DoD Awards $46.4M Engineering Services Contract to Booz Allen Hamilton

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $46,412,640 ($46.4M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2000-07-07

End Date: 2005-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,911 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200010!1700!003609!A8107 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042100C0565 !A!*!* !20000707!20000930!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!17038!BOOZ ALLEN & HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DR !MC LEAN !VA!22102!69525!037!24!ST. INIGOES !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !0001!+000000300000!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8711!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!002!B!* !C!N!Z!* !* !N!C!*!B!B!A!A!A!A!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $46.4 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: 200010!1700!003609!A8107 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042100C0565 !A!*!* !20000707!20000930!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!17038!BOOZ ALLEN & HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DR !MC LEAN !VA!22102!69525!037!24!ST. INIGOES !ST.… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for engineering technical services to Booz Allen Hamilton. 2. Significant contract value of $46.4 million over its duration. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open', suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. Sector is Defense, a major area of federal spending. 5. Contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can carry cost overrun risks.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $46.4 million for engineering technical services appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized engineering support would be necessary to definitively assess its value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition', indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is intended to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best possible price for services.

Public Impact

This contract supports critical defense operations, potentially impacting national security. Booz Allen Hamilton, a large government contractor, will receive significant funding. The 'Cost Plus Fixed Fee' structure requires careful monitoring to control costs. The duration of the contract (over 1900 days) suggests a long-term need for these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
  • Long contract duration may indicate a lack of agile procurement or evolving requirements.
  • Specific details on the 'engineering technical services' are not provided, making it hard to assess true value.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through Full and Open Competition, suggesting a competitive process.
  • Booz Allen Hamilton is a well-established contractor with a track record.
  • Contract supports the Naval Air Warfare Center, a key defense entity.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically supporting naval aviation warfare. Spending in this area is typically high due to the complex and critical nature of military technology and operations.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses. Large, established contractors like Booz Allen Hamilton often dominate these types of high-value contracts.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, which is responsible for overseeing contract performance and compliance. Further oversight would involve program managers within the Naval Air Warfare Center.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure
  • Lack of specific service details
  • Long contract duration
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • No explicit small business participation noted

Tags

department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $46.4 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. 200010!1700!003609!A8107 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER, AIRCRA!N0042100C0565 !A!*!* !20000707!20000930!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!17038!BOOZ ALLEN & HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DR !MC LEAN !VA!22102!69525!037!24!ST. INIGOES !ST. MARY S !MARYLAND !0001!+000000300000!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8711!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $46.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-07-07. End: 2005-09-30.

What specific engineering technical services are being procured, and how do they align with current naval aviation needs?

The specific nature of the 'ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES' is not detailed in the provided data. Understanding the scope, such as research, development, testing, or sustainment support, is crucial for assessing the contract's necessity and value. These services likely support the lifecycle management, modernization, or operational readiness of naval aircraft systems.

What are the potential risks associated with the 'Cost Plus Fixed Fee' contract type for these services?

The 'Cost Plus Fixed Fee' (CPFF) structure carries inherent risks. While the fee is fixed, the government bears the cost of performance. If Booz Allen Hamilton incurs higher-than-expected costs, the government pays them, potentially leading to a higher final price than initially anticipated. Effective oversight is critical to manage cost growth and ensure the fixed fee remains appropriate.

How does the $46.4 million contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar engineering support for naval aviation programs?

Without specific details on the services rendered, direct benchmarking is challenging. However, $46.4 million over approximately five years represents a significant investment. Industry benchmarks for specialized engineering and technical support in the defense sector can range widely, but this figure suggests a substantial, long-term requirement for complex services.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2000-07-07

Current End Date: 2005-09-30

Potential End Date: 2005-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-05-04

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending