KBR Services awarded $23.9M for NSA BOSC Option Year 7, continuing facilities support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,886,840 ($23.9M)
Contractor: KBR Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-12-01
End Date: 2025-11-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $65.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NSA BOSC OPTION YEAR 7 RECURRING WORK
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $23.9 million to KBR SERVICES, LLC for work described as: NSA BOSC OPTION YEAR 7 RECURRING WORK Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in ongoing facilities support services. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs for recurring work. 3. Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process. 4. This contract is an option year, indicating a continuation of established services. 5. The duration of nearly one year provides a stable period for service delivery. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 points to facilities support services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $23.9 million for one year of facilities support services appears reasonable given the scope of recurring work for the National Security Agency (NSA). Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities support contracts for government entities suggests that this pricing is within expected ranges. The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type provides cost certainty for the government, which is a positive indicator of value for money, assuming the contractor can efficiently manage their operations to maintain profitability.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation suggests a competitive environment that should drive price discovery and potentially lead to more favorable terms for the government. The use of full and open competition is generally preferred as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors and promotes a fair and transparent procurement process.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for this contract helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces. It signals that the government sought the best value available, rather than being limited to a single provider.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the personnel and operations of the National Security Agency (NSA) who rely on these facilities support services. Services delivered include a range of facilities maintenance, operations, and support functions essential for the secure functioning of NSA facilities. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around the specific NSA facilities being supported. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for individuals in facilities management, maintenance, and related support roles, primarily through KBR Services, LLC and its potential subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on the number of bidders in the full and open competition limits a deeper assessment of competitive intensity.
- The provided data does not include performance metrics from previous option years, making it difficult to assess contractor performance trends.
- Information regarding potential subcontracting to small businesses is not detailed, which could impact the small business ecosystem.
Positive Signals
- The contract is awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a healthy market for these services.
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- This is an option year award, indicating a continuation of services, which implies a level of satisfaction with the incumbent provider's performance.
- The contract duration of nearly one year provides stability for service delivery and planning.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector encompasses a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government and commercial facilities. The market for government facilities support is substantial, driven by the extensive real estate holdings of federal agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale facilities support contracts awarded by agencies like the Department of Defense, General Services Administration, and other departments with significant infrastructure needs.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false for this contract, and there is no specific small business set-aside (st) mentioned. This suggests that the primary award was not targeted towards small businesses. However, it is possible that KBR Services, LLC, as the prime contractor, may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill certain aspects of the contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business subcontracting and its impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Navy. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which places the onus on the contractor to deliver services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though specific performance details may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- NSA Facilities Operations and Maintenance
- Department of Defense Base Operations Support
- Federal Facilities Management Services
- Government IT Infrastructure Support (indirectly related)
- Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for service disruption
- Contractor performance below expectations
- Cybersecurity risks in facility management systems
Tags
facilities-support, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, national-security-agency, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, recurring-work, option-year, kbr-services-llc, facilities-management, base-operations-support
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $23.9 million to KBR SERVICES, LLC. NSA BOSC OPTION YEAR 7 RECURRING WORK
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KBR SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-12-01. End: 2025-11-30.
What is the historical spending trend for NSA BOSC facilities support services over the past five years?
Analyzing historical spending for NSA BOSC facilities support services requires access to detailed contract databases beyond the single award provided. Typically, recurring work contracts like this option year are part of a larger, multi-year contract vehicle. To understand the trend, one would need to aggregate all awards related to NSA BOSC facilities support, including base years and subsequent option periods, for the past five fiscal years. This would reveal whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and identify any significant fluctuations. Factors influencing trends could include changes in facility requirements, budget allocations, or shifts in service scope. Without this aggregated data, it's impossible to provide a precise historical spending trend.
How does the per-unit cost of services under this contract compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy?
A direct per-unit cost comparison is challenging without detailed breakdowns of the services provided and their associated units (e.g., cost per square foot maintained, cost per service call). However, the overall contract value of approximately $23.9 million for a year of comprehensive facilities support for NSA operations suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking against other large-scale facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy for similar types of installations (e.g., secure government facilities) would be necessary. If comparable contracts show significantly lower or higher total values for similar scopes of work, it could indicate potential overpricing or exceptional value. The firm-fixed-price nature of this contract provides a degree of cost control, but the efficiency of the contractor in delivering these services at this price point is key to assessing value.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate KBR Services, LLC's performance on this contract?
While the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this NSA BOSC Option Year 7 contract are not detailed in the provided data, government facilities support contracts typically include a range of metrics. These often encompass service response times, facility uptime percentages, maintenance completion rates, safety incident rates, and customer satisfaction scores. Performance is usually evaluated against a Performance Work Statement (PWS) that outlines the required services and standards. For a contract of this nature, KPIs would likely focus on ensuring the operational readiness and security of critical NSA facilities. Regular performance reviews between the government contracting officer's representative (COR) and KBR Services, LLC would assess adherence to these KPIs, with potential implications for future contract renewals or award fee determinations.
What is the risk profile associated with KBR Services, LLC as a contractor for this type of sensitive government facility support?
KBR Services, LLC is a large, established government contractor with extensive experience in providing base operations and facilities support services. The risk profile for this specific contract is generally considered moderate to low, given the contractor's track record and the nature of the services. Key risks could include potential disruptions to service delivery due to unforeseen events, contractor performance issues not meeting stringent government standards, or cybersecurity vulnerabilities if IT systems are involved in facility management. However, the firm-fixed-price structure and the option year award suggest a level of confidence from the Department of the Navy. Robust oversight mechanisms and clear performance expectations are crucial for mitigating any residual risks associated with supporting sensitive national security facilities.
Are there any known issues or controversies related to KBR Services, LLC's past performance on similar facilities support contracts?
Assessing KBR Services, LLC's past performance requires a comprehensive review of contract databases, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any publicly available information regarding disputes or litigation. KBR has a long history of government contracting, and like any large entity, may have faced performance challenges on specific contracts over time. However, the fact that this is an option year award for NSA BOSC suggests that their performance on previous periods was deemed satisfactory by the Department of the Navy. Without specific data on past issues directly related to this particular service type or facility, it's difficult to pinpoint significant controversies that would inherently de-risk this current contract. A deeper dive into CPARS data would provide more granular insights.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N6247015R4006
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Brown & Root Industrial Services Holdings, LLC
Address: 1080 ELDRIDGE PKWY, HOUSTON, TX, 77077
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,886,840
Exercised Options: $23,886,840
Current Obligation: $23,886,840
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 13
Total Subaward Amount: $2,745,671
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6247017D4007
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-12-01
Current End Date: 2025-11-30
Potential End Date: 2025-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-30
More Contracts from KBR Services, LLC
- Follow on Task Order to 139 IS NOW Task Order 159 — $8.9B (Department of Defense)
- 200612!001884!2100!w52p1j!u.s. Army Industrial Operations !daaa0902d0007 !A!N! !Y!0139 ! !20060822!20120131!133469119!133469119!964409007!n!kellogg Brown&root Services,!4100 Clinton DRY !houston !TX!77020!00000! !IZ! ! !iraq !+000400000000!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !561210!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!r!2!003!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $7.9B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $6.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200509!001151!2100!w52p1j!u.s. Army Industrial Operations !daaa0902d0007 !A!N! !Y!0089 ! !20050613!20120131!133469119!133469119!964409007!n!kellogg Brown&root Services,!4100 Clinton DR !houston !TX!77020!00000! !IZ!* !* !iraq !+000135000000!n!n!000000000000!r706!logistics Support Services !S1 !services !000 !* !561210!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!u!r!2!003!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! !Y! ! ! !0001! ! — $4.6B (Department of Defense)
- Logistic Civil Augmentation Program (logcap) V Award for Eucom Performance Task Order — $2.2B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)