DoD Awards $33.5M Engineering Services Contract to Booz Allen Hamilton for Naval Air Warfare Center

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $33,495,643 ($33.5M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-10-01

End Date: 2011-11-30

Contract Duration: 2,251 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200601!093242!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0042106C0002 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051001!20060930!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!69525!037!24!ST. INIGOES !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !+000000686500!N!N!000027790883!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!U!2!001!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y!1700!N00421!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $33.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: 200601!093242!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0042106C0002 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051001!20060930!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!69525!037!24!ST. INIGOES !ST. … Key points: 1. The contract is for engineering and technical services, a common need within the defense sector. 2. Booz Allen Hamilton, a large established contractor, secured this award. 3. The contract's duration of over 6 years suggests a significant, ongoing requirement. 4. The use of 'full and open competition' is a positive indicator for price discovery.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $33.5 million over approximately 6 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific task orders or comparable contract data, a precise pricing assessment is difficult, but it appears reasonable for specialized engineering services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value offer.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is intended to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing services at a fair market price.

Public Impact

Supports critical naval aviation research and development efforts. Ensures continued technical expertise for the Naval Air Warfare Center. Potential for follow-on contracts based on performance. Booz Allen Hamilton's involvement suggests a focus on advanced technical solutions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contract duration exceeds 6 years, potentially locking in costs.
Specific details on task order pricing are not readily available.
Reliance on a single large contractor for extended periods.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Booz Allen Hamilton is a reputable contractor with relevant expertise.
Services support a critical defense function.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically engineering services. Defense spending in this area is substantial, supporting military readiness and technological advancement. Benchmarks for similar engineering services contracts vary widely based on scope and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses. The award to a large, established contractor like Booz Allen Hamilton suggests that small business participation may have been through subcontracting, if at all.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Naval Air Warfare Center, implying internal oversight. The use of 'full and open competition' suggests a structured procurement process. Further oversight details would require examination of specific contract clauses and performance monitoring reports.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration (over 6 years).
Cost-plus-fixed-fee pricing structure.
Lack of detailed task order information.
Potential for scope creep over the contract's life.
Limited visibility into small business participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $33.5 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. 200601!093242!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0042106C0002 !A!N! !Y! ! !20051001!20060930!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!69525!037!24!ST. INIGOES !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !+000000686500!N!N!000027790883!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $33.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-01. End: 2011-11-30.

What specific engineering and technical services are included in this contract, and how do they align with current naval aviation priorities?

The contract specifies 'ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES' but lacks granular detail on specific tasks. These services likely encompass areas such as systems engineering, software development, testing, and analysis crucial for naval aviation platforms. Alignment with current priorities would depend on the specific modernization and operational needs of the Navy's air assets during the contract period.

How does the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure impact the government's risk and the contractor's incentive for cost control?

A Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) contract allows the contractor to recover all allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. This structure shifts cost risk more towards the government, as the final price is not fixed upfront. However, the fixed fee incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently to maximize their profit margin within that predetermined fee.

What is the government's strategy for ensuring continued innovation and avoiding vendor lock-in given the long contract duration?

The government's strategy likely involves performance-based requirements and potentially periodic reviews or re-competition points within the contract's lifecycle. While the duration is long, the initial 'full and open competition' suggests an effort to secure competitive pricing. Future strategies might include market research for alternative solutions or incorporating incentives for contractor innovation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $702,434

Exercised Options: $702,434

Current Obligation: $33,495,643

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline