Hawaii MESS ATTENDANT SERVICES contract awarded to Department of Human Services Hawaii for over $7.2M
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $7,221,033 ($7.2M)
Contractor: Department of Human Services Hawaii
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2020-10-06
End Date: 2026-04-05
Contract Duration: 2,007 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.6K/day
Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: MESS ATTENDANT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: JBPHH, HONOLULU County, HAWAII, 96860
State: Hawaii Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $7.2 million to DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HAWAII for work described as: MESS ATTENDANT SERVICES Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the 6-year duration and fixed-price nature. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a competed contract, suggesting potential for price discovery. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a long performance period requiring ongoing oversight. 4. Performance context is within food services, a common government support function. 5. Sector positioning is in government support services, not a high-tech or defense-specific area.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $7.2M over approximately 6 years suggests an average annual spend of $1.2M. Benchmarking this against similar mess attendant services contracts is difficult without more specific service details and geographic comparisons. However, the firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government. The awarded amount of $3,598 for the base period seems reasonable for initial setup or a small portion of the overall service.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), suggesting it was likely a competitive process among eligible vendors. With 4 bidders, there was a reasonable level of competition for this contract. This indicates that multiple firms were interested and capable of providing the required services, which generally leads to better price discovery and value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: A competed contract under SAP with multiple bidders helps ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the personnel at the Department of Defense facilities in Hawaii who will receive mess attendant services. The services delivered include support for food service operations, ensuring efficient and clean dining facilities. The geographic impact is localized to Hawaii, supporting military and potentially other government personnel stationed there. Workforce implications include the creation or maintenance of jobs for mess attendants and supervisors within the contractor's organization.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (over 6 years) increases the risk of cost escalation or service degradation if not managed proactively.
- Reliance on a single award for a significant service requirement could pose a risk if the contractor underperforms or faces financial difficulties.
Positive Signals
- The contract was competed, indicating a healthy market interest and potential for competitive pricing.
- The firm fixed-price contract type locks in costs, providing budget certainty for the government.
- Multiple bidders participated, suggesting a robust competitive landscape for these services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the government support services sector, specifically focusing on food service operations. The market for such services is generally stable and characterized by numerous providers, ranging from small businesses to large corporations. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific volume and type of mess attendant services required, but government contracts for food service support are common across various agencies.
Small Business Impact
Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans was not explicitly provided in the data. However, given the contract was competed under SAP, it's possible that small businesses were among the bidders or could participate in subcontracting opportunities if the prime contractor is a larger entity. Further analysis would be needed to determine the specific impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the requiring activity within the Department of the Navy. Performance monitoring, quality assurance checks, and invoice reviews are standard accountability measures. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports are often internal.
Related Government Programs
- Mess Attendant Services
- Food Service Contracts
- Department of Defense Support Services
- Government Food Operations
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration
- Potential for cost escalation over time
- Need for consistent performance monitoring
Tags
mess-attendant-services, food-service, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, hawaii, purchase-order, competed, firm-fixed-price, government-support, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $7.2 million to DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HAWAII. MESS ATTENDANT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES HAWAII.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $7.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-10-06. End: 2026-04-05.
What is the historical spending pattern for MESS ATTENDANT SERVICES by the Department of the Navy in Hawaii?
Historical spending data for MESS ATTENDANT SERVICES by the Department of the Navy specifically in Hawaii is not directly available from the provided data snippet. However, the current contract awarded on 2020-10-06 for $7,221,032.55 with an end date of 2026-04-05 indicates a significant and ongoing requirement for these services. To understand historical patterns, one would need to access historical contract databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) and filter by agency (Department of the Navy), geographic location (Hawaii), and the relevant Product Service Code (PSC) or Federal Supply Group (FSG) for food services. This would reveal previous contract awards, their values, durations, and awarded contractors, allowing for an analysis of spending trends, potential increases or decreases in contract values over time, and the stability of the service requirement.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar mess attendant services?
Directly comparing the awarded price of $7,221,032.55 over approximately six years to market rates for similar mess attendant services is challenging without detailed service level agreements, labor rates, and geographic cost-of-living adjustments specific to Hawaii. The contract is firm fixed-price, which provides cost certainty but may not always reflect the absolute lowest market price if market conditions fluctuate significantly. The initial award amount of $3,598 for the base period is likely a small initial task order or administrative cost. A comprehensive market rate analysis would involve researching commercial contracts for similar services in the region, considering factors like the number of personnel served, operating hours, specific duties (cleaning, serving, setup), and required qualifications. Given the competitive bidding process, it's reasonable to assume the price is within a competitive range for the specified services and location.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract and how is performance monitored?
The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this MESS ATTENDANT SERVICES contract. However, typical KPIs for such services often include timeliness of service, cleanliness of facilities, food safety compliance, customer satisfaction (from personnel using the mess hall), and adherence to schedules. Performance monitoring is usually conducted by a Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) or a Technical Monitor within the Department of the Navy. This involves regular inspections, review of service logs, and potentially soliciting feedback from end-users. Contractual remedies, such as service level credits or termination for default, exist if performance consistently falls below the required standards.
What is the contractor's track record with the Department of the Navy or similar government agencies?
The provided data does not include information on the specific contractor awarded this MESS ATTENDANT SERVICES contract, nor their track record. To assess the contractor's performance history, one would need to identify the awardee (e.g., through a search on SAM.gov or FPDS using the contract number or award details) and then review their past performance evaluations, any past performance questionnaires submitted by previous government clients, and check for any records of contract disputes, claims, or terminations. A positive track record with the Department of the Navy or other federal agencies for similar food service or facility support contracts would indicate a lower performance risk for this current award.
Are there any identified risks associated with the long duration of this contract (over 6 years)?
Yes, the long duration of this contract, spanning over six years (from October 6, 2020, to April 5, 2026, totaling 2007 days or approximately 5.5 years), presents several potential risks. Firstly, there's the risk of cost escalation if the firm fixed-price contract doesn't adequately account for inflation or unforeseen increases in labor and material costs over such an extended period. Secondly, contractor performance can degrade over time if oversight is not consistently rigorous; complacency can set in. Thirdly, technological advancements or changes in service requirements might occur, making the contracted services less efficient or outdated by the end of the term. Finally, a long-term reliance on a single contractor increases the risk associated with potential contractor instability (financial issues, key personnel loss) or underperformance, as switching providers mid-contract can be disruptive and costly.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Accommodation and Food Services › Special Food Services › Food Service Contractors
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Solicitation ID: N0060420Q4005
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1901 BACHELOT ST, HONOLULU, HI, 96817
Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business, U.S. Regional/State Government
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $7,221,033
Exercised Options: $7,221,033
Current Obligation: $7,221,033
Actual Outlays: $2,736,207
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-10-06
Current End Date: 2026-04-05
Potential End Date: 2026-04-05 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-30
More Contracts from Department of Human Services Hawaii
- Mess Attendant Services — $16.8M (Department of Defense)
View all Department of Human Services Hawaii federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)