts with similar scope, duration, and service complexity. Factors such as labor rates, overhead, and profit margins would be key comparison points. The fixed-price nature of this contract implies that KBR Services, LLC has already factored these costs into their bid.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate KBR Services, LLC's performance on this task order?
The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this task order are not detailed in the provided award data. However, for facilities support services contracts, typical KPIs often include response times for maintenance requests, uptime percentages for critical systems, adherence to safety protocols, customer satisfaction ratings, and completion of scheduled preventive maintenance. The contracting officer's representative (COR) and the contract administration team would be responsible for monitoring KBR's performance against these, or similar, established metrics. Performance evaluations are crucial for ensuring the government receives the expected value and quality of services, and they inform future contract decisions.
What is the risk profile associated with KBR Services, LLC as a contractor for this type of service?
KBR Services, LLC is a large, established government contractor with extensive experience in providing facilities support and base operations services across various defense and civilian agencies. The risk profile for this specific task order is generally considered low to moderate. The primary risks might include potential performance issues if service levels are not maintained, or unforeseen cost increases if the fixed-price contract does not adequately account for all variables. However, KBR's track record suggests a capacity to manage these risks effectively. The full and open competition also mitigates some risk by ensuring a competitive selection process. The contract's duration of one year limits the long-term exposure to any single performance period.
How does this contract align with the Department of the Navy's broader strategy for facilities management and modernization?
This task order for NSA BOSC FUNDING TASK ORDER FOR OPTION 8 aligns with the Department of the Navy's ongoing need to maintain and operate its facilities effectively. While this specific award focuses on existing support services, it contributes to the overall operational readiness of NSA installations. The Navy's broader strategy often involves balancing the need for reliable day-to-day facilities management with long-term modernization and infrastructure upgrades. Contracts like this ensure that essential services are continuously provided, freeing up agency resources to focus on strategic initiatives. The decision to award this task order under full and open competition suggests the Navy is seeking efficient and cost-effective solutions for its facility needs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Brown & Root Industrial Services Holdings, LLC
Address: 1080 ELDRIDGE PKWY, HOUSTON, TX, 77077
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,939,005
Exercised Options: $4,939,005
Current Obligation: $4,939,005
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6247017D4007
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-11-29
Current End Date: 2026-11-30
Potential End Date: 2026-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-11
More Contracts from KBR Services, LLC
- Follow on Task Order to 139 IS NOW Task Order 159 — $8.9B (Department of Defense)
- 200612!001884!2100!w52p1j!u.s. Army Industrial Operations !daaa0902d0007 !A!N! !Y!0139 ! !20060822!20120131!133469119!133469119!964409007!n!kellogg Brown&root Services,!4100 Clinton DRY !houston !TX!77020!00000! !IZ! ! !iraq !+000400000000!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !561210!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!r!2!003!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $7.9B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $6.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200509!001151!2100!w52p1j!u.s. Army Industrial Operations !daaa0902d0007 !A!N! !Y!0089 ! !20050613!20120131!133469119!133469119!964409007!n!kellogg Brown&root Services,!4100 Clinton DR !houston !TX!77020!00000! !IZ!* !* !iraq !+000135000000!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !S1 !services !000 !* !561210!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!u!r!2!003!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! !Y! ! ! !0001! ! — $4.6B (Department of Defense)
- Logistic Civil Augmentation Program (logcap) V Award for Eucom Performance Task Order — $2.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)