DoD Awards $97.7M Engineering Services Contract to Titan Systems Corp. for Naval Air Warfare Center

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $97,708,937 ($97.7M)

Contractor: Engility LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2001-08-09

End Date: 2006-08-08

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $53.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200111!002926!1700!A8105 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042101C0046 !A!N!*!N! !20010809!20060808!020278375!011147928!048341838!N!TITAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION !815 EAST GATE DRIVE !MOUNT LAUREL !NJ!08054!80960!017!42!WARMINSTER !BUCKS !PENN !+000000424665!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!U!2!001!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $97.7 million to ENGILITY LLC for work described as: 200111!002926!1700!A8105 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042101C0046 !A!N!*!N! !20010809!20060808!020278375!011147928!048341838!N!TITAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION !815 EAST GATE DRIVE !MOUNT LAUREL !NJ!08054!80960!017!42!WARMINSTER !BUCKS… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Titan Systems Corporation for engineering and technical services. 2. Significant contract value of $97.7 million over 5 years. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open', suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. Sector is Defense, specifically supporting Naval Air Warfare Center operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $97.7 million over 1825 days suggests an average annual value of approximately $19.5 million. Without specific unit costs or detailed service breakdowns, a precise pricing assessment is difficult, but it appears substantial for specialized engineering services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition', indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing, though the specific pricing outcomes are not detailed here.

Taxpayer Impact: The substantial value of this contract represents a significant allocation of taxpayer funds towards defense engineering services. The competitive award process aims to ensure value for money.

Public Impact

Supports critical naval aviation research and development through engineering services. Contract duration of 5 years provides long-term stability for the awarded vendor. Potential for follow-on work or similar contracts in the defense sector. Impacts the defense industrial base and specialized engineering workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics or outcome-based pricing.
Limited insight into the specific technical services provided.
Potential for cost overruns in complex engineering projects.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair process.
Long contract duration provides program stability.
Supports a key defense agency's operational needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting defense applications for the Naval Air Warfare Center. Spending in this sector is crucial for national security and technological advancement, with benchmarks varying widely based on project complexity and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the primary awardee is Titan Systems Corporation, a large business. There is no explicit mention of small business participation or subcontracting goals in the provided data, suggesting limited direct impact on small businesses for this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Department of Defense, with oversight from the Defense Contract Management Agency. The 'full and open' competition method implies a structured procurement process, but further details on oversight mechanisms and accountability are not provided.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to cost overruns.
Limited detail on specific services and performance metrics.
No explicit mention of small business subcontracting.
Long contract duration may not adapt well to rapidly changing technology.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $97.7 million to ENGILITY LLC. 200111!002926!1700!A8105 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042101C0046 !A!N!*!N! !20010809!20060808!020278375!011147928!048341838!N!TITAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION !815 EAST GATE DRIVE !MOUNT LAUREL !NJ!08054!80960!017!42!WARMINSTER !BUCKS !PENN !+000000424665!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENGILITY LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $97.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2001-08-09. End: 2006-08-08.

What specific engineering and technical services were included in this contract, and how do they align with the Naval Air Warfare Center's mission?

The contract specifies 'ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES' and falls under the PSC code R425 (Support-Professional: Engineering/Technical). While the exact deliverables are not detailed, these services likely encompass a broad range of support for naval aviation systems, including design, development, testing, and maintenance of electronic and communication systems, crucial for the NAWC's role in advancing naval air warfare capabilities.

Given the 'Cost Plus Fixed Fee' (CPFF) contract type, what are the primary risks associated with cost overruns and how are they mitigated?

CPFF contracts carry inherent risks of cost overruns as the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust government oversight, detailed cost tracking, performance metrics, and clear definition of scope to prevent scope creep. The fixed fee incentivizes efficiency, but the government bears the primary risk of cost increases.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition' method in ensuring optimal value for taxpayer money in specialized defense engineering contracts of this magnitude?

Full and Open Competition is generally considered effective in maximizing value by encouraging a wide range of bidders and fostering price competition. For specialized contracts, its effectiveness depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the ability of diverse firms to compete, and the government's evaluation criteria. While it promotes a competitive landscape, the ultimate value realization hinges on the specific technical requirements and the quality of proposals received.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Engility Corporation (UEI: 783837672)

Address: 11000 COMMERCE PKWY, MOUNT LAUREL, NJ, 08054

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline