Raytheon Awarded $794.6M for Guided Missile Launchers, Facing Limited Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,193,375 ($27.2M)

Contractor: Raytheon Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-04-20

End Date: 2009-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,624 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200507!207544!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0042105C0048 !A!N! !N! ! !20050420!20070501!794598573!794598573!001339159!N!RAYTHEON COMPANY !1151 E HERMANS RD !TUCSON !AZ!85706!77000!019!04!TUCSON !PIMA !ARIZONA !+000006100000!N!N!000006100000!1440!LAUNCHERS, GUIDED MISSILE !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !549 !F/A-18 E/F !336419!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !D!U!J!1!001!N!1A!A!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!B!Y! ! ! !Y!1719!N00019!0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: TUCSON, PIMA County, ARIZONA, 85756

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $27.2 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: 200507!207544!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0042105C0048 !A!N! !N! ! !20050420!20070501!794598573!794598573!001339159!N!RAYTHEON COMPANY !1151 E HERMANS RD !TUCSON !AZ!85706!77000!019!04!TUCSON !PIMA… Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $794.6 million for missile launchers. 2. Limited competition raises questions about price discovery and value. 3. Potential risk associated with sole-source or limited competition procurements. 4. Defense sector spending on advanced missile systems continues.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $794.6 million for guided missile launchers appears substantial. Without more data on unit costs and performance metrics, it's difficult to definitively assess value. However, the limited competition raises concerns about whether taxpayers received the best possible price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not competed, indicating a limited competition approach. This method can sometimes lead to higher prices due to reduced market pressure and potentially less rigorous price negotiation compared to full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of robust competition may result in taxpayers paying a premium for these critical defense components.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to limited competition on this defense contract. The acquisition of advanced missile components is crucial for national security. Raytheon Company, a major defense contractor, benefits from this award.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited competition
  • Lack of price benchmark data
  • Potential for cost overruns

Positive Signals

  • Critical defense system procurement
  • Award to established defense contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the defense sector, specifically focusing on electronics and communication equipment for military aircraft. Spending in this area is driven by modernization efforts and the need for advanced weaponry, with benchmarks often tied to specific weapon system costs.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication in the provided data that small businesses were involved in this specific contract award. The prime contractor, Raytheon Company, is a large aerospace and defense firm.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Defense's contracting and auditing mechanisms. The limited competition aspect warrants closer scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and performance.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Limited competition
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Lack of transparency in justification for sole-source/limited competition
  • Significant contract value without clear cost benchmarks

Tags

other-guided-missile-and-space-vehicle-p, department-of-defense, az, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $27.2 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. 200507!207544!1700!N00421!NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV!N0042105C0048 !A!N! !N! ! !20050420!20070501!794598573!794598573!001339159!N!RAYTHEON COMPANY !1151 E HERMANS RD !TUCSON !AZ!85706!77000!019!04!TUCSON !PIMA !ARIZONA !+000006100000!N!N!000006100000!1440!LAUNCHERS, GUIDED MISSILE !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !549 !F/A-18 E/F !336419!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-04-20. End: 2009-09-30.

What is the specific unit cost for these guided missile launchers, and how does it compare to similar systems procured through competitive means?

The provided data does not include specific unit cost breakdowns or comparable pricing from competitive contracts. To assess value accurately, a detailed analysis of the unit cost against industry benchmarks and prices from previously competed contracts for similar systems would be necessary. This information is crucial for determining if the $794.6 million award represents a fair market price.

What were the justifications for limiting competition on this significant defense procurement?

The justification for limiting competition is not detailed in the provided data. Typically, such decisions are based on factors like unique technical requirements, urgent needs, or the unavailability of alternative sources. A thorough review of the contracting officer's justification would be needed to understand the rationale and assess its validity.

How does the performance of these guided missile launchers meet the operational requirements of the F/A-18 E/F aircraft, and what is the long-term cost-effectiveness?

The data indicates the launchers are for the F/A-18 E/F, suggesting they meet specific operational needs. However, details on performance metrics and long-term cost-effectiveness, including maintenance and upgrade costs, are not provided. Assessing the true effectiveness and value requires evaluating the system's reliability, upgradeability, and overall contribution to mission success over its lifecycle.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: GUIDED MISSLES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1151 E HERMANS RD, TUCSON, AZ, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-04-20

Current End Date: 2009-09-30

Potential End Date: 2009-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-03-13

More Contracts from Raytheon Company

View all Raytheon Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending