DoD Awards $6.8M for Controller Assemblies to Raytheon Company, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,872,572 ($6.9M)

Contractor: Raytheon Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2026-01-06

End Date: 2027-04-16

Contract Duration: 465 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY

Place of Performance

Location: GOLETA, SANTA BARBARA County, CALIFORNIA, 93117

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $6.9 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $6.87 million for specialized aircraft parts. 2. Sole-source award to Raytheon Company raises questions about competitive pricing. 3. Long contract duration of 465 days may impact cost-effectiveness. 4. Lack of small business participation noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $6.87 million for controller assemblies is difficult to benchmark without specific unit costs or comparison to similar sole-source awards. The lack of competition suggests potential for overpricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This method limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for this $6.87 million contract means taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible price for these aircraft parts.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for essential aircraft components due to the lack of competitive bidding. The Department of the Navy's reliance on a single supplier for this critical part warrants scrutiny. Future procurement strategies should prioritize competitive sourcing to ensure value for money.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • No small business participation

Positive Signals

  • Contract awarded to a known entity (Raytheon Company)
  • Clear delivery timeline provided

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector. Spending in this area is critical for defense readiness, but competitive sourcing is vital to manage costs effectively.

Small Business Impact

The contract explicitly states that small businesses were not involved (ss: false, sb: false). This represents a missed opportunity to support small businesses and potentially introduce innovative solutions or competitive pricing.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award suggests a potential gap in competitive sourcing oversight. Further review is needed to understand why this contract was not competed and if adequate justification exists.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award lacks competition.
  • Potential for inflated pricing due to no competitive pressure.
  • No small business participation.
  • Long contract duration may not be optimal for cost control.
  • Lack of transparency regarding justification for sole-source.

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ca, delivery-order, 1m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $6.9 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-06. End: 2027-04-16.

What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps were taken to ensure fair and reasonable pricing?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of viable alternatives. Without this information, it's impossible to assess if fair and reasonable pricing was achieved. The absence of competition inherently limits price discovery, potentially leading to higher costs for the government and taxpayers.

What is the specific function of the 'CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY' and its criticality to naval aviation operations?

The 'CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY' likely refers to a component that regulates or manages the operation of a specific aircraft system. Its criticality would depend on the system it controls, potentially impacting flight controls, engine management, or mission systems. Understanding its role is key to assessing the risk associated with a sole-source award.

How does the firm fixed price (FFP) contract type mitigate risk for the government in this sole-source scenario?

A firm fixed price contract shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, Raytheon Company. While this provides cost certainty for the government, it does not inherently guarantee a fair price, especially in a sole-source situation. The government still bears the risk of paying a non-competitive price if adequate price analysis was not performed.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ELECTRIC WIRE, POWER DISTRIB EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: RTX Corp

Address: 6380 HOLLISTER AVE, GOLETA, CA, 93117

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $6,872,572

Exercised Options: $6,872,572

Current Obligation: $6,872,572

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0038322DT501

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-01-06

Current End Date: 2027-04-16

Potential End Date: 2027-04-16 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-06

More Contracts from Raytheon Company

View all Raytheon Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending